Originally Posted by
MaxPen
Originally Posted by
Rounder
In fairness, there are a couple other scenarios that are possible.
A. He's a losing slot player and just likes playing Cashman bingo
B. He was taking many plays way too light
C. He played it a lot knowing he would lose to gather data on the game
D. He didn't necessarily say he personally received the pay outs of the full screen pays himself. He may have just done a lot of camping on Cashman banks and seen the event a few times.
I swear this place is full of brain trusts. I already stated why I played them. Go back and read the post.
In terms of measuring one's intelligence, my IQ is 131 according to the State of Florida. This number was derived from the IQ test I was given to be admitted into the "gifted program", as it was called at the time. Specifically, my left brain portion of the test was reported to be in the 99th percentile of results.
I'm relatively new here and I say the above, at risk of sounding like a d-bag, to contradict what you insinuated, providing supporting information that I am objectively intelligent and numerically inclined.
I wrote my post before I read your initial response to Mickey.
After reading it, I have to say that it is hard to believe there was so much action on the game that:
That's because Your highly intelligent right brain must be blocking you from comprehending the obvious. Maybe consult with the left and think about another source for the funds coming into the progressives.
A. Progressive cycles were routinely skipping so frequently that you had play after play from this
and
B. You had enough data on the game to know where the tipping point on the progs were. Even at present, the game is still relatively new.
Of course, maybe you were just taking your chances using the standard uncapped progs strategy. This wouldn't be a terrible idea, but like Mickey said, just seems far fetched progs way over reset were just raining from the skies like that.
I don't operate on terrible ideas. Being a 2 bit vulture is a bad idea. You are looking at stuff from that perspective.
To combat Mickey's point, perhaps you had a fluke streak of full screen pays features? Maybe Mickey had a fluke streak of not hitting any? There is a bell curve for everything. It's slots, crazy shit happens.
You also didn't specify that you were actually the one playing during the full screen pays. The way your post read, you could have indeed just only seen the event visually, not necessarily been playing yourself when it happened.
Top 1% and don't know what "I" means. You must have been measured on a bell curve using a group of Coach Belly's
Anyway, I have read what you say about Mickey on several threads. It seems needlessly mean, especially vs what he says about you.
You are only drawing that conclusion because you are in hopes of extracting info from the hobo in the future. Because you are incapable of figuring out stuff on your own. Typical.
What did the guy even do to you? Who started it?