LuxBus Review

[accountinquestion]

Yay redietz posted. Crazily he rants about anonymity but in a way that is quite reasonable.

Now I can go to bed and deal with unpleasant real life tomorrow.

But yea AI is bleak. For so many reasons. Honestly I should write a blog.

[accountinquestion]

I'll have the 4th post here upon receipt of $200

That's not acceptable.

Here are the original terms...it's all on record in this thread...

Post their screen names, how much $ you need to ask them to corroborate your stories, and whatever payment instructions you have.

Not how deals work. You have to give something. $200 in this case. Enough for a great steak. Without drinks maybe he can bring his wife.

[kewlJ]

I have yet to see him be accused of making up the quotes. This is your new tactic.. your attempts to discredit others don't work at all anymore.

Well then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.

That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.

Here is an example of Dawgs troll games: Mdawg has posted a quote from my account at another forum, talking about moving to Las Vegas in 2014 after graduating college, which of course contradicts the fact that I moved here in 2009. BUT, that post was made by my brother. He is the one that graduated college in 2014 and moved to Vegas at that time. AND he identified at the start of the post that it was him speaking, not me. Dawg conveniently left that part out.

Your stupidity, in not knowing what he is doing, is astounding. Everyone else has figured it out....why haven't you?

[accountinquestion]

I have yet to see him be accused of making up the quotes. This is your new tactic.. your attempts to discredit others don't work at all anymore.

Well then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.

That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.

And you just said he doesn't make them up. Out of context and all that -Ok! You've said so much over the years .. mdawg will be able to clear it up when he's back. I'm sure. He's sadistic but my empathy for you is so tapped. At this point it has crossed over into some weird form of performance art.

[coach belly]

You have to give something. $200 in this case.

You incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.

Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.

Am I clear?

[kewlJ]

Why does coach belly, and at times others like Redietz, think anyone on an anonymous internet forum needs to provide proof of anything? I never understood that. It's like they think different people are on trial and they are the judge.

next question: What difference does it even make if accountinQ has met several people on this forum?

I don't doubt that AinQ has met some people. But guess what, it still doesn't change that a lot of what he says is bullshit or not true and that most of it is just trolling. Just like Dawg has met someone from WoV (The guy that used to own the forum), but still everything he claims is bullshit.

hey Rob met Alan, and who knows who else. Does that mean Rob's claims are not bullshit? of course NOT.

First of all, this forum was founded on the premise that it was NOT an "anonymous internet forum." The main poster, Alan Mendelson, was NOT anonymous. The next most common posters were NOT anonymous. Alan Mendelson, Singer, the guy running the video poker and slot teams, the Dice Influencing writer and team captain, myself, and others -- none of us were anonymous. Let me repeat that -- the MAJORITY of the primary posters were NOT anonymous. This held true for years.

That's not even counting people like mickey or (on other forums) "Jean Scott," who, while not using their real names, are not exactly "anonymous forum posters."

This forum devolved into the anonymous fairy tale forum when the low-end, "maybe I'm a pro" alleged "APs" decided it was their preferred bedroom for nighty-night stories. With no evidence. With no corroboration. With no actual verification of anything. With banal, no-detail explications, like kewlJ's, and so on.

So kewlJ's little observation and question is not only historically incorrect (surprise, surprise as Gomer Pyle would say), but utter bullshit, as per usual.

But allow me to properly frame his question, "Why would anyone on a formerly not anonymous forum request proof of anything?" Because some people don't like the idea that they are wasting their time reading fairy tales.

Addendum note: This entire topic is going to spin out of control soon enough. Within months, forums are going to be deluged with traffic-generating AI posts being assigned to various handles under the auspices of human posting. Much, if not most, of your posting will likely be in response to some auto-program, sucking minutes and hours out of your life that could be spent actually interacting with human beings (some with actual names). There will be no way to figure out when or if a person is doing the actual posting, so people can just bleed off their time responding to things not written by people.

Red, I am NOT even going to get into this shit again with you. I trust that your not understanding why a real AP would need to maintain anonymity when posting on a public gambling forum is just something that you don't understand because you are not an AP making a living off casinos in the same manner that we do.

