Lack of a fundamental understanding of what makes a person credible has always been kewl's biggest challenge. He believes if a statement does not violate known AP principles and cannot be dis-proven, then it should be believed and somehow he is credible. He does not take into consideration the totality of his admitted lies, unlikely claims and contradictions as a whole.
If he gets caught in a contradiction then he had to lie to protect himself. Rinse. Repeat... but credibility is gone.