Printable View
All of your name-calling is a deflection.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You're nothing more than a windbag version of dung jaewoo or Keystone.
Have the 4 members that you've met IRL post here to substantiate your claim.
If you can't or don't then politely excuse yourself from this group and disappear.
Am I clear?
You're clear in that you're nonsensical. You don't get that even those of us who are bored have other shit to do. And thats not "hey man could you login to VCT and tell coach belly you've met me in person".Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyAll of your name-calling is a deflection.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You're nothing more than a windbag version of dung jaewoo or Keystone.
Have the 4 members that you've met IRL post here to substantiate your claim.
If you can't or don't then politely excuse yourself from this group and disappear.
Am I clear?
Is that not clear?
I guess a guy like you who values his time at $0 then it makes sense .. but to the rest of the successful world, it doesn't.
Is it that not clear? lol. anyway, good night.
You can pay me to ask them.. sure.. but I get the feeling you're fairly broke.
OK Yes I will pay you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Post their screen names, how much $ you need to ask them to corroborate your stories, and whatever payment instructions you have.
Why does coach belly, and at times others like Redietz, think anyone on an anonymous internet forum needs to provide proof of anything? :confused: I never understood that. It's like they think different people are on trial and they are the judge.
next question: What difference does it even make if accountinQ has met several people on this forum? :confused:
I don't doubt that AinQ has met some people. But guess what, it still doesn't change that a lot of what he says is bullshit or not true and that most of it is just trolling. Just like Dawg has met someone from WoV (The guy that used to own the forum), but still everything he claims is bullshit.
hey Rob met Alan, and who knows who else. Does that mean Rob's claims are not bullshit? of course NOT. :cool:
You've spent far more time on this forum than I have, and you'll spend far more time here than I will going forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So what does that say about how you value your time, or how successful your world is?
You make no sense.
Put up or shut up.
Am I clear?
I'll post a btc address and $200 once received is the cost. You have 3 of the 4. Dan druff rarely posts here. I'm not sure what stories you've invented you need to corroborate? But $200 is completely reasonable and they can corroborate they've met me.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyOK Yes I will pay you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Post their screen names, how much $ you need to ask them to corroborate your stories, and whatever payment instructions you have.
Just agree and I'll get you a btc address tomorrow.
Sounds good.
But everyone knows .. even at $200 this won't happen. You're another clown but my offer is sincere and completely reasonable.
This is literally the only forum I post on with any sort of regularity. But yea agree and I'll copy and paste the address.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou've spent far more time on this forum than I have, and you'll spend far more time here than I will going forward.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So what does that say about how you value your time, or how successful your world is?
You make no sense.
Put up or shut up.
Am I clear?
And regardless of how successful I am or not - I do value my time. I don't do things I don't care to do. From this thread I get the feeling you don't understand the concept.
You can't even get it straight whether you've been on teams or not. Nothing. Just go off and ramble on like a madman talking to himself in a mirror.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
We are asking for proof, not thinking that any proof is needed.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Your proof is not needed, because we are certain that it doesn't exist.
Nobody believes you, nobody expects proof. The expectation is that you cannot provide proof.
We are asking as a courtesy...as some glimmer of hope that you are legit.
No I don't have 3 of the 4 names.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Post the 4 screen names.
Have them post here to corroborate having met you.
I don't understand what you need to copy and paste, but go right ahead and do whatever you think is appropriate.
One acknowledged it in this thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyNo I don't have 3 of the 4 names.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Post the 4 names.
I said Dan druff.
And you know of Mickey.
That's 3.
Calling you a mentally deficient was more description than a name.
I was told you have been doing this same thing on forums for near 20 years. You don't win. You just wear people down.
I'll have the 4th post here upon receipt of $200 which I'll spend on a nice steak with him.
I paste a Btc address to my wallet. I was told you're very ancient so I will be patient and can send you resources on how to buy and send btc.
Whether I have been involved in some team play, long ago in Atlantic City, or more recently, or involved in some small non-BJ team plays is none of your business....unless I choose to share that. I share what I want to share. I don't have to provide you, or anyone else a complete history of everything I have done. And if I have not shared something like that, there probably is a good reason for it, like something about that experience could be identifying, to at least some people I would rather not be identified by. If you can't figure that out, you REALLY are a dumb fuck!Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Now it so happens the team play I did some 16 years ago in Atlantic City is no big deal now, all this time later as far as identifying me. But it was at the time, which is why I never mentioned it. Players on that team were compromised, and for some it was the end of their career. That was a time, teams and those that ran them were recruiting and using "disposable players", which is why I wasn't involved for long. I made a quick buck (more than I could make playing solo) which boosted my BR and quickly moved on.
But what is interesting about this incident recently being revealed is that it was revealed by somewhat known member of a top team for a very long time. He associated with a very well know top player. And YET, no matter, doesn't seem to matter to the haters like you.
See you lurking redietz. I'm sure you're itching to go on about people being anonymous. Hope all is well.
Gambling is full of trolls. Otherwise lots of them would have had straight jobs. Some guy claiming to have met you means very very little. It is a great way to stir the pot and inflate your sails from afar. Mdawg has the conflicting quotes on this. You can't keep it straight.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhether I have been involved in some team play, long ago in Atlantic City, or more recently, or involved in some small non-BJ team plays is none of your business....unless I choose to share that. I share what I want to share. I don't have to provide you, or anyone else a complete history of everything I have done. And if I have not shared something like that, there probably is a good reason for it, like something about that experience could be identifying, to at least some people I would rather not be identified by. If you can't figure that out, you REALLY are a dumb fuck!Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Now it so happens the team play I did some 16 years ago in Atlantic City is no big deal now, all this time later as far as identifying me. But it was at the time, which is why I never mentioned it. Players on that team were compromised, and for some it was the end of their career. That was a time, teams and those that ran them were recruiting and using "disposable players", which is why I wasn't involved for long. I made a quick buck (more than I could make playing solo) which boosted my BR and quickly moved on.
But what is interesting about this incident recently being revealed is that it was revealed by somewhat known member of a top team for a very long time. He associated with a very well know top player. And YET, no matter, doesn't seem to matter to the haters like you.
Attaching yourself and putting any stock in anything Dawg claims, just proves what a complete fool you are. The guy is the biggest fraud and troll since Singer. He is on par with some of the youtube nutjobs.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I have yet to see him be accused of making up the quotes. This is your new tactic.. your attempts to discredit others don't work at all anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJAttaching yourself and putting any stock in anything Dawg claims, just proves what a complete fool you are. The guy is the biggest fraud and troll since Singer. He is on par with some of the youtube nutjobs.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Get help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
First of all, this forum was founded on the premise that it was NOT an "anonymous internet forum." The main poster, Alan Mendelson, was NOT anonymous. The next most common posters were NOT anonymous. Alan Mendelson, Singer, the guy running the video poker and slot teams, the Dice Influencing writer and team captain, myself, and others -- none of us were anonymous. Let me repeat that -- the MAJORITY of the primary posters were NOT anonymous. This held true for years.
That's not even counting people like mickey or (on other forums) "Jean Scott," who, while not using their real names, are not exactly "anonymous forum posters."
