Here you go AxelWolf

[redietz]

Not to challenge your legal expertise, MrV, but could you point to the post where I said, "no court would allow him (meaning KewlJ(s)) to say that during a trial." My neurons have aged considerably, and sometimes I get confused as to what I actually wrote. So please humor me. I appreciate it.

Please do feel free to challenge or question my comments.

I was responding to your characterizing KJ's statements as being "basically all hearsay."

So far as me claiming that you said "no court would allow him (meaning KewlJ(s)) to say that during a trial: I never said that you made that specific claim.

I guess I confused you by using quotation marks for emphasis as opposed to attribution: mea culpa.

Were his comments "hearsay" then the court would sustain a hearsay objection and disallow the testimony: that is the crux of my response.

So, and correct me if I'm wrong, you put in quotes something I never actually wrote. That's an old Singer strategy.

Emphasis as opposed to attribution? LOL. As they say on ESPN, "C'mon, man!" That trick will get you a big, fat F in any journalism class.

What a sleazeball.

That "emphasis as opposed to attribution" nonsense wouldn't fly in a court of libel, V. Now, would it?

Man, that was weak, poor, and slimy. I think this whole objective act of yours is full of holes. You just quoted me as saying something I did not say. What makes you think that's okay? That's more of a bald-faced lie than anything MDawg's spouted lo these many moons.