Exactly!
https://twitter.com/jimmy_dore/statu...74176904814594
Printable View
He spit in Alex Jones's face because it was the thing to do. Now he has decided being Alex Jones is the thing to do.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
$$$$$$$
Completely agree with Barnes as usual.
If they are so safe and effective, why all the secrecy and why are they so scared of going to court?
The batch numbers are insane.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4kN68kWEkU
I love it. Good video to show morons. As soon as he starts talking about how "they" used to talk about global cooling you know it is another fucking clown show. Global cooling... as if it was ever an actual thing but hey somewhere some dude mentioned it. Therefore invalidating everything else.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
You can use this sort of reasoning to invalidate just about anything.. At some point in the past, some group of some size somewhere said something contrarian therefore...
Either the man is stupid as fuck or he panders to those who are ...... Thanks Monet, good video.
Yanno I want to like Carlin. Years ago was a huge fan. I can laugh at woke culture as much as anyone but he says doing something to save a species is nonsensical because doing something in the first place is what caused the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Jokes don't offend me but the way he presents it is as if he is actually making a valid point. As if he has some smart observation.
So I'm listening to it kinda loling then you actually follow through what he says.. let me give an example. Lets apply what he says.
Ok buffalo hunters killed 99% of the buffalo so why should we stop buffalo hunters from killing the last 1%. Because it was our buffalo hunters who started this in the first place. It is THE HEIGHT of arrogance to think that we should save the buffalos when our meddling is what started this mess.
HUH
Now aint that fuckin dumb?
And Carlin goes around like he's some smart comic. I was a big fan then he had his show and I watched it and found the guy to be a lame sell-out but it had nothing to do with politics.
BTW environmentalism has nothing to do with woke culture. If you think it does, you're just another tribal clown. When Carlin did this woke culture wasn't even a thing at all but the click-bait title is what you need.
France is getting it pretty bad. There are going to be some big losers and not so big losers as this plays out.
https://www.euronews.com/green/2023/...arming-by-2100
Never heard this one before but I love it.
And I've used the Original Listerine for over 40 years...
Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Imagine if that ran today how fast it would get canceled.
Humor is not allowed anymore except super G rated humor that also is not associated with any particular age, race, sexuality (or lack thereof), gender (or lack thereof), nationality (or lack thereof) and probably about 100 other classifications.
No Doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenLol.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Imagine if that ran today how fast it would get canceled.
Humor is not allowed anymore except super G rated humor that also is not associated with any particular age, race, sexuality (or lack thereof), gender (or lack thereof), nationality (or lack thereof) and probably about 100 other classifications.
Very True.
I saw this one recently.
Makes Sense.
This should get a response from tableplay.
I don't own any ARs though, all AKs for me.
I think Bill (Clinton not Yung) should have been added to that meme: "Statistically you are more likely to be killed by Billary . . . "Quote:
Originally Posted by monetNo Doubt.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenLol.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Imagine if that ran today how fast it would get canceled.
Humor is not allowed anymore except super G rated humor that also is not associated with any particular age, race, sexuality (or lack thereof), gender (or lack thereof), nationality (or lack thereof) and probably about 100 other classifications.
Very True.
I saw this one recently.
Makes Sense.
This should get a response from tableplay.
I don't own any ARs though, all AKs for me.
I'm really not into MEMEs but this is 3 in a row.
I got this one, after someone posted it, in response to some woman talking about how; "Whiteness is a Cult"!
lol lol lol Whiteness is a Cult.
That's a good one.
Never heard that before!
Stop confusing people with the decimal points and just say your odds are 1000 to 1 or 30,000 to 1.
The point is that I and others on here knew this shit was nothing but a Scam-Planned-Demic.
Seen right through this shit on day one and on day one I was busy snowmobiling in Utah.
Suckers!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1EPcB1HsmY
You are such an independent thinker that you even went OUTSIDE at the start of the pandemic.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
TY for posting Jimmy Dore. If there is one guy on youtube I know doesn't have anything worth saying.
Don't even click on play.
I see right through that shit.
Among the more hilarious lines of scamdemic bullshit was when they said that as long as you were sitting down and eating or drinking it was safe to take off your mask at a restaurant (or casino, etc.).Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Another humorous one was: It's ok to have a large gathering for a BLM protest, but don't gather with your family for thanksgiving because it's unsafe.