This forum devolved into the anonymous fairy tale forum when the low-end, "maybe I'm a pro" alleged "APs" decided it was their preferred bedroom for nighty-night stories. With no evidence. With no corroboration. With no actual verification of anything. With banal, no-detail explications, like kewlJ's, and so on.
So kewlJ's little observation and question is not only historically incorrect (surprise, surprise as Gomer Pyle would say), but utter bullshit, as per usual.
But allow me to properly frame his question, "Why would anyone on a formerly not anonymous forum request proof of anything?" Because some people don't like the idea that they are wasting their time reading fairy tales.
Addendum note: This entire topic is going to spin out of control soon enough. Within months, forums are going to be deluged with traffic-generating AI posts being assigned to various handles under the auspices of human posting. Much, if not most, of your posting will likely be in response to some auto-program, sucking minutes and hours out of your life that could be spent actually interacting with human beings (some with actual names). There will be no way to figure out when or if a person is doing the actual posting, so people can just bleed off their time responding to things not written by people.
That's not acceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Here are the original terms...it's all on record in this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Yay redietz posted. Crazily he rants about anonymity but in a way that is quite reasonable.
Now I can go to bed and deal with unpleasant real life tomorrow.
But yea AI is bleak. For so many reasons. Honestly I should write a blog.
Not how deals work. You have to give something. $200 in this case. Enough for a great steak. Without drinks maybe he can bring his wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyThat's not acceptable.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Here are the original terms...it's all on record in this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Well then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.
Here is an example of Dawgs troll games: Mdawg has posted a quote from my account at another forum, talking about moving to Las Vegas in 2014 after graduating college, which of course contradicts the fact that I moved here in 2009. BUT, that post was made by my brother. He is the one that graduated college in 2014 and moved to Vegas at that time. AND he identified at the start of the post that it was him speaking, not me. Dawg conveniently left that part out.
Your stupidity, in not knowing what he is doing, is astounding. Everyone else has figured it out....why haven't you? :confused:
And you just said he doesn't make them up. Out of context and all that -Ok! You've said so much over the years .. mdawg will be able to clear it up when he's back. I'm sure. He's sadistic but my empathy for you is so tapped. At this point it has crossed over into some weird form of performance art.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWell then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.
You incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.
Am I clear?
Red, I am NOT even going to get into this shit again with you. I trust that your not understanding why a real AP would need to maintain anonymity when posting on a public gambling forum is just something that you don't understand because you are not an AP making a living off casinos in the same manner that we do.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
First of all, this forum was founded on the premise that it was NOT an "anonymous internet forum." The main poster, Alan Mendelson, was NOT anonymous. The next most common posters were NOT anonymous. Alan Mendelson, Singer, the guy running the video poker and slot teams, the Dice Influencing writer and team captain, myself, and others -- none of us were anonymous. Let me repeat that -- the MAJORITY of the primary posters were NOT anonymous. This held true for years.
That's not even counting people like mickey or (on other forums) "Jean Scott," who, while not using their real names, are not exactly "anonymous forum posters."
This forum devolved into the anonymous fairy tale forum when the low-end, "maybe I'm a pro" alleged "APs" decided it was their preferred bedroom for nighty-night stories. With no evidence. With no corroboration. With no actual verification of anything. With banal, no-detail explications, like kewlJ's, and so on.
So kewlJ's little observation and question is not only historically incorrect (surprise, surprise as Gomer Pyle would say), but utter bullshit, as per usual.
But allow me to properly frame his question, "Why would anyone on a formerly not anonymous forum request proof of anything?" Because some people don't like the idea that they are wasting their time reading fairy tales.
Addendum note: This entire topic is going to spin out of control soon enough. Within months, forums are going to be deluged with traffic-generating AI posts being assigned to various handles under the auspices of human posting. Much, if not most, of your posting will likely be in response to some auto-program, sucking minutes and hours out of your life that could be spent actually interacting with human beings (some with actual names). There will be no way to figure out when or if a person is doing the actual posting, so people can just bleed off their time responding to things not written by people.
But I will tell you this, when I came to this forum, you Red claimed that you knew how card counting worked and had done some at times. I have no idea what levels of amounts, but enough that you claimed to know how it works in regards to casinos and heat and all that. And you said that what I claimed was exactly the way it worked. I can pull up some quotes if your memory is failing you. You also seemed to have some understanding of tracking a second table, and defended that against people like Alan, that were claiming you needed super powers to do so.
So it seems you understood....at least until you decided not to or to pretend not to. And it is no coincidence that that flip occurred when I moved into a little bit of sports betting AP play last year. THAT is when you turned on me and other APs. Like how dare we move into your sports betting territory. And it wasn't that you turned. You can like or not like whoever you want, but you started going along with the lies that you KNEW were lies and even adding to them. Completely flip-flopping on things you had previously said.
Red, I don't have a huge issue with you, other than you are now being retarded towards not only me, but any AP that dares do some sports betting at an advantage. Get the fuck over it!
Did I miss where coach belly purchased this forum and now makes the rules? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.
Am I clear?
Dawg can't and won't clear anything up because he can't. he might lie some more....that is usually what he does.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionAnd you just said he doesn't make them up. Out of context and all that -Ok! You've said so much over the years .. mdawg will be able to clear it up when he's back. I'm sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWell then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.
Look it is not that difficult. Even you should be able to figure this out. Lets examine basic gambling claims. Forget all the nonsense like that i surfed when a teenager, or who I choose to love and live with. Just basic gambling claims.
Dawg: That he gambles high limits and wins 90+% of his days/sessions totaling millions of dollars. (he is over $600,000 just for this year on about 10 days play). AND that he plays rated so casino know exactly what he wins, in the hi limit rooms were there are half dozen sets of eyes on a player like him, and he wins and wins and wins, and casinos love him. Pit folks love him and comp him out the ass. Never any heat or counter-measures. He is NOT in the databases.
Now compare that to me.
KewlJ: Midlevel card counter/advantage player for most of my time here in Vegas (play a bit different and higher stakes now). I played unrated, moved around A LOT! Short sessions. Trying to minimize attention drawn. And when an issue did arise, I would not play that casino for a period. I have been backed off probably 70+ times, trespassed and back roomed once (same casino). Sort of 86ed from another, at least to their thinking. I have multiple entries in several different databases. Everything I do is designed toward longevity, including playing unrated and giving up comps and EV.
Now which of these sounds like reality to you and which seems like some sort of James Bond "Hollywood" adventure? And guess what, the word "adventure" is the title of his long running thread. :confused:
Now once you figure that out and again, everyone has except you, then why on earth would you be going down each of these rabbit holes that he creates to deflect? Are you really this stupid? Or just pretending as part of your troll activities.
Any player, recreational to professional knows casinos just do not let players win what dawg claims in the manner he claims. Some players (APs) do win, but they have to work at it. No one is patting them on the back and handing buckets of money and comps on top.
