Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Okay Arc, here is your BIG question:

"The question is what would you have done if you weren't sitting at that win/loss limit? If you would have folded then what you did is just fine. If not, then you let the a non-poker factor drive you and that is not smart."

My answer is this: If I wasn't sitting where I was, with a win goal, and not wishing to lose any more chips, I would have called the extra $12 to see the flop.
So, you admit you gave up a perceived advantage simply due to your loss limit. My point exactly, thank you.

No, it doesn't mean you would have won that hand. It simply means (if your analysis was correct) that you would win more of these situations than you would lose. That is the goal of smart gamblers.