Finally we agree..Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Towards the end bil.hicks said in a moment.
Hitler had the right idea he just didn't think big enough.
You know zero about climate. Stupid fuck never goes outside.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Mick knows more about climate then you because he actually goes outside and travels. You just read bullshit to throw up here.
Man made lol
Hubris
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Literally none of this is going to happen lol
Kill yourself now before it’s to late !!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Remind me in ten years to come back here to laugh lololololololololol
What a complete loon
Social contagion at its finest
How dare you !!! “9” inch wide to the tonsils
One this is for certain.
Without any cock to ride Kewj will be jamming ice sickles into his guts.
My concern was Martial Law and rolling Tanks into Cities.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayAmong the more hilarious lines of scamdemic bullshit was when they said that as long as you were sitting down and eating or drinking it was safe to take off your mask at a restaurant (or casino, etc.).Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Another humorous one was: It's ok to have a large gathering for a BLM protest, but don't gather with your family for thanksgiving because it's unsafe.
It didn't happen but damn if it wasn't close.
They were literally saying that the unvaxxed were killing the vaccinated lol.
And they shut down Churches, Schools, Sporting Events, Restaurants, Parks, The Ocean and Beach... etc. etc.
I see no difference between Whites Only and Vaxxed Only.
And the worst part is, that they act as if, they weren't ready to jail or execute the unvaccinated.
Some countries were actually sending the unvaccinated to "camps"!
And Austria was implementing a 4000-dollar fine if you didn't take the shots!!
Scary.
Meanwhile in the People’s Republic of Berkeley, whites are starting to get banned from certain areas.
https://thenationaldesk.com/news/ame...-from-entering
Indeed. Even now, I believe to get hired at a lot of companies you must show proof of "vaccination".Quote:
Originally Posted by monetMy concern was Martial Law and rolling Tanks into Cities.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayAmong the more hilarious lines of scamdemic bullshit was when they said that as long as you were sitting down and eating or drinking it was safe to take off your mask at a restaurant (or casino, etc.).Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
Another humorous one was: It's ok to have a large gathering for a BLM protest, but don't gather with your family for thanksgiving because it's unsafe.
It didn't happen but damn if it wasn't close.
They were literally saying that the unvaxxed were killing the vaccinated lol.
And they shut down Churches, Schools, Sporting Events, Restaurants, Parks, The Ocean and Beach... etc. etc.
I see no difference between Whites Only and Vaxxed Only.
And the worst part is, that they act as if, they weren't ready to jail or execute the unvaccinated.
Some countries were actually sending the unvaccinated to "camps"!
And Austria was implementing a 4000-dollar fine if you didn't take the shots!!
Scary.
Imagine if we had to go to school in today's world.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
Is this really much different from a fraternity or a sorority?
They all set their own rules.
At least with a fraternity or sorority you can opt out of belonging to one. Opting out of school is much more problematic IMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
It's housing, not school.
Heck, if I rent a private residence I am free to allow and disallow whomever I wish from entering; these guys should have the same privilege; after all, it's their home.
I'd snap bet you I spend more time outside than either you or Mickey. You're such a buffoon. Obviously most of your stuff isn't worth responding to... just dumb shit spewed out.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueYou know zero about climate. Stupid fuck never goes outside.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Mick knows more about climate then you because he actually goes outside and travels. You just read bullshit to throw up here.
Man made lol
Hubris
I can't believe you guys are still going on about the COVID thing. You don't see me mentioning Trump once that was behind us. lol
ANyway, interesting to know that we were close to having martial law and tanks rolled out on the populace.... you learn all sorta stuff here.
What if they excluded blacks in writing instead of whites? How do you think that would turn out?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Does formally excluding different races from being allowed in certain spaces:
A) Improve race relations & decrease divisiveness?
Or
B) Hurt race relations & increase divisiveness?
Plus it’s not an individual’s own private house. It’s a “student housing complex” where students that live there are expected to abide by the rules even if they don’t agree w them.