One final thing for your consideration. Throughout the 5 years Dawg has stated or hinted at several different ways he gains and advantage. Everything from rebates, to card counting, to voodoo nonsense like "betting into hot streaks". In the last year he has settled on that he is rain man with total recall of every card played. Whether you want to be the one person that believes that is up to you, but for sake of this exercise, lets just say it were true. He is rain man. :rolleyes:
Would casinos still allow him to win every day as he claims even if they could not figure out how he was winning? Is THAT really the way casinos work? :confused:
And no, I don't expect you will cease trolling and answer any of these questions honestly. But my point is that once you figure this out, why would you go down each of these rabbit holes he creates. I guess you have already answered. You are trolling.
PRIVATE messages have NO expectation of privacy on this forum!!!!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJDid I miss where coach belly purchased this forum and now makes the rules? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYou incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.
Am I clear?
Why is this even a discussion?
If meeting with or having telecons with AQ were a special kinda thing, I'd have done something like that long ago.
And why resurrect kew again, when we had the weakling who can never do what he says he's gonna do, right where he was wanted?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgOnly a person who cannot control his bowel movements, let alone his actions, would keep vowing to never return to a forum, never respond to so and so (including to MDawg and R.Singer), and yet keep breaking his vows.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawgShe’s an embarrassment an indecisive twit to end all indecisive twits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
I saw Singer one time.
Was heading to Reno & saw this Newell driving up the mountain, tried to peer in the window & the guy did look just like Singer.
Went to grab my phone to snap a picture, but too dangerous to do that on those mountain roads while driving & plus he was in the slow lane, the Newell goes up the mountain pretty slow compared to all the other traffic.
By the way RED, your PM’s are full again.
I think it was 4 or 5 years ago now. I was at Choctaw Casino, Durant, Oklahoma, with 7500 machines the 2nd largest casino in the world. I was on a play. Can't remember what it was. Someone from behind asked me if I was Mickey Crimm. It was AQ.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyI disagree that mickey seems to believe. To me, it doesn't seem like he believes.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
But I'm more interested in your meeting with mickey.
Considering that virtually none of the members here have met, your meeting in the wild was extraordinary.
But there is a suspicious lack of information about that meeting.
monet meets nobody Axel, and a no holds barred adventures thread follows.
You meet the legendary mickey crimm, and there's a media blackout...no info, other than that you met.
That's suspicious...don't you agree?
So we had a conversation about machines. Talked about several of them. Can't remember what I told him. He told me about a game I was aware of but hadn't had time to analyze yet. But he couldn't tell me for sure if the game was profitable. He just thought it might be possible. We hit a burger joint and both got orders to go. I went to my room. The whole encounter probably wasn't more than an hour.
I later analyzed the game and worked it into my repertoire. It was a good card builder/comp runner. I'll show the game in it's own thread.
Yesterday I took AQ off ignore well over the month I said I would keep him on it. I went over posts he made shortly after I had informed him that I was putting him on ignore. I was looking to see if he quit with the gratuitous trolling.
I found a post he made to KJ where he said "Guess who showed Mickey that game?" It was the game he told me about at Choctaw. Well, yes, he did tell me the game existed. But nothing else. He didn't really know anything about it, just that it might be a play. He didn't give me any stats or entry points or anything.
Sure, thanks, AQ, for pointing out the game. You are one of many who have pointed out games to me over the years. I always love analyzing new games. And the game did work out.
I'm on a forum of machine pros that's behind a paywall. Except, I have a free honorary membership. I'm anonymous on the forum except the Administrator knows who I am. I give advice on plays but I also get to keep abreast of the new cutting edge games that hit the casino floors. I've always been a sponge for information no matter where it comes from, even from AQ.
When you put someone on Ignore this is what you get to see (see pick below). You can't ignore them fully because a message pops up that a person you put on ignore just made a post. WTF is that? I put the person on ignore so I could ignore them. And not to be reminded everytime an ignored person makes a post.
And then, you can see that KJ makes a post where he quoted the person I have on ignore. So you have the person on ignore but there's a text box with the ignoree's text in it anytime someone quote's him. Fuck me running.
Putting someone on Ignore doesn't really mean you get to ignore them fully.
On Twitter, when you put someone on ignore, you never see anything from them. It's like they disappeared into outer space. That's the way all these forums should be.
I am going to repeat, that approaching an AP in a casino while he is playing, like AQ did seems pretty amateurish and inappropriate to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
In the instance described above, just suppose player A, mickeycrimm was on the casinos radar as an advantage player, but they hadn't gotten around to taking any action against him yet, but were just "watching him". Now player B, comes up and has a conversation with him. Now they begin to take a look at players B's play. Player B could wind up in a database listed as an "associate" of Player A, just as happened to my friend from a blackjack forum.
I don't know....maybe it is different for machine players. As a table game player, I would NEVER do that. It has the potential to damage both players.
I have had someone call me by my online handle in a casino at least twice that I remember. I ignored both parties. Didn't even flinch or act like it had any meaning to me. It may very well have been someone from one of the forums, making the same inappropriate move AQ did, but my gut tells me there is a better than 50/50 chance it was someone from the casino looking for a reaction.
Doing or saying something looking for or to see if there is a reaction is a common tactic for casinos. I have mentioned the tactic of casino pit coming to the table and flipping through discard tray. Common wisdom is that they are looking to see if there are more low cards in the tray, which would make the remaining cards favorable to the player. But more often than not that aren't even really doing that. They just want to see what reaction it gets. They do the same thing with comments. Sometimes a pit person will make a very mild comment about card counting, to see if it spooks the player or not.
Again, my experiences are based on my table game player career and experiences. Maybe it is very appropriate for machine players to do what AQ did. I don't know. I wouldn't be happy about it.
I 100% knew that game was profitable and a play. It was one of my favorite games. I like how in your head you've told yourself some version of it like I needed your help in some fashion .. like you're the jedi-master of games or something. lol. I would not have necessarily known floor entry points on the bottom end but I definitely knew when it would be a play. I only brought it up recently because it had been brought up in the thread that I was being accused of being an imposter of some sort. (no, I don't recall) So me pointing out that I showed Mickey the same game Mickey had brought up in that thread was kinda an indication that at least I don't make up shit. I don't even really tell stories. I don't have many to say. I believe even when I brought it up again I said made some form of a disclaimer to make it clear I wasn't trying to imply I taught Mickey much of anything or whatever. Of course when he unblocked me he went back and read all those messages (lol ;) ) And even with my disclaimer it bothered his self-image as game jedi-master. So so much that he returned to the subject because he had found it discussion worthy.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI think it was 4 or 5 years ago now. I was at Choctaw Casino, Durant, Oklahoma, with 7500 machines the 2nd largest casino in the world. I was on a play. Can't remember what it was. Someone from behind asked me if I was Mickey Crimm. It was AQ.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyI disagree that mickey seems to believe. To me, it doesn't seem like he believes.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
But I'm more interested in your meeting with mickey.
Considering that virtually none of the members here have met, your meeting in the wild was extraordinary.
But there is a suspicious lack of information about that meeting.
monet meets nobody Axel, and a no holds barred adventures thread follows.
You meet the legendary mickey crimm, and there's a media blackout...no info, other than that you met.
