Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by unowme View Post
A smart person wouldn't have commented at all on the questionable legality of the exploit. No reason to bring more attention to it. That implies two possibilities.
Irrelevant. A smart person understands commenting negatively about what others have done in no way affects what they have done. That's the same as implying anyone who agreed with Kane and Nestor's exploits brought attention to themselves--who did nothing. Let's hang Vegas Vic, who "brought attention" to this play.

There's your two possibilities.
The two possibilities I saw were:
1. You weren't very smart about commenting in the exploit....admitting you thought it was illegal.
2. You didn't really exploit the double up flaw.

You claimed to have taken many extreme precautions like not even telling your family until years later. Yet you commented on the exploit admitting you thought it was fraud...right in the middle of your Statute of Limitations clock. That's not very smart.

Of course there is a third possibility. That both 1 and 2 are true.