I am not sure where the line is drawn but it is not true that landlords can freely racially discriminate. Maybe it depends on whether they advertise to the public.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
But the point was not the legality but the monumental hypocrisy. And I'm guessing the university has some kind of affiliation with it (for example keeping it on the list of off-campus housing resources).
Big Pharma now controls all major Universities anyways so what they say... Goes.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayAt least with a fraternity or sorority you can opt out of belonging to one. Opting out of school is much more problematic IMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
The amount of money that they donate annually is unreal.
Of course, the Libs will tell you that there is no conflict of interest.
Sure, but does the school own it or is it owned by a private party and made available for students?Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
If a private party owns it such an exclusion would seem more defensible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVSure, but does the school own it or is it owned by a private party and made available for students?Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
If a private party owns it such an exclusion would seem more defensible.
Whether the University owns the housing or not, looks like they are on board w the concept as they are also organizing black only graduations.
https://www.merca20.com/uc-berkeleys...sparks-debate/
Regardless, the point is do you think these type of things help race relations or hurt race relations?
The issue here isn't race relations, it's comfort and gradual assimilation of strangers in a strange land.
Hopefully college students who are graduating today don’t run into anything too “uncomfortable” in the real world as they don’t seem to be well prepared for it today.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
I do agree with you that it is a strange land indeed.
Yes. They often use universities to assist them in developing their newest drugs via research.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetBig Pharma now controls all major Universities anyways so what they say... Goes.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayAt least with a fraternity or sorority you can opt out of belonging to one. Opting out of school is much more problematic IMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
The amount of money that they donate annually is unreal.
Of course, the Libs will tell you that there is no conflict of interest.
Aka re-segregation.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Repatriations not reparations.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayAka re-segregation.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
If America is so bad and the situation of a black person is so bad in this country, we should just find a new liberia and let em take it over.
The only problem with the above argument is the lack of language skills in an African country but otherwise surely most American blacks would flock back to Africa... surely
Berkeley is majority "PoC", and even if it weren't why would for example black people need to to be shielded from white people but not from Asian or Hispanic people?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
And how is it that human beings often travel to actual foreign countries and go to school or work there without living in zones of exclusion?
The housing regulations in question are not designed for "comfort and gradual assimilation", they are designed to reflect and validate a certain theory of racial hierarchy according to which white people are oppressors and "PoC" are oppressed.
I remember some people on here saying that insurance rates would tell us the true story about covid/vax. I don't recall the exact argument at the moment but here we are with California.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...climate-crisis
I brought up something similar with FL and Mickey said it had been going on for ages. Well here we have California. Wow.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/as-oc...certain-future
I've been being lazy. Lots going on. We're fucked.
Jamaican won't rent to black americans:Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
https://youtu.be/ofulLcRRmog
Climate Change.
Ukraine.
lol
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdi2a0lC7EY
What you guys think about this little uhm smoke situation up there in NYC/DC.
The problem with all this stuff is that by the time it becomes obvious that shit is so fucked up we really have to change - we will already be deep in the shitter. This is one of those rare moments it goes beyond some city is going to run out of water.
If nothing crazy happens like nukes then it will be a gradual decline but 100% we're at the beginning of the end of the anthropocene.
This stuff is shutting a good portion of the city. Air travel. Schools. whatever. i'm wrong on all this. clearly.
Oh well a wake up call for it is too late.
Portland had invasive wildfire smoke issues a few years ago: now, surprisingly enough, it is the middle atlantic states getting hammered.
Yeah, womething is definitely amiss with this happening.
Montana gets smoked out on a regular basis. The west coast mostly gets a break from it because of prevailing winds. Most forest fires are caused by lightning. Nothing the climatards can do about it. Forest fires contribute about 3 times the amount of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere than fossil fuels do. Volcanoes also spew carbon into the air. Nothing the climatards can do about that either.
Environmentalists actually contribute to carbon in the atmosphere by not allowing deadfall to be cleared from the forest. It's the deadfall on the forest floor that is the actual fuel in forest fires. It's dry wood compared to the living wet wood in the living tree's. Forest fires are getting worse not because of climate but because of the buildup of deadfall caused by environmentalists not allowing it to be touched.
Except that forests are also huge sinks of carbon so presuming they can and do regrow they take the same carbon back out of the air.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
It is science.
