Originally Posted by
AxelWolf
I didn't care at all before who Andrew was. But now I do, I don't like being lied to for no reason, especially when I'm trying to do someone a favor. I apologize to Alan and wanted to bury the hatchet. Alan told me he was not Andrew, I don't even think I asked, he's the one that came out saying that he wasn't him. He didn't have to lie, he could have just not said anything about it. I sure hope Alan is telling the truth someone's just trying to make it look he is Alan.
------------------------------------------
I asked Alan on the other Forum how he could possibly believe and Rob's video poker system when there's very few people that actually believe is any Merit to it actually working. Even if somehow Rob actually did make money due to some fluke side of variance, it's still not a valid system that can turn a profit for anyone else unless they just also happen to be on some fluke side of variance. His system should not be touted in any way shape or form by anyone, it should only be debunked as a long-term losing system and entertainment only.
Rob said earlier about how Alan was using Singer for the benefit of his website. I believe that to be true. There's nothing wrong with trying to get some traffic to your website so you can make some money. However, don't think touting a bunk system it's too ethical. It will always leave me wondering if even Alan new deep down inside knew the system probably didn't work. I just can't fathom how anybody with any gambling experience can believe in such things. As a reporter you think one would be a little more stringent on what they would promote and require proof before promoting it.
Axel, please stop being misled by others. Like it or not, I had a valid reason for purposely misleading readers during my DU years. No one, even you, has come up with a better plan overall, had it been you. And if you don't know that Andrew = Alan then I'll pay for your education if you want to go to UNLV once the next semester begins.
There's plenty of people who understand that you don't absolutely require a 100% mathematically sound strategy to consistently win at vp. Like kew, you may not understand or want to understand it, but that's why humans were gifted with an enormously powerful computer system attached to their necks. And yes, some are better or MUCH more capable than others. You know which one I have.