Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Printable View
Don't you have some imaginary baccarat sessions to play?
There's absolutely nothing wrong with--and a whole lot right with--mdawg's persistence in the re-posting of various quotes from various members regarding what they've deduced after reading the various, poorly planned stories and collection of foolish lies as posted by the most notorious and disliked concoctionist on internet gaming forums.
Saying degrading things about mdawg in response to his very entertaining and effective kew-pounding only depicts envy of what may or may not be true about mdawg's reported gambling experiences, level of wealth, family etc.
Have you turned others onto AP plays, where they use their own money, and cut you in on the profits?:
Not that I can think of. That is not normally somthing I do. Can I say, never have I ever done that? No, I can't say that. We are talking about thousands of plays over decades dealing with a fuck ton of different people and many unique situations. There could have been some slam dunk plays where "using their own money" is moot since it's a negligible formality as it would be nearly impossible to lose.
Have you turned others onto AP plays, where they use their own money, and pay you, even if they lost money on the play you gave them?:
Not that I ever remember.
Have you given others your money to use on AP plays, and cut them in on the profits?:
Yes, absolutely, many times.
Have you given others your money to use on AP plays, and paid them even if their individual play did not profit?:
Yes.
I normally put up my share or all the money on plays. You may be in a situation where "put up my share" doesn't mean physically handing them the money before they start the play, however, you are responsible for any losses that may occur. There are just so many unique situations and different people who are in different situations themselves.
But again, if you're trying to compare any of this to Red's situation, it's a moot point because it's apples and oranges.
You'd have to be a huge retard to be envious of imaginary baccarat sessions.
First I don't condone the hijacking of EVERY thread by Madwg to continue with his obsessive trolling. He has adequate threads, most started by him to troll me. There is no need to hijack this thread started by mickey, attempting to get to the bottom of Redietz's history and claims.
But since he has and Singer is piling on with his bullshit, Jdaewoo beat me to the punch and that is no one is, nor is it even possible to be envious of made up fantasy claims, whether it be Mdawgs win-every-day at baccarat/blackjack or Singers Newell and 1.5 million dollar jackpots . THESE are made up claims. It would be like being jealous of Scrooge McDuck or Billionaire Monty Burns on the Simpsons.
The only people REALLY jealous or envious of anyone are these two guys, Mdawg and Singer, making up such ridiculous stories and claims. They are obviously very envious of real players (just about every AP on this forum) that really win using advantage play methods and techniques. Otherwise there would be no need to make up what are so obvious and ridiculous claims that they do.
I disagree.
Just because it's not exactly what red is doing, doesn't mean that the arrangements are not comparable.
Take mickey's post below....
This corresponds to my question about you turning someone onto a play, where they use their own money for the play, and then cut you in on the profits.
You may not do that, and may not have ever done something like that, but isn't that what Integrity Sports does?
red finds a play, turns the client onto the play, the client bets their own money, and pays red a percentage of the profit.
JFTR, you have never sold a play, some play that you can't physically participate in?
Not everyone is broke. Some people have their own money to get started. If they lose they will bill me and I'll pay them whenever we meet up or after the play. Here's the thing, it's rare that I bring someone in on a play that isn't a slam dunk for the most part. The biggest risk I'm normal taking is getting fucked by the casino's and no paid on a promotion.
There's no hard fast rules as I said each play and individual is different.
Why do you ask him yourself. I can only go by what he has said in the past and whatever his websites indicated. I already said this is a moot conversation until we know how his business model works.
And to answer your other question.
I don't recall if I have ever sold any plays, it's possible I have, but if I have it's been a very rare occasion and unique situation. I have bought and paid for plays and information on numerous occasions.
How and why is it that coach belly is now speaking for Redietz, seemingly knowing how he operates or operated? And where did he get this information from? Is Redietz feeding him these talking points? because most contradict what Redietz has claimed through most of this forum history.
For example, I damn well know Redietz denied any kind of recruiting of clients until mickeycrimm dug up an old Integrity sports website or webpage with the advertising pitch, including expected returns on it.
Now all of the sudden coach belly seems to know all about how Redietz's operation worked. Unless Belly was one of those clients, I would like to know where he is getting his information, because frankly he has a history of making things up in his defense of those he tries to defend, which is almost always those on the outside of reality.
And no, it's not the same.
I assume you were talking about a situation where I start calling people about plays and I expect them to use their own money, take all the risk and pay me money only if they make money, and I pay them nothing if they lose.
That's exactly how those touts and people who take on investors for sports betting work. If the chumps win the guru gets his cut, if the chumps lose, too bad so sad. Repeat this each year.
Why would anybody agree to this arrangement? I guess maybe once, until they fully understand what is happening. But no one is going to stick with that arrangement are they?
And if not, then like most types of scams, the sports betting recruiters needs to find new "suckers" every year or cycle?
If this is indeed what Redietz was doing for 45 years, color me less than impressed with his sports betting career. :rolleyes:
My question was straight-forward and clear, I never asked about calling people, and what was expected. Although if you didn't stake them, then you must have expected them to use money that didn't come from you...right?
But you made an assumption in order to duck the question.
Again..
First you answered "no" or "I don't recall".
Then, you gave an example where you did give others a play, they did use their own money, and you took a cut of the profits.
Don't waste time telling me what they consider, or which pockets their money goes into or out of.
They used their money on the play, and you took a cut of their win.