But I will tell you this, when I came to this forum, you Red claimed that you knew how card counting worked and had done some at times. I have no idea what levels of amounts, but enough that you claimed to know how it works in regards to casinos and heat and all that. And you said that what I claimed was exactly the way it worked. I can pull up some quotes if your memory is failing you. You also seemed to have some understanding of tracking a second table, and defended that against people like Alan, that were claiming you needed super powers to do so.

So it seems you understood....at least until you decided not to or to pretend not to. And it is no coincidence that that flip occurred when I moved into a little bit of sports betting AP play last year. THAT is when you turned on me and other APs. Like how dare we move into your sports betting territory. And it wasn't that you turned. You can like or not like whoever you want, but you started going along with the lies that you KNEW were lies and even adding to them. Completely flip-flopping on things you had previously said.

Red, I don't have a huge issue with you, other than you are now being retarded towards not only me, but any AP that dares do some sports betting at an advantage. Get the fuck over it!

[kewlJ]

You have to give something. $200 in this case.

You incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.

Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.

Am I clear?

Did I miss where coach belly purchased this forum and now makes the rules?

[kewlJ]

I have yet to see him be accused of making up the quotes. This is your new tactic.. your attempts to discredit others don't work at all anymore.

Well then you are NOT paying attention. Dawg posts partial quotes taken out of context....ALOT! Several people including Axelwolf at times asked him to stop misrepresenting them, but he did not. Other times he quotes other trolls that have made up lies, like seedvalue, the late moses, people on other forums that have never even participated here and even himself. That is correct. he will post quotes of himself stating made up lies and untruths, as if that means anything.

That you put any stock in that shit is....well I can't even come up with the words. You are fucking retarded.

And you just said he doesn't make them up. Out of context and all that -Ok! You've said so much over the years .. mdawg will be able to clear it up when he's back. I'm sure.

Dawg can't and won't clear anything up because he can't. he might lie some more....that is usually what he does.

Look it is not that difficult. Even you should be able to figure this out. Lets examine basic gambling claims. Forget all the nonsense like that i surfed when a teenager, or who I choose to love and live with. Just basic gambling claims.

Dawg: That he gambles high limits and wins 90+% of his days/sessions totaling millions of dollars. (he is over $600,000 just for this year on about 10 days play). AND that he plays rated so casino know exactly what he wins, in the hi limit rooms were there are half dozen sets of eyes on a player like him, and he wins and wins and wins, and casinos love him. Pit folks love him and comp him out the ass. Never any heat or counter-measures. He is NOT in the databases.

Now compare that to me.

KewlJ: Midlevel card counter/advantage player for most of my time here in Vegas (play a bit different and higher stakes now). I played unrated, moved around A LOT! Short sessions. Trying to minimize attention drawn. And when an issue did arise, I would not play that casino for a period. I have been backed off probably 70+ times, trespassed and back roomed once (same casino). Sort of 86ed from another, at least to their thinking. I have multiple entries in several different databases. Everything I do is designed toward longevity, including playing unrated and giving up comps and EV.


Now which of these sounds like reality to you and which seems like some sort of James Bond "Hollywood" adventure? And guess what, the word "adventure" is the title of his long running thread.

Now once you figure that out and again, everyone has except you, then why on earth would you be going down each of these rabbit holes that he creates to deflect? Are you really this stupid? Or just pretending as part of your troll activities.

Any player, recreational to professional knows casinos just do not let players win what dawg claims in the manner he claims. Some players (APs) do win, but they have to work at it. No one is patting them on the back and handing buckets of money and comps on top.

One final thing for your consideration. Throughout the 5 years Dawg has stated or hinted at several different ways he gains and advantage. Everything from rebates, to card counting, to voodoo nonsense like "betting into hot streaks". In the last year he has settled on that he is rain man with total recall of every card played. Whether you want to be the one person that believes that is up to you, but for sake of this exercise, lets just say it were true. He is rain man.

Would casinos still allow him to win every day as he claims even if they could not figure out how he was winning? Is THAT really the way casinos work?