And if they don't regrow it is because of the goddam climate.
Good talking point to repeat but if you pause to think about it no one is going to foot the bill to clear undergrowth from 100s of millions of acres.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe in some small forest people did it on some scale but to think that all this forest is going to have the undergrowth removed is crazy. It wasn't removed before. There was never a time when much beyond tiniest amount of undergrowth was cleared.
If I am wrong then who and when did they do ?
Don't ditz me please. I'd like you to answer the question.
Come'on man, lets be serious.
lol at you nincompoops falling for this so called "vaccine" which does nothing.
Well, not nothing, you got an 800 to 1 shot to have an adverse reaction and possible death.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj6-QDVYbv8
Look up "controlled burn" and "fire lane."Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionGood talking point to repeat but if you pause to think about it no one is going to foot the bill to clear undergrowth from 100s of millions of acres.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe in some small forest people did it on some scale but to think that all this forest is going to have the undergrowth removed is crazy. It wasn't removed before. There was never a time when much beyond tiniest amount of undergrowth was cleared.
If I am wrong then who and when did they do ?
Don't ditz me please. I'd like you to answer the question.
Come'on man, lets be serious.
Absolutely fewer controlled burns than there was, forests being managed differently. Don’t think it’s “environmentalists” preventing it so much as more homes built nearby and increased demand for use as recreation areas changed the political tolerance for it.
Should be a shit show of a hurricane season tho Atlantic is as warm now as it usually is in august/September.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcap
I will take the under on east coast hurricanes making landfall on the east cost.
Lol you are not serious. It’s done routinely in the east. When’s the last time you read about a huge Forrest fire in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York or the surrounding states?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionGood talking point to repeat but if you pause to think about it no one is going to foot the bill to clear undergrowth from 100s of millions of acres.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe in some small forest people did it on some scale but to think that all this forest is going to have the undergrowth removed is crazy. It wasn't removed before. There was never a time when much beyond tiniest amount of undergrowth was cleared.
If I am wrong then who and when did they do ?
Don't ditz me please. I'd like you to answer the question.
Come'on man, lets be serious.
Google flight big cockQuote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueLol you are not serious. It’s done routinely in the east. When’s the last time you read about a huge Forrest fire in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York or the surrounding states?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionGood talking point to repeat but if you pause to think about it no one is going to foot the bill to clear undergrowth from 100s of millions of acres.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe in some small forest people did it on some scale but to think that all this forest is going to have the undergrowth removed is crazy. It wasn't removed before. There was never a time when much beyond tiniest amount of undergrowth was cleared.
If I am wrong then who and when did they do ?
Don't ditz me please. I'd like you to answer the question.
Come'on man, lets be serious.
HQuote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueGoogle cock not allowed in California or something similar. Repeat for all the big forest fire states.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueLol you are not serious. It’s done routinely in the east. When’s the last time you read about a huge Forrest fire in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York or the surrounding states?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I don't think any of these states have anywhere near the size of forests as Canada. We know controlled burning is done all over. This is why I said "100s of millions of acres" because it was a comparison of the size and scale required to prevent the Canadian fires. (Which is what was being discussed) Not whether controlled burning exists.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueLol you are not serious. It’s done routinely in the east. When’s the last time you read about a huge Forrest fire in West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York or the surrounding states?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionGood talking point to repeat but if you pause to think about it no one is going to foot the bill to clear undergrowth from 100s of millions of acres.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe in some small forest people did it on some scale but to think that all this forest is going to have the undergrowth removed is crazy. It wasn't removed before. There was never a time when much beyond tiniest amount of undergrowth was cleared.
If I am wrong then who and when did they do ?
Don't ditz me please. I'd like you to answer the question.
Come'on man, lets be serious.
But anyway, I needed to stoke the fires a bit here.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/env...d-smashing-low
Argue with it all you want but it speaks for itself. This isn't a study. THere are no layers of possible bullshit analysis.
Antarctic and artic sea ice extent is plummeting... You can scoff at the graph but natural processes like this should have a change that is far far more subdued.
https://blog.metoffice.gov.uk/2023/0...aking-records/
If you look around enough you can find these graphs that show the outlier but it is mostly data nerds on twitter and not news orgs. Same thing with the ice extent posted above.