That's suspicious...don't you agree?
So we had a conversation about machines. Talked about several of them. Can't remember what I told him. He told me about a game I was aware of but hadn't had time to analyze yet. But he couldn't tell me for sure if the game was profitable. He just thought it might be possible. We hit a burger joint and both got orders to go. I went to my room. The whole encounter probably wasn't more than an hour.
I later analyzed the game and worked it into my repertoire. It was a good card builder/comp runner. I'll show the game in it's own thread.
Yesterday I took AQ off ignore well over the month I said I would keep him on it. I went over posts he made shortly after I had informed him that I was putting him on ignore. I was looking to see if he quit with the gratuitous trolling.
I found a post he made to KJ where he said "Guess who showed Mickey that game?" It was the game he told me about at Choctaw. Well, yes, he did tell me the game existed. But nothing else. He didn't really know anything about it, just that it might be a play. He didn't give me any stats or entry points or anything.
Sure, thanks, AQ, for pointing out the game. You are one of many who have pointed out games to me over the years. I always love analyzing new games. And the game did work out.
I'm on a forum of machine pros that's behind a paywall. Except, I have a free honorary membership. I'm anonymous on the forum except the Administrator knows who I am. I give advice on plays but I also get to keep abreast of the new cutting edge games that hit the casino floors. I've always been a sponge for information no matter where it comes from, even from AQ.
Then we got Kewl posting later in this thread opining about how bad of an idea if it was to talk to Mickey. "What if he was on their radar". I could pick this apart as how asinine this is but it goes to show how shallow Kewl's understanding is of anything. Again though - much like Mickey - his opinions (Mickey's memory) is very self-serving. Kewl sees himself as some wizard of casinos because hes spent decades on the internet reading about blackjack and tries to extrapolate that into wider casino operations. I could go into details why Kewl is sooo wrong and why it really shouldn't be a concern but I have no desire to seed his brain with reality or go off on subjects not already being discussed. Of course we have to endure his teachable moment that he pulls out of his ass every time. No real AP would do that because they'd have a sense for the situation and not consider it being worth discussing. Not Kewl though. He sees a way to distinguish himself as mr worldy casino guy so he talks out of his ass.
People say I'm a troll but in general I'm just straight forward and factual. I was that time. And I typically am. Mickey started going on into fake news related things regarding Pete Hegseth and I corrected him. I do not like incompetents being in charge of my country and I will speak up. That doesn't make me a troll. People just don't want to hear it. Mickey has been misdirected in his intake of fake media and often doesn't understand what the real issues are. I clarified. Then he claims I'm the troll... then why did he bring up Pete Hegseth , lapdog of the elites, and fuckup employee of multiple veterans non-profits? You can't have it both ways. Well some think they can but they shouldn't be crying troll! troll! troll!. Kewl does this same shit all the time too.
And this is much like a week ago when Half-smoke brought up AI. I prefaced my post with 'take this with a grain of salt'. I seem to recall the Hong Kong guys had racing times that were at a higher granularity than what was publicly available. Of course I was open to misremembering but the point was that this sort of data would likely also be needed for an effective AI to be created.
But here comes Redietz! He thinks the discussion is about the guys who beat Hong Kong racing (and which he likely knows more about me) and then goes out of his way to be an obnoxious troll. lol. He has something to prove !! Just like Kewl in this thread !! and to a lesser degree like Mickey.
So I just spent the next few posts clowning on Redietz because it is too easy and he had asked for it. Yet, when he claimed he wouldn't post again, I'm sure it is because of "AIQ the troll". Maybe not. Some sort of victim shit - that much I do recall. I come here for entertainment and smetimes to read something factually interesting. I'm never hear to prove shit. I don't care. I have nothing to prove. I've never claimed to be a professional gambler while on this forum. I don't talk about things I have no clue about.
has beenQuote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
see post 3279 from sportsbetting thread as I won't just repost in every thread as dawg does.
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...etting/page164
You most certainly do. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This is interesting. I though you at least implied you were a professional player/AP. Maybe that was my mistake. When someone says AP, I tend to think they are doing so for a living, when probably most aren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So what is it that you do or did for a living? And what qualifies you to tell real APs that play for a living and have for many years what you think is or isn't true or accurate? Seriously...don't brush this off. What qualifies you?
Being an advantage player just means you play at an advantage. Nothing more. You're severely mentally ill and I'm not about to get into trying to defend myself with a nutbird such as yourself. Of course I'll brush you off. I'm not an idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJYou most certainly do. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This is interesting. I though you at least implied you were a professional player/AP. Maybe that was my mistake. When someone says AP, I tend to think they are doing so for a living, when probably most aren't.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So what is it that you do or did for a living? And what qualifies you to tell real APs that play for a living and have for many years what you think is or isn't true or accurate? Seriously...don't brush this off. What qualifies you?
You don't even understand the distinction between being a "professional" vs a winning player. There are many winning poker players out there that are not "professionals". I.e. it isn't their profession. Same with AP.
You could't begin to tell me what I talk about that I am clueless about. You just have jibberishbrains.
Like me calling bullshit on your hiring some dude off craigslist who hacked the main product of a billion dollar company in 15 minutes. Which if true would be the downfall of that company and have severe repercussions for gambling worldwide. It is pretty obvious to me but most people don't think like me. They don't question. They're sheep in one way or another.
No one believes you. MisterV might but he's as big of a troll as anyone.
Get help.
Kewl whines incessantly about not having to prove anything. Yet he makes claims that should not be believed by default.
Now he wants me to give him my CV in gambling to explain why I know that casinos don't watch the slot-floor or particularly care about random players picking off a few hundred a day walking around the casino. Because "he knows" even though as he explains he is quick to point out how he really doesn't know. He is just a table-game AP.
Then he says I talk about things I don't know about but gives not one example. And he wouldn't be able to. Yet he wants me to prove myself to him for who knows what reason. Ugh. Is this like the last site this miscreant is still allowed to post on? 80% of the posting here is based aroudn the theme of Kewl the fool.
This thread is fun.
We have AQ speaking out of both sides of his mouth re: gambling, and how irritable he got over a complete competent like Pete Hegseth (Yale/Princeton graduate) BEING CONFIRMED IN A SENATE COMPRISED OF A MULTITUDE OF INTELLECTUALS who also have educational credentials FAR EXCEEDING THAT OF AQ.
Then we have a little phony weasel like kew trying to display some twisted, low-level type of "AP Superiority" by claiming how "dangerous & damaging" it is to have any forum member start up a conversation with another forum member during a by-chance meeting while playing inside a casino.
Kew, do tell: WTF is wrong with you?...I mean, outside of being a sissified little homo, dumb as a bag of rocks, and a weakass serial liar with zero life?