And no, I don't expect you will cease trolling and answer any of these questions honestly. But my point is that once you figure this out, why would you go down each of these rabbit holes he creates. I guess you have already answered. You are trolling.

[mcap]

You have to give something. $200 in this case.

You incur no expense by posting the names, so I won't advance a fee to post them.

Either follow the original terms or excuse yourself from this forum.

Am I clear?

Did I miss where coach belly purchased this forum and now makes the rules?

PRIVATE messages have NO expectation of privacy on this forum!!!!!!!

[Rob.Singer]

Why is this even a discussion?

If meeting with or having telecons with AQ were a special kinda thing, I'd have done something like that long ago.

And why resurrect kew again, when we had the weakling who can never do what he says he's gonna do, right where he was wanted?

[MDawg]

No one with any sense cottons to outed compulsively lying sociopaths, making comments on anything, at all.

So, 'git, like you said you would. The End.

Not me, I am out!

[MDawg]

Only a person who cannot control his bowel movements, let alone his actions, would keep vowing to never return to a forum, never respond to so and so (including to MDawg and R.Singer), and yet keep breaking his vows.

She’s an embarrassment an indecisive twit to end all indecisive twits.

Even UNKewlJ himself must realize that he's not right in the head, to say constantly that he will do this or that, and then stand by helplessly as he can't keep to any sort of resolve...about anything.

Can't you imagine this indecisive twit at the tables, putting one hand up to his face, the other propped against his side, and declaring in his high pitched whiny voice, "Well I just don't KNOWW if I should hit or stay?"

[DGenBen]

I saw Singer one time.

Was heading to Reno & saw this Newell driving up the mountain, tried to peer in the window & the guy did look just like Singer.

Went to grab my phone to snap a picture, but too dangerous to do that on those mountain roads while driving & plus he was in the slow lane, the Newell goes up the mountain pretty slow compared to all the other traffic.

[The Boz]

By the way RED, your PM’s are full again.

[mickeycrimm]

What do you disagree about?

I disagree that mickey seems to believe. To me, it doesn't seem like he believes.

But I'm more interested in your meeting with mickey.

Considering that virtually none of the members here have met, your meeting in the wild was extraordinary.

But there is a suspicious lack of information about that meeting.

monet meets nobody Axel, and a no holds barred adventures thread follows.

You meet the legendary mickey crimm, and there's a media blackout...no info, other than that you met.

That's suspicious...don't you agree?

I think it was 4 or 5 years ago now. I was at Choctaw Casino, Durant, Oklahoma, with 7500 machines the 2nd largest casino in the world. I was on a play. Can't remember what it was. Someone from behind asked me if I was Mickey Crimm. It was AQ.

So we had a conversation about machines. Talked about several of them. Can't remember what I told him. He told me about a game I was aware of but hadn't had time to analyze yet. But he couldn't tell me for sure if the game was profitable. He just thought it might be possible. We hit a burger joint and both got orders to go. I went to my room. The whole encounter probably wasn't more than an hour.

I later analyzed the game and worked it into my repertoire. It was a good card builder/comp runner. I'll show the game in it's own thread.

Yesterday I took AQ off ignore well over the month I said I would keep him on it. I went over posts he made shortly after I had informed him that I was putting him on ignore. I was looking to see if he quit with the gratuitous trolling.

I found a post he made to KJ where he said "Guess who showed Mickey that game?" It was the game he told me about at Choctaw. Well, yes, he did tell me the game existed. But nothing else. He didn't really know anything about it, just that it might be a play. He didn't give me any stats or entry points or anything.

Sure, thanks, AQ, for pointing out the game. You are one of many who have pointed out games to me over the years. I always love analyzing new games. And the game did work out.

I'm on a forum of machine pros that's behind a paywall. Except, I have a free honorary membership. I'm anonymous on the forum except the Administrator knows who I am. I give advice on plays but I also get to keep abreast of the new cutting edge games that hit the casino floors. I've always been a sponge for information no matter where it comes from, even from AQ.