Capitalism promotes stuff people want to read. People don't want to read about the death of the Earth. Thus you have to dig a bit.
Maybe I'll post something how crazily temperatures are being broken globally. The rate of records being broken is sick.
Again, I am trying to avoid "studies" as they're prone to biases. Trying to keep it at empirical observations of a climate that is clearly changing due to anthropomorphic causes.
O shut the fuck up lierQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
There’s only been two state record high temperatures set in the 2000s. The last one was in 2019 in John Martin Reservoir Colorado. High temp that day was 119. Before that it was 2012 in Columbia South Carolina with a temp of 113. Literally no US records are being broken. Same goes for the rest of the world.
In fact the highest temp in the Us was recorded in 1913 at green Valley Ranch California. Temp that day was 134. Probably because of all the gas guzzling cars and cow farts in 1913 lol.
Where do you even get this from?Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueO shut the fuck up lierQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
There’s only been two state record high temperatures set in the 2000s. The last one was in 2019 in John Martin Reservoir Colorado. High temp that day was 119. Before that it was 2012 in Columbia South Carolina with a temp of 113. Literally no US records are being broken. Same goes for the rest of the world.
In fact the highest temp in the Us was recorded in 1913 at green Valley Ranch California. Temp that day was 134. Probably because of all the gas guzzling cars and cow farts in 1913 lol.
This article is from MAY 23, 2022 and I was mainly talking about this year but last year is a similar situation and disproves your nonsense.
https://phys.org/news/2022-05-temper...isruption.html
Oh I see you're likely talking about absolute highest temperature.Quote:
In Shreveport, Louisiana, on Thursday, the high of 94 F tied a 148-year-old record. That was one of more than 110 temperature records broken or tied across 21 states this week. In Texas, Galveston sweltered, setting or tying records three out of four days.
Regardless, the sea temperature is not localized and is over a relatively long period of time with this increase.
We could argue about whether daily historical highs are more important than absolute statewide records but I won't claim to know which is better.
I will tell you that the ocean temperature does not begin to be comparable to the temperatures you're referencing which were localized phenomenon over a very short time period.
Nice post, genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueO shut the fuck up lierQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
There’s only been two state record high temperatures set in the 2000s. The last one was in 2019 in John Martin Reservoir Colorado. High temp that day was 119. Before that it was 2012 in Columbia South Carolina with a temp of 113. Literally no US records are being broken. Same goes for the rest of the world.
In fact the highest temp in the Us was recorded in 1913 at green Valley Ranch California. Temp that day was 134. Probably because of all the gas guzzling cars and cow farts in 1913 lol.
https://apnews.com/article/global-re...8f1f40a6edc7a0
This ain't the first time the earth has seen increase in temperatures. At the end of the last ice age, about 10,000 years ago, sea levels had risen about 400 feet. Just think of all the coastal villages that were destroyed. The cavemen were all going "Fuck man!! These goddam forest fires, volcanic eruptions and mastodon farts are killing us!!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNice post, genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueO shut the fuck up lierQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
There’s only been two state record high temperatures set in the 2000s. The last one was in 2019 in John Martin Reservoir Colorado. High temp that day was 119. Before that it was 2012 in Columbia South Carolina with a temp of 113. Literally no US records are being broken. Same goes for the rest of the world.
In fact the highest temp in the Us was recorded in 1913 at green Valley Ranch California. Temp that day was 134. Probably because of all the gas guzzling cars and cow farts in 1913 lol.
https://apnews.com/article/global-re...8f1f40a6edc7a0
So do you think sea levels will rise 400 feet during this latest melt off?
Of course not.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
That happened at the end of an Ice Age, when a lot of the moisture now in the oceans was incorporated into glaciers and snow.
Holy shit! V had a brain movement. Each ice age. Ha.