It is always the men who had a 9-5 job schlepping that absolutely praise Pete Hegseth. Those who actually do things on their own and understand how things have to be managed - don't worship men like Trump/Hegseth. Trump with the bankruptcies and fraud and other shit and then you have Pete who (if sources are to be believed) financially mismanaged 2 non-profits and was forced out. I mean whatever. There are far far worse than Pete. He just doesn't give a fuck and likes to drink. He wasn't going around fucking people over. I mean even his mother crapped on him in an email at some point. Call it "woke mind virus" but that really just shows any thinking non-sheep that you're the fucking muppet. Right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
It would be bullshit if this made up story of yours is what happened, but it is not. No craigslist. I was referred to programmer/tech a guy by a top AP. I am not going to say how he know about these machines, but he knew them inside and out. And yes it took him about 15 minutes, maybe less to show me what I wanted to see. And seeing that proved beyond any doubt these machines could do what I all but knew they could.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This is just you repeating troll talking points. How many forums do you think I have been banned from? The answer is 2 and for the same incident or situation, a feud with one person. The original ban was from Norm's blackjack forum when I challenge a guy who claimed that his super-duper count, that he thinks he invented gave him a 5% advantage in card counting. No count comes anywhere near approaching a 5% advantage in card counting. Perfect computer play, comes nowhere near a 5% advantage in card counting.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
All that occurred at WoV was Norm showed up to continue the feud and once he did, Shackleford stated that he considered Norm a friend who had done some work for him and he felt he owed him a favor, so he banned me. So it was the very same incident. And guess what Norm stopped posting there almost immediately after, just as he hadn't posted there for 5 years prior.
And guess what else, the guy that this was all about, Mr. Super-duper count, several years later admitted that his count did not come close to 5% advantage, just as I challenged. He said initial short-term results showed a 5% advantage, but as he got into longer-term came back down to the 1-2 percent that is possible from card counting. And kudos to him for being man enough to admit that.
Just stop with your fucking talking points and talking about shit that you know nothing about. WTF!
Kewl and his rolodex of "top APs". I don't care enough to track it down when I drilled down the details I recall you hiring some guy off some service. Of course it is a lie so you really don't remember what you said. Lies are a lot harder to keep up with. I may very well have that part wrong and maybe "top AP" was part of what you told me at the time. I could track it down and see if you were wrong but it wouldn't matter. You'd continue on with your charade.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJIt would be bullshit if this made up story of yours is what happened, but it is not. No craigslist. I was referred to programmer/tech a guy by a top AP. I am not going to say how he know about these machines, but he knew them inside and out.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
This is just you repeating troll talking points. How many forums do you think I have been banned from? The answer is 2 and for the same incident or situation, a feud with one person. The original ban was from Norm's blackjack forum when I challenge a guy who claimed that his super-duper count, that he thinks he invented gave him a 5% advantage in card counting. No count comes anywhere near approaching a 5% advantage in card counting. Perfect computer play, comes nowhere near a 5% advantage in card counting.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
All that occurred at WoV was Norm showed up to continue the feud and once he did, Shackleford stated that he considered Norm a friend who had done some work for him and he felt he owed him a favor, so he banned me. So it was the very same incident. And guess what Norm stopped posting there almost immediately after, just as he hadn't posted there for 5 years prior.
And guess what else, the guy that this was all about, Mr. Super-duper count, several years later admitted that his count did not come close to 5% advantage, just as I challenged. He said initial short-term results showed a 5% advantage, but as he got into longer-term came back down to the 1-2 percent that is possible from card counting. And kudos to him for being man enough to admit that.
This "top AP" thing is new to me though. Why would a top AP even know such a guy? Because he programs slot machines maybe? That has very little overlap with hacking a shuffler. It is just more rubbish. Where you hired the guy isn't improtant at all. It is the implications of what you're saying that is very important. I know a decent amount about hacking and could throw out some "I was there during ___. My friends ____" stories to show my credibility but ugh. no.
Anyway, ok I don't have my details about you correct. You've still been banned off far more sites than I ever have. I'm some mega-troll apparently but intelligent successful normal people don't have much issue with me. I mostly call out bullshit just like you do. The difference here is that you go after someone like Mdawg that I would never take seriously to begin with. You're legit threatened and jealous of his stories. Instead I'd rather call you out because you do your very best to be believable. "but the math! the math! the match checks out". Playing your little games.
Get help.
and fml for even responding to you. I feel like Singer is actually a worthy troll opponent. Like I don't feel a sense of inner-shame after responding to him. You? Ugh. Why do I lack the self-control to just ignore you consistently.
Ultimately though it has become apparent that even in the lack of response - simple attention will placate that inner need of yours. I can just see you sashaying about saying 'hey meeeeester V' ... just all attention seeking behavior.
What the fuck is the matter with me? .....What the fuck is the matter with YOU?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You just made up more shit out of thin air. Now the guy programmed slot machines. WTF!!!!!!!
And I don't have a rolodex of APs. I have a handful that I network with and that has dwindled over the years as I spent less time on the main forums. I also have one AP here in Vegas, roots in blackjack, but does far more than that now that I can call on and consider a friend. And have done some work with/for him a couple times, when he needed an extra person on a play.
You are as freaking nuts as Singer, dawg and Red. The 4 of you just keep making up shit out of the blue. So again....what the fuck is wrong with YOU??
And I go after Dawg because what he claims is bullshit and he keeps repeating it. It is or should be insulting to every AP what he claims. Players can win at gambling. Many do. And I love that many do. Many more than I do. But every AP has to work at it. And that includes table game players finding ways to be able to be allowed to keep playing. Dawgs claims of all the winning, and casinos and casino personnel slapping him on the back and comping him are insulting.
Some APs say we are actually better off with people like Dawg, Singer, Christopher Mitchel, micky Maze, the blackjack Army guy spewing bullshit. And we surely are. But I just don't like it. Players that play with an advantage and win, work at it. It isn't some fairytale James Bond bullshit.
Do you not understand what a question mark means? Really? I didn't say he programmed slot machines. I was trying to throw out any explanation about why such a person would exist. It is just rubbish that popped in your head and you think it sounds good because you know "top APs". Yea! thats how I know. I can just see these thoughts appearing in your head. You're that obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWhat the fuck is the matter with me? .....What the fuck is the matter with YOU?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You just made up more shit out of thin air. Now the guy programmed slot machines. WTF!!!!!!!
And I don't have a rolodex of APs. I have a handful that I network with and that has dwindled over the years as I spent less time on the main forums. I also have one AP here in Vegas, roots in blackjack, but does far more than that now that I can call on and consider a friend. And have done some work with/for him a couple times, when he needed an extra person on a play.
You are as freaking nuts as Singer, dawg and Red. The 4 of you just keep making up shit out of the blue. So again....what the fuck is wrong with YOU??
And I go after Dawg because what he claims is bullshit and he keeps repeating it. It is or should be insulting to every AP what he claims. Players can win at gambling. Many do. And I love that many do. Many more than I do. But every AP has to work at it. And that includes table game players finding ways to be able to be allowed to keep playing. Dawgs claims of all the winning, and casinos and casino personnel slapping him on the back and comping him are insulting.
Some APs say we are actually better off with people like Dawg, Singer, Christopher Mitchel, micky Maze, the blackjack Army guy spewing bullshit. And we surely are. But I just don't like it. Players that play with an advantage and win, work at it. It isn't some fairytale James Bond bullshit.
