Setting Win Limitations

[Frank Kneeland]

This seems to be turning into an argument. I can only assume this is because you feel I'm attacking you in some way. If this is true, I'm sorry that was not my intent. I would only like for us to understand each other better and come to some sort detente. In the interests of better understanding I'll try to answer your comments below. You may need to refer to what your comments were in reference to for the reply to make sense.

Nope, I've simply repeated things you've already stated previously.

I am not aware of any comments I have made in reference to believing or not believing anything Rob has said. If I have made such comments in the past I don't remember making them. I thought I was going out of my way not to broach that particular subject. Without knowing the exact comment you are referencing I cannot reply with certainty.

I don't have a "case". I simply state facts. Now it appears you are "making comments about what I believe".

This comment is entirely about my opinion of how it appears from my POV that your posts are being received. It in no way references "what you believe". I'm not sure how you could have taken it that way. It is a comment about what I believe.

What evidence do you have to support this conjecture?

I was basing this on the overgrowing stable of negative private emails I have about you, that swells like the morning tide every time you make a negative post about Rob. If you have a similar number of negative private emails about Rob as a result of your posts then I retract the comment. I agree that my information source is biased. I was just trying to let you know that there was some negative blow-back from your efforts. I did not think you would try to shoot the messenger.

I think I can understand the things you have written. Maybe you need to go back and look at what you have written. But hey, feel free to point out where I have stated you wrote something that you haven't previously written.

The only thing I didn't remember talking about was the veracity of Rob's comments. I thought I had refrained from comment, for or against. I would like to stay neutral on that subject as it is too emotionally charged of a topic.

Hope this clears things up.