Today, 06:24 PM #388
Gottlob1
Gottlob1 is online now
Bronze
Join Date
Jul 2023
Posts
1
Post #388 = (200 - 6)*2 ---> 26_62
Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder + Bill Yung + 1HitWonder) ---> G0TTLOB1= Praise to God
Open competition anytime. Show up money million cash we test out against each other. Since I know who you are there won’t be any funny business with you subbing in a ringer who actually has a chance. Just keep dreaming about the end of the world weirdo. It’s not happeningQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNice post, genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueO shut the fuck up lierQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
There’s only been two state record high temperatures set in the 2000s. The last one was in 2019 in John Martin Reservoir Colorado. High temp that day was 119. Before that it was 2012 in Columbia South Carolina with a temp of 113. Literally no US records are being broken. Same goes for the rest of the world.
In fact the highest temp in the Us was recorded in 1913 at green Valley Ranch California. Temp that day was 134. Probably because of all the gas guzzling cars and cow farts in 1913 lol.
https://apnews.com/article/global-re...8f1f40a6edc7a0
If you’re in a Vegas stop over to and watch me walk around the pool showing this package off
So non-industrial processes (pre-industrial processes) have the capability of heating the earth to much warmer temperatures than at present. This has happened many times over the history of the earth - but somehow non-industrial processes can be totally ruled out as being responsible for current heating processes or considered as a non-significant factor for current heating processes. Makes a lot of sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis ain't the first time the earth has seen increase in temperatures. At the end of the last ice age, about 10,000 years ago, sea levels had risen about 400 feet. Just think of all the coastal villages that were destroyed. The cavemen were all going "Fuck man!! These goddam forest fires, volcanic eruptions and mastodon farts are killing us!!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNice post, genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
https://apnews.com/article/global-re...8f1f40a6edc7a0
So do you think sea levels will rise 400 feet during this latest melt off?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis ain't the first time the earth has seen increase in temperatures. At the end of the last ice age, about 10,000 years ago, sea levels had risen about 400 feet. Just think of all the coastal villages that were destroyed. The cavemen were all going "Fuck man!! These goddam forest fires, volcanic eruptions and mastodon farts are killing us!!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionNice post, genius.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
https://apnews.com/article/global-re...8f1f40a6edc7a0
So do you think sea levels will rise 400 feet during this latest melt off?
The rate of increase is nowhere near comparable. Clearly you are educated in the subject.
You really really love applying whataboutism. Incredible.
I once tried to quantify the odds that scientists would have claimed this and it wound up being true over the course of 50 or so years... but whatever. You guys think like women. All emotions. You know what you want to believe and that's that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplaySo non-industrial processes (pre-industrial processes) have the capability of heating the earth to much warmer temperatures than at present. This has happened many times over the history of the earth - but somehow non-industrial processes can be totally ruled out as being responsible for current heating processes or considered as a non-significant factor for current heating processes. Makes a lot of sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis ain't the first time the earth has seen increase in temperatures. At the end of the last ice age, about 10,000 years ago, sea levels had risen about 400 feet. Just think of all the coastal villages that were destroyed. The cavemen were all going "Fuck man!! These goddam forest fires, volcanic eruptions and mastodon farts are killing us!!!"Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So do you think sea levels will rise 400 feet during this latest melt off?
How long do you think it took to accumulate the fossil fuels we've burned? How do you think that timeframe compares to the modern Era?
When did the earth lose its ability to heat the earth without industrial processes ? Was it yesterday afternoon ?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI once tried to quantify the odds that scientists would have claimed this and it wound up being true over the course of 50 or so years... but whatever. You guys think like women. All emotions. You know what you want to believe and that's that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplaySo non-industrial processes (pre-industrial processes) have the capability of heating the earth to much warmer temperatures than at present. This has happened many times over the history of the earth - but somehow non-industrial processes can be totally ruled out as being responsible for current heating processes or considered as a non-significant factor for current heating processes. Makes a lot of sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
How long do you think it took to accumulate the fossil fuels we've burned? How do you think that timeframe compares to the modern Era?
I sure didn't mean to suggest the Earth lost its ability to heat itself. Not sure where I did?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayWhen did the earth lose its ability to heat the earth without industrial processes ? Was it yesterday afternoon ?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI once tried to quantify the odds that scientists would have claimed this and it wound up being true over the course of 50 or so years... but whatever. You guys think like women. All emotions. You know what you want to believe and that's that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
How long do you think it took to accumulate the fossil fuels we've burned? How do you think that timeframe compares to the modern Era?