Get help.
You are fucking nuts AQ.
For the most part Singer has just been playing games, at least in recent years. (he started out trying to monetize his stupid claims).
Dawg on the other hand is just pissed that his story and claims NEVER met the test of how things work for whatever reason he is telling it.
Reditz...I don't know what is going on with him in recent years other than he thinks no APs have a right to do anything with sports betting.
But You AQ are just fucking nuts, like no one I have seen.
You can say that and maybe the other nuts will agree with you in shared trolly joy. Anyone with half a clue who still reads will see through this.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Not only that but this is standard projection that we've seen from kewl. I'm pointing out how much of a nut you are and now thats what you're doing towards others. Another standard from the sad playbook of the poster who goes by "KewlJ". Projection to the extreme.
Even the name "KewlJ" is what you so want to be.
My handle is a nickname that my late partner gave me 20 years ago, when we met. Nothing more. But that wont stop you from making up whatever you want.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One final thing and then I am done with you for today, hopefully longer. And it is back to the automatic shuffle machine.
Have you ever even played blackjack against such a machine? If you had you would know that these machines have the ability built in to restack the cards in sequential order by suit. And if they have that capability, they have the capability to stack cards in any order desired. As soon as someone realizes they had that first ability to stack cards in sequential order, everyone playing against them should have been concerned. I knew what was up long before I proved it with the help of the programmer/tech guy.
The big question is why would a shuffle machine have that ability? There is no legitimate reason. These machines could detect a missing card without having card readers (at extra expense), so that reason doesn't fly.
anyway, you are nuts. Have a good day.
Trump had a landslide victory because Harris came across as STUPID. An Interviewer asked her a SERIOUS question like,"Miss Harris, what are your thoughts on global warming and climate change?" Harris LAUGHED and said,"Joy comes in the morning!" Which was a beyond stupid response to a serious question. The Interviewer had an expression like,"Good Lord, this potential President across as STUPID . God help us all!" Harris should have responded with a SERIOUS expression and SERIOUS tone,"I think there needs to be more focus on the dangers of global warming and climate change," not LAUGHING and saying something VERY STUPID like,"Joy comes in the morning." :/Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
She did? She responded to a question with that answer? really?Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaTrump had a landslide victory because Harris came across as STUPID. An Interviewer asked her a SERIOUS question like,"Miss Harris, what are your thoughts on global warming and climate change?" Harris LAUGHED and said,"Joy comes in the morning!" Which was a beyond stupid response to a serious question. The Interviewer had an expression like,"Good Lord, this potential President across as STUPID . God help us all!" Harris should have responded with a SERIOUS expression and SERIOUS tone,"I think there needs to be more focus on the dangers of global warming and climate change," not LAUGHING and saying something VERY STUPID like,"Joy comes in the morning." :/Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Do you even realize that is a quote from the bible that she said during a sermon at a church. :confused:
The question she fucked up by not answering was "what she would do differently than Joe Biden did? She said "nothing comes to mind".
Trump received less than 50% of the vote. There is no definition that qualifies as a landslide. A landslide was what Reagon, or LBJ won by. Maybe Bill Clinton over Dole in our lifetimes. (not really but close).
It is fair to say Trump won with a mandate because Republicans won the Senate and held (barely) the house. But even that isn't an overwhelming mandate. We will see what he does with it.
It certainly didn't help that she's a black woman.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
I mean, who wants the president shitting all over the White House kitchen floor?
"Holy photo op!"
Who is to say the current President or the last one, two geriatric Gents didn't shit on the kitchen floor? They have staff for that. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Good point.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJWho is to say the current President or the last one, two geriatric Gents didn't shit on the kitchen floor? They have staff for that. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Even Bob is wont to yak about how Biden, whom he called "Poopy Pants," shit himself: personally I'm pretty sure EB is projecting.
For the 10000th time could it theoretically happen is not the same as did it happen. This is not going to be rehashed yet again. There are tons of reasons your story is verging on not possible ( but ues theotetically speaking it is). I discussed in detail what might have happened and perhaps what I feel has happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMy handle is a nickname that my late partner gave me 20 years ago, when we met. Nothing more. But that wont stop you from making up whatever you want.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One final thing and then I am done with you for today, hopefully longer. And it is back to the automatic shuffle machine.
Have you ever even played blackjack against such a machine? If you had you would know that these machines have the ability built in to restack the cards in sequential order by suit. And if they have that capability, they have the capability to stack cards in any order desired. As soon as someone realizes they had that first ability to stack cards in sequential order, everyone playing against them should have been concerned. I knew what was up long before I proved it with the help of the programmer/tech guy.
The big question is why would a shuffle machine have that ability? There is no legitimate reason. These machines could detect a missing card without having card readers (at extra expense), so that reason doesn't fly.
anyway, you are nuts. Have a good day.
Why sort the deck? So your dealers don't have to do it? Doh.
You are conflating the ability to shuffle with reading the cards.
For one lol if you can't read the cards then someone could swap out cards hoping to not get caught. You can't sort decks to save labor. Sorting decks by hand is yet a other procedure with protocols
It is an interesting question about whether those extra capabilities are worth the suspicion but that sort of nuanced discussion flies over your head. Therefore not worth having.
Trump has won 2 elections. One against a white woman, one against a black woman. In neither case did he get 50% of the vote, although he did better against the black woman at least getting more votes that she did.
But you have to wonder...what is the common denominator? Maybe a woman opponent? (I say a chunk of the electorate just isn't ready for that yet).
Now lets put that theory to the test. How did Trump do against a white male....the very weakest that dems could muster? hum?
So to fix this rather glaring situations, don't be surprised if Democrtas come back with another woman, like Michele Obama. :D
At Yard House Restaurant I dropped about $91 on a meal for just myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNot how deals work. You have to give something. $200 in this case. Enough for a great steak. Without drinks maybe he can bring his wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
That's not acceptable.
Here are the original terms...it's all on record in this thread...
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Roughly $4 coke
Roughly$36 bone in ribeye steak and fries
Roughly $7 chicken tenders and fries
Roughly $14 for fried calamari
$9.99 brookie and ice cream.
:)
:) So yeah, $200 is more than enough for two adults at the Yard House Restaurant. :) And a third adult can have fried calamari, or two orders of chicken tenders with the leftover change. :)
Doesn’t count as a chicken joint, BUT you had chicken which leads to the obvious question……Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaAt Yard House Restaurant I dropped about $91 on a meal for just myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNot how deals work. You have to give something. $200 in this case. Enough for a great steak. Without drinks maybe he can bring his wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Roughly $4 coke
Roughly$36 bone in ribeye steak and fries
Roughly $7 chicken tenders and fries
Roughly $14 for fried calamari
$9.99 brookie and ice cream.
:)
:) So yeah, $200 is more than enough for two adults at the Yard House Restaurant. :)
Did you shit on the floor?
And who the fuck eats that much at one sitting? Had to be 4-5000 calories.
I was EXTREMELY hungry that day and no, I NEVER shit on the floor, that was a joke that someone came up for me when they saw a social media post about someone shitting on the floor at a Church's Restaurant. I NEVER did that and I find it unfair that the joke spun way out of control when I wasn't even the one who did that. I even abandoned Poker Fraud Alert because they were repeating the same joke even after I repeatedly said that it wasn't me who did it and politely asked them to stop. They kept going so I abandoned Poker Fraud Alert over this harassing joke.Quote:
Originally Posted by The BozDoesn’t count as a chicken joint, BUT you had chicken which leads to the obvious question……Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaAt Yard House Restaurant I dropped about $91 on a meal for just myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Roughly $4 coke
Roughly$36 bone in ribeye steak and fries
Roughly $7 chicken tenders and fries
Roughly $14 for fried calamari
$9.99 brookie and ice cream.
:)
:) So yeah, $200 is more than enough for two adults at the Yard House Restaurant. :)
Did you shit on the floor?
And who the fuck eats that much at one sitting? Had to be 4-5000 calories.
Given your seeming sensitivity to insult one has to wonder why you haven't yet abandoned VCT?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Not that you SHOULD...
Yeah, I mock you but at the end of the day..."It don't mean nothin;..."
This thread got hacked EXTREMELY badly. It started off being about a bus that goes to Anaheim and to Las Vegas and delved into Posters hurling insults at each other! :eek: :confused:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Karen boarded the bus to LV and gnawed on a greasy leg of Church's chicken.
"Dem AP's, 'dey sho' gwine be s'prised when I and I shows up" she cackled, grease dripping down her face.
She espied one empty seat: "Is 'dis here chair taken?" she asked the swarthy old fart who sat next to it; "I and I doesn't feels so good. I and I needs to sit down."
Karen let loose a melodic albeit rather stinky toot: she tried hard to keep it in the right key, smiling at her success.
Rob moaned loudly then started hacking and histrionically coughed up some phlegm on the empty seat; "I won't share with anybody" he mused silently over his pre-emptive strike.
"Oh, 'dat's nothin', y'all should sees my kitchen flo' " said the wannabe AP while plopping her derriere onto the saliva; "My name be karen, what be yours?"
"Puddin' Tame; ask me again and I'll tell you the same."
"Well Mr. Tame, is you gwine to Las Vegas to gambles, like I and I is, or has you some other reason to go 'dere?"
"Leave me alone, woman...can't you see that I'm a white man? The nerve of you people..."
With that Rob once again started flaming strangers online, chuckling and playing with himself all the while,
"I and I guess we really is all bozos on 'dis bus" murmured Karen as her stomach rumbled: she eyed the floor of the bus and began to loosen the knot on the draw string of her filthy sweat pants.
"I and I gwine to give 'dis mothafucka somethin' he never fo'get..."
Mr. C, Dan said that racist posts were supposed to cease and desist. Your latest post was HIGHLY racist. :/
Who is Mr. C?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Anyway, my little tales are funny and that fact should count for something, and besides, they get viewed, which is the name of the game for a forum.
Karen, all protection evaporated when Our Fearless Leader, Herr Trump, got rid of all the D.E.I. bullshit via executive order: it's a New World today, one where only the strongest will survive; a new world where the Little People like you will be forced to mow our lawns and cook our meals now that Herr Trump is kicking the illegals out.
I suggest you get ahead of the game; quit Walgreens and either buy a lawn mower and an old pick up truck or enroll in culinary courses: you can thank me later.
Time for you to step up while I chill out.
Is this a great courntry or what?
What?
Come on. Mr. C was Richie Cunningham's father on the show Happy Days, which I only saw in re-runs. Remember Fonzie saying "heeeeeyyy Mr C"?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
It is crazy. He's even getting rid of courses on the WASPs. An old friend of mine had a grandmother who was in that. women who flew military craft domestically to free up men overseas. but nah.. gotta erase the textbooks I guess. lol. I just sit back and laugh. This country is going to backwards. I think the acronym is WASP.. yea. BUt they're removing it from courses and stuff. like just wow. crazy shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVWho is Mr. C?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
Anyway, my little tales are funny and that fact should count for something, and besides, they get viewed, which is the name of the game for a forum.
Karen, all protection evaporated when Our Fearless Leader, Herr Trump, got rid of all the D.E.I. bullshit via executive order: it's a New World today, one where only the strongest will survive; a new world where the Little People like you will be forced to mow our lawns and cook our meals now that Herr Trump is kicking the illegals out.
I suggest you get ahead of the game; quit Walgreens and either buy a lawn mower and an old pick up truck or enroll in culinary courses: you can thank me later.
Time for you to step up while I chill out.
Is this a great courntry or what?
What?
Trump is keeping campaign promises. New presidents have the right to make some changes. I know Rob and Mickey are pleased with some of his actions, like throwing out some illegals. Is he overstepping? I don't know. That will be for the courts, including the SC that he stacked, to decide.
The thing I am waiting for is Trump to decide to try to cut or eliminate Social security. Not hoping for because my mother is of social security age, but waiting for. I wonder how happy his older Maga base will feel about that?
And make no mistake, cuts to social security have been on the republicans agenda since George Bush was president. It has been a main goal of the Heritage foundation for decades. The same Heritage foundation that wrote the 2025 playbook. I think for the most part the Heritage foundation is interested in raising the retirement age and privatization, which they began proposing during George W Bushes term.
Now Elon Musk is even a bigger danger to those on social security. He just wants to end it as a means to reduce debt. He doesn't even try to hide it. He says things like it will be painful and "everyone will take a hair cut". For retirees that haircut will be at the neck line. I mean this is a guy that buys a company and on day 1 lays off 80% of the workforce, so what does he care. Won't affect him.
Now Donald has vowed during the election NOT to cut social security. I believe he said "not one penny". But does anybody have any confidence in Donald keeping his word? :D Additionally, people around Trump claim that whoever last has his ear effects each decision. Retirees better hope that Musk isn't the last person in his ear on this one.
And for people that say, Trump won't cut SS because it would hit his base. He is now done with that base. Doesn't need them anymore. If he stays in power past 2028, it won't be because he wins another election, it will be because he violates the constitution and stays in power, something he has tried before. :rolleyes:
So Like I said, it will affect me, because it will affect my mother. But we will survive. I am waiting to see how his supporters and admirers feel when their checks stop coming. A lot of retirees will have to move back in with their children. Rob Singer got a head start on that. :D
Well that’s great news!Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaAt Yard House Restaurant I dropped about $91 on a meal for just myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNot how deals work. You have to give something. $200 in this case. Enough for a great steak. Without drinks maybe he can bring his wife.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Roughly $4 coke
Roughly$36 bone in ribeye steak and fries
Roughly $7 chicken tenders and fries
Roughly $14 for fried calamari
$9.99 brookie and ice cream.
:)
:) So yeah, $200 is more than enough for two adults at the Yard House Restaurant. :) And a third adult can have fried calamari, or two orders of chicken tenders with the leftover change. :)
I’m assuming that means your financial crisis from having a 91 cent overdraft (or however much it was) is way behind you now?
