The Verdict Is?

[MDawg]

It is inconceivable that someone who spends day and night on some Superman quest for truth 10X Multiplier sometimes tens of thousands of words a day about why so and so should not be believed but he should be believed would not try to prove himself on something like this. Unless there is no proof to provide.

And not one of his "deflections" as AccountInQuestion correctly puts it, makes any sense as to why he couldn't provide at least the case # to someone he trusts.

In any case, just give it some time and if none of those many APs who he says already know all about this and the press who he says have already contacted him don't reveal something about the first backrooming Las Vegas case in many years where someone suffered a broken arm doesn't get out there, we'll know why.

As MrV has said...

tick...tick...tick....

[accountinquestion]

I am not seeing how telling Druff the court case which you purport to exist would break your NDA.

Dude, it isn't that I don't trust Dan Druff. I do. First Druff hasn't even asked me anything about this case. He did mention he had some concerns early on, but has not said "boo" since. I kind of figure it is because he is well connected has heard or knows people that know all about it. But I could be wrong. I kind of figured that about MaxPen too, so his comments last night surprised me.

I am sure you people could lobby Druff to say something and play the part you want, but there is just no reason for me to say anything more to anyone. Honestly, I provided that opportunity for weeks and weeks, several times saying that I probably shouldn't discuss anything further, but I was willing to do so, if any legitimate members had questions I would try to answer as best I could. No many people said a word. Now all of the sudden that window has closed and people want me to talk. And the trolls in particular want me to lead them right to the very information they want to use to dox and harm me. Have we crossed over into some sort of Jerry Seinfeld "Bizzaro" world?

The reason you would tell Druff is he is a publicly known person who has a reputation on the line. Outside of that he has a history far longer than yours on these forums without any occurance of him violating trust. I'm sure he has escrowed amounts many times over these years. Spotless. I could fault the guy but not in this regard. Impeccable.

"I'm sure you people could lobby Druff to say something and play the part"? WTF does that even mean? He just confirms the