The warming is in addition to that. I have never heard one person claim that the preexisting natural processes stopped and man-made global warming made up for that and THEN SOME. Really - I have never seen anyone claim that. Are you saying people do claim that?
Fossil fuels were created over a process of millions of years. Mankind has taken a large portion of that over the past 100 years and dumped it into the atmosphere via burning. It should not be shocking that scientists believe this also is causing the rapid increase in temperature.
This prediction has existed for many years now.
If this temperature increase is not caused by man made processes then the scientists were exceptionally lucky in their outcome prediction even if you doubt the underlying reasons. It really is exceptional luck on their part.
So you're saying that that is the main cause then, rather than non-industrial processes ? You are agreeing that non-industrial processes are capable of heating earth to the extent observed and, at the same time, saying that the current heating is due to Man or not ? Rapid heating has been observed pre-industrially. So much so that the Silurian hypothesis was put forth. I think this hypothesis is far-fetched and that it is much more likely that the rapid heating in ancient times was not due to earlier advanced terrestrial civilizations but due to causes that don't require the presence of an advanced civilization.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm not following. The extraction of fossil fuels and the burning of them is an industrial process. The process that created the fossil fuels beforehand is not an industrial process. The fact that it took millions of years to create the fossil fuels in the ground which have then been extracted and burned over the course of a century (roughly) should suggest that it isn't a stretch to think it is causing the issues we are seeing.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplaySo you're saying that that is the main cause then, rather than non-industrial processes ? You are agreeing that non-industrial processes are capable of heating earth to the extent observed and, at the same time, saying that the current heating is due to Man or not ? Rapid heating has been observed pre-industrially. So much so that the Silurian hypothesis was put forth. I think this hypothesis is far-fetched and that it is much more likely that the rapid heating in ancient times was not due to earlier advanced terrestrial civilizations but due to causes that don't require the presence of an advanced civilization.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm not aware of a prior rapid warming of the Earth to the extent we're seeing currently.
Again, this has all been predicted. If they're wrong then it was one hell of a longshot they got right in the prediction of the outcome. I guess you're just saying they got the causes wrong? The odds of that being true are lol quite small.
If you want to split hairs and have a pointless semantic (?) argument then you could say that existing natural processes contribute to the heating just as much. Meaning that without the pre-existing heating, the additional (manmade) heating would NOT have had the same effect. So, yes, the heat comes from the summation of the sources of heat.
When climate people speak of warming, they are referencing warming on top of the baseline historical temperature. That is what we are talking about. Not the warming that keeps the Earth from approaching 0 degrees (or whatever the temperature is in the void of space).
Just because something is in the realm of possibility does mean it is likely. I'm not sure what non man-made process would have caused this heating outside of solar fluctuations.
It is the end of the Anthropocene, baby. And I feel fiiiiine.
The baseline historical temperature was much warmer than the current average temperature at points during pre-industrial times. That means that this pre-industrial heat was not only keeping the earth from freezing, but that it heated the earth to temperatures much higher than those observed today.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI'm not following. The extraction of fossil fuels and the burning of them is an industrial process. The process that created the fossil fuels beforehand is not an industrial process. The fact that it took millions of years to create the fossil fuels in the ground which have then been extracted and burned over the course of a century (roughly) should suggest that it isn't a stretch to think it is causing the issues we are seeing.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplaySo you're saying that that is the main cause then, rather than non-industrial processes ? You are agreeing that non-industrial processes are capable of heating earth to the extent observed and, at the same time, saying that the current heating is due to Man or not ? Rapid heating has been observed pre-industrially. So much so that the Silurian hypothesis was put forth. I think this hypothesis is far-fetched and that it is much more likely that the rapid heating in ancient times was not due to earlier advanced terrestrial civilizations but due to causes that don't require the presence of an advanced civilization.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm not aware of a rapid warming of the Earth to the extent we've seen.
Again, this has all been predicted. That was one hell of a longshot they got right.
If you want to split hairs and have a pointless semantic (?) argument then you could say that existing natural processes contribute to the heating just as much. Meaning that without the pre-existing heating, the additional (manmade) heating would NOT have had the same effect. So, yes, the heat comes from the summation of the sources of heat.