[mickeycrimm]

When you put someone on Ignore this is what you get to see (see pick below). You can't ignore them fully because a message pops up that a person you put on ignore just made a post. WTF is that? I put the person on ignore so I could ignore them. And not to be reminded everytime an ignored person makes a post.

And then, you can see that KJ makes a post where he quoted the person I have on ignore. So you have the person on ignore but there's a text box with the ignoree's text in it anytime someone quote's him. Fuck me running.

Putting someone on Ignore doesn't really mean you get to ignore them fully.

On Twitter, when you put someone on ignore, you never see anything from them. It's like they disappeared into outer space. That's the way all these forums should be.

[kewlJ]

I think it was 4 or 5 years ago now. I was at Choctaw Casino, Durant, Oklahoma, with 7500 machines the 2nd largest casino in the world. I was on a play. Can't remember what it was. Someone from behind asked me if I was Mickey Crimm. It was AQ.

So we had a conversation about machines. Talked about several of them. Can't remember what I told him. He told me about a game I was aware of but hadn't had time to analyze yet. But he couldn't tell me for sure if the game was profitable. He just thought it might be possible. We hit a burger joint and both got orders to go. I went to my room. The whole encounter probably wasn't more than an hour.

I am going to repeat, that approaching an AP in a casino while he is playing, like AQ did seems pretty amateurish and inappropriate to me.

In the instance described above, just suppose player A, mickeycrimm was on the casinos radar as an advantage player, but they hadn't gotten around to taking any action against him yet, but were just "watching him". Now player B, comes up and has a conversation with him. Now they begin to take a look at players B's play. Player B could wind up in a database listed as an "associate" of Player A, just as happened to my friend from a blackjack forum.

I don't know....maybe it is different for machine players. As a table game player, I would NEVER do that. It has the potential to damage both players.

I have had someone call me by my online handle in a casino at least twice that I remember. I ignored both parties. Didn't even flinch or act like it had any meaning to me. It may very well have been someone from one of the forums, making the same inappropriate move AQ did, but my gut tells me there is a better than 50/50 chance it was someone from the casino looking for a reaction.

Doing or saying something looking for or to see if there is a reaction is a common tactic for casinos. I have mentioned the tactic of casino pit coming to the table and flipping through discard tray. Common wisdom is that they are looking to see if there are more low cards in the tray, which would make the remaining cards favorable to the player. But more often than not that aren't even really doing that. They just want to see what reaction it gets. They do the same thing with comments. Sometimes a pit person will make a very mild comment about card counting, to see if it spooks the player or not.

Again, my experiences are based on my table game player career and experiences. Maybe it is very appropriate for machine players to do what AQ did. I don't know. I wouldn't be happy about it.

[accountinquestion]

What do you disagree about?

I disagree that mickey seems to believe. To me, it doesn't seem like he believes.

But I'm more interested in your meeting with mickey.

Considering that virtually none of the members here have met, your meeting in the wild was extraordinary.

But there is a suspicious lack of information about that meeting.

monet meets nobody Axel, and a no holds barred adventures thread follows.

You meet the legendary mickey crimm, and there's a media blackout...no info, other than that you met.

That's suspicious...don't you agree?

I think it was 4 or 5 years ago now. I was at Choctaw Casino, Durant, Oklahoma, with 7500 machines the 2nd largest casino in the world. I was on a play. Can't remember what it was. Someone from behind asked me if I was Mickey Crimm. It was AQ.

So we had a conversation about machines. Talked about several of them. Can't remember what I told him. He told me about a game I was aware of but hadn't had time to analyze yet. But he couldn't tell me for sure if the game was profitable. He just thought it might be possible. We hit a burger joint and both got orders to go. I went to my room. The whole encounter probably wasn't more than an hour.

I later analyzed the game and worked it into my repertoire. It was a good card builder/comp runner. I'll show the game in it's own thread.

Yesterday I took AQ off ignore well over the month I said I would keep him on it. I went over posts he made shortly after I had informed him that I was putting him on ignore. I was looking to see if he quit with the gratuitous trolling.