You are probably not too far off. Last election the Democrats shrank in every single demographic except white college educated voters making over $100,000 per year.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
If they get started now and stay very focused they can probably come up with a 2028 candidate that can shrink that demographic too while also continuing to shrink in all the others
She just wanted to brag about her big meal not realizing how it just sorta sounds gross. 2 friends things and a steak + ice cream. Tasha will never save a dime.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenWell that’s great news!Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaAt Yard House Restaurant I dropped about $91 on a meal for just myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Roughly $4 coke
Roughly$36 bone in ribeye steak and fries
Roughly $7 chicken tenders and fries
Roughly $14 for fried calamari
$9.99 brookie and ice cream.
:)
:) So yeah, $200 is more than enough for two adults at the Yard House Restaurant. :) And a third adult can have fried calamari, or two orders of chicken tenders with the leftover change. :)
I’m assuming that means your financial crisis from having a 91 cent overdraft (or however much it was) is way behind you now?
Maybe the gay guy, butt-a-giggy could achieve that. If a chunk of the electorate isn't ready for a woman, surely they are not ready for a gay president (although by all accounts we have already had one).Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenYou are probably not too far off. Last election the Democrats shrank in every single demographic except white college educated voters making over $100,000 per year.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
If they get started now and stay very focused they can probably come up with a 2028 candidate that can shrink that demographic too while also continuing to shrink in all the others
And if a gay guy isn't enough to shrink those electorates, maybe go even bigger and go for a black gay guy. That would surely do it. :D
You are definitely on the right track, but since they were ok electing a black guy, and a walking corpse, I have a gut filling that a gay guy could win easier than a woman,Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMaybe the gay guy, butt-a-giggy could achieve that. If a chunk of the electorate isn't ready for a woman, surely they are not ready for a gay president (although by all accounts we have already had one).Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenYou are probably not too far off. Last election the Democrats shrank in every single demographic except white college educated voters making over $100,000 per year.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
If they get started now and stay very focused they can probably come up with a 2028 candidate that can shrink that demographic too while also continuing to shrink in all the others
And if a gay guy isn't enough to shrink those electorates, maybe go even bigger and go for a black gay guy. That would surely do it. :D
They should go for a Lesbian Black Woman or even better a trans or non binary black person.
Fucking trans and non-binary. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
I am a man without a party. I consider myself financially conservative but socially liberal. Financially more in tune with Republicans, although they really aren't financially conservative any more. They spend just as much, just differently. Socially, as a gay guy, I am a "live and let live" type person. During the 20+ years of my voting adult life, republican anti-gay stances have always pushed me towards the democrats, beginning with Carl Rove in the second Bush election.
But the Democrats embracement of Trans and non-binary is just becoming too much for me. I don't even know what the fuck non-binary is....even after looking it up. And Trans people just creep me out, both ways. I know they have a letter in the LBG alphabet that I am a part of, but the whole concept just freaks me out. I don't even like hearing the word, let alone looking at a trans person. And this is in great conflict with my live and let live approach, but I can't help it. I don't wish anybody any harm, but I would just as leave never hear the word or see another trans person.
Two of the bigger issues in the news in the last week are what bathroom the trans "lady" elected to congress from Delaware would use and trans people in the military. WTF!!! Don't we have bigger issues to deal with?
I agree, Democrats have just gone completely off the rails with this trans stuff. I think most Americans regardless of politics don’t really care about anyones sexual identity, interests, etcQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJFucking trans and non-binary. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
I am a man without a party. I consider myself financially conservative but socially liberal. Financially more in tune with Republicans, although they really aren't financially conservative any more. They spend just as much, just differently. Socially, as a gay guy, I am a "live and let live" type person. During the 20+ years of my voting adult life, republican anti-gay stances have always pushed me towards the democrats, beginning with Carl Rove in the second Bush election.
But the Democrats embracement of Trans and non-binary is just becoming too much for me. I don't even know what the fuck non-binary is....even after looking it up. And Trans people just creep me out, both ways. I know they have a letter in the LBG alphabet that I am a part of, but the whole concept just freaks me out. I don't even like hearing the word, let alone looking at a trans person. And this is in great conflict with my live and let live approach, but I can't help it. I don't wish anybody any harm, but I would just as leave never hear the word or see another trans person.
Two of the bigger issues in the news in the last week are what bathroom the trans "lady" elected to congress from Delaware would use and trans people in the military. WTF!!! Don't we have bigger issues to deal with?
But when you start sexualizing children, letting men into women’s sports & prisons, having tuck friendly children’s swim suits at the store, and just generally cramming all this sexual stuff down everyone’s throat, people get sick of it.
Particularly when it’s this bizarre whacked out stuff that should be kept in peoples bedrooms.
I mean, even J Edgar Hoover was rumored to be both gay & a cross dresser, but he kept that shit in the bedroom where it belongs.
Trump has said over and over again no cuts to SS. He just said it again yesterday. Trump keeps his campaign promises. Don't waste your time worrying about Trump cutting SS. Worry about what will happen to SS in 2034 long after he is out of office.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Pleased with some of his actions?
Formed the External Revenue Agency to collect money owed to us by foreigners and foreign nations.
Trump sworn in Monday, ICE started removing illegals wednesday
Suspended security clearances of 51 officials that lied about Hunter's laptop.
Pardoned J6 defendents
Created DOGE
Declared a national emergency at the southern border.
Designated Mexican cartels as terrorist groups.
Ended"Catch and Release"
Reinstituted"Remain in Mexico"
Ordered the military to the border
Reinstituted death penalty for illegals who commit capital crimes
Gulf of America
Ended DEI in federal government
Changed federal policy to recognize only 2 sexes, male and female
Ended electric vehicle mandate
Withdrew from Paris Climate Accords
Lifted ban on offshore drilling
Ended ban on natural gas exports
Removed pride flags from all federal buildings
Revoked the Global Minimum Tax
Fired 20 DOJ officials
Fired 18 Inspector Generals
Brought aid to NC hurricane victims and California fire victims
Ordered DOJ to investigate state and local officials that don't cooperate with federal law
Slapped Columbia with tariffs and sanctions for not taking back illegals
And that's just his first week. We now have a president that actually works.
I don't know what you do with the prison situation. But men into women's sports, makes me laugh. This was a big republican talking point during the election. Of course, people born male shouldn't be playing in female sports. But it sounds like a made-up problem to me. Where is this happening? Are there people born male that play in the WNBA? People born male that play in professional women's tennis or golf? I haven't heard of any of that. Do the Olympics allow people born male to perform in female sports? I haven't heard that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Is it happening at the college level? I haven't heard and am not familiar. Is it happening at the high school level? Maybe it is, but I haven't heard of it. And if it is at high school level, that goes into a whole other problem area for me. People should not be allowed to be changing sex under the age of 18 (if at all). We have laws that say you can't smoke until 18, can't drink until 21. Why would it be ok to cut off your dick or sew up your vagina or whatever they do at younger than 18? :confused:
Most of this shit is just common sense. If you are born a guy and attracted to guys you are gay. If you are born female and attracted to females, you are gay (lesbian). This happens naturally in humans as well as animals. It doesn't mean you cut off your dick and try to become a female or someone born female have whatever operations to try to become male.