When climate people speak of warming, they are referencing warming on top of the baseline historical temperature. That is what we are talking about. Not the warming that keeps the Earth from approaching 0 degrees (or whatever the temperature is in the void of space).
Just because something is in the realm of possibility does mean it is likely. I'm not sure what non man-made process would have caused this heating outside of solar fluctuations.
It is the end of the Anthropocene, baby. And I feel fiiiiine.
By baseline historical temperature I meant in the past few hundred years or what have you. Yes the world goes back 100s of millions of years and things happened that are semi-equivalent with what is happening now.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe baseline historical temperature was much warmer than the current average temperature at points during pre-industrial times. That means that this pre-industrial heat was not only keeping the earth from freezing, but that it heated the earth to temperatures much higher than those observed today.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI'm not following. The extraction of fossil fuels and the burning of them is an industrial process. The process that created the fossil fuels beforehand is not an industrial process. The fact that it took millions of years to create the fossil fuels in the ground which have then been extracted and burned over the course of a century (roughly) should suggest that it isn't a stretch to think it is causing the issues we are seeing.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I'm not aware of a rapid warming of the Earth to the extent we've seen.
Again, this has all been predicted. That was one hell of a longshot they got right.
If you want to split hairs and have a pointless semantic (?) argument then you could say that existing natural processes contribute to the heating just as much. Meaning that without the pre-existing heating, the additional (manmade) heating would NOT have had the same effect. So, yes, the heat comes from the summation of the sources of heat.
When climate people speak of warming, they are referencing warming on top of the baseline historical temperature. That is what we are talking about. Not the warming that keeps the Earth from approaching 0 degrees (or whatever the temperature is in the void of space).
Just because something is in the realm of possibility does mean it is likely. I'm not sure what non man-made process would have caused this heating outside of solar fluctuations.
It is the end of the Anthropocene, baby. And I feel fiiiiine.
I try to be as precise as possible but I still miss a few. It is a constant battle of being to wordy vs not covering your ass against useless pedantic arguments.
Anyway, this is just more whataboutism or what I named the universal excuse.
I don't believe scientists have the ability to measure the "rapid increase" in the Earths temperature going back that far. All those methods aren't going to give accuracy down to a couple hundred years when looking back 10s of millions or what have you. Perhaps.
Tableplay It’s best not to engage with this cuck AIQ in any meaningful way. The tactic is to speak to him on a level he understands. Like how his cock is small and his sexual stamina low. All doomers have a mental disorder. So treat them as so, and try to get him to bet on something. Like the less he thinks of you the greater possibility he over estimates his intelligence. Prime him up. I’ve tried but deep down he knows he’s a failure.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionBy baseline historical temperature I meant in the past few hundred years or what have you. Yes the world goes back 100s of millions of years and things happened that are semi-equivalent with what is happening now.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe baseline historical temperature was much warmer than the current average temperature at points during pre-industrial times. That means that this pre-industrial heat was not only keeping the earth from freezing, but that it heated the earth to temperatures much higher than those observed today.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I try to be as precise as possible but I still miss a few. It is a constant battle of being to wordy vs not covering your ass against useless pedantic arguments.
Anyway, this is just more whataboutism or what I named the universal excuse.
I don't believe scientists have the ability to measure the "rapid increase" in the Earths temperature going back that far. All those methods aren't going to give accuracy down to a couple hundred years when looking back 10s of millions or what have you. Perhaps.
Still waiting for these state record temperatures to fall. I mean everyday we should see a new high temperature state record broken. During El Niño these guys have plenty to talk about. Yawn
You get fucked like a womenQuote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI once tried to quantify the odds that scientists would have claimed this and it wound up being true over the course of 50 or so years... but whatever. You guys think like women. All emotions. You know what you want to believe and that's that.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplaySo non-industrial processes (pre-industrial processes) have the capability of heating the earth to much warmer temperatures than at present. This has happened many times over the history of the earth - but somehow non-industrial processes can be totally ruled out as being responsible for current heating processes or considered as a non-significant factor for current heating processes. Makes a lot of sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
How long do you think it took to accumulate the fossil fuels we've burned? How do you think that timeframe compares to the modern Era?