I found a post he made to KJ where he said "Guess who showed Mickey that game?" It was the game he told me about at Choctaw. Well, yes, he did tell me the game existed. But nothing else. He didn't really know anything about it, just that it might be a play. He didn't give me any stats or entry points or anything.

Sure, thanks, AQ, for pointing out the game. You are one of many who have pointed out games to me over the years. I always love analyzing new games. And the game did work out.

I'm on a forum of machine pros that's behind a paywall. Except, I have a free honorary membership. I'm anonymous on the forum except the Administrator knows who I am. I give advice on plays but I also get to keep abreast of the new cutting edge games that hit the casino floors. I've always been a sponge for information no matter where it comes from, even from AQ.

I 100% knew that game was profitable and a play. It was one of my favorite games. I like how in your head you've told yourself some version of it like I needed your help in some fashion .. like you're the jedi-master of games or something. lol. I would not have necessarily known floor entry points on the bottom end but I definitely knew when it would be a play. I only brought it up recently because it had been brought up in the thread that I was being accused of being an imposter of some sort. (no, I don't recall) So me pointing out that I showed Mickey the same game Mickey had brought up in that thread was kinda an indication that at least I don't make up shit. I don't even really tell stories. I don't have many to say. I believe even when I brought it up again I said made some form of a disclaimer to make it clear I wasn't trying to imply I taught Mickey much of anything or whatever. Of course when he unblocked me he went back and read all those messages (lol ) And even with my disclaimer it bothered his self-image as game jedi-master. So so much that he returned to the subject because he had found it discussion worthy.

Then we got Kewl posting later in this thread opining about how bad of an idea if it was to talk to Mickey. "What if he was on their radar". I could pick this apart as how asinine this is but it goes to show how shallow Kewl's understanding is of anything. Again though - much like Mickey - his opinions (Mickey's memory) is very self-serving. Kewl sees himself as some wizard of casinos because hes spent decades on the internet reading about blackjack and tries to extrapolate that into wider casino operations. I could go into details why Kewl is sooo wrong and why it really shouldn't be a concern but I have no desire to seed his brain with reality or go off on subjects not already being discussed. Of course we have to endure his teachable moment that he pulls out of his ass every time. No real AP would do that because they'd have a sense for the situation and not consider it being worth discussing. Not Kewl though. He sees a way to distinguish himself as mr worldy casino guy so he talks out of his ass.

People say I'm a troll but in general I'm just straight forward and factual. I was that time. And I typically am. Mickey started going on into fake news related things regarding Pete Hegseth and I corrected him. I do not like incompetents being in charge of my country and I will speak up. That doesn't make me a troll. People just don't want to hear it. Mickey has been misdirected in his intake of fake media and often doesn't understand what the real issues are. I clarified. Then he claims I'm the troll... then why did he bring up Pete Hegseth , lapdog of the elites, and fuckup employee of multiple veterans non-profits? You can't have it both ways. Well some think they can but they shouldn't be crying troll! troll! troll!. Kewl does this same shit all the time too.

[accountinquestion]

And this is much like a week ago when Half-smoke brought up AI. I prefaced my post with 'take this with a grain of salt'. I seem to recall the Hong Kong guys had racing times that were at a higher granularity than what was publicly available. Of course I was open to misremembering but the point was that this sort of data would likely also be needed for an effective AI to be created.

But here comes Redietz! He thinks the discussion is about the guys who beat Hong Kong racing (and which he likely knows more about me) and then goes out of his way to be an obnoxious troll. lol. He has something to prove !! Just like Kewl in this thread !! and to a lesser degree like Mickey.

So I just spent the next few posts clowning on Redietz because it is too easy and he had asked for it. Yet, when he claimed he wouldn't post again, I'm sure it is because of "AIQ the troll". Maybe not. Some sort of victim shit - that much I do recall. I come here for entertainment and smetimes to read something factually interesting. I'm never hear to prove shit. I don't care. I have nothing to prove. I've never claimed to be a professional gambler while on this forum. I don't talk about things I have no clue about.

[MDawg]

the king of lying

has been

making his life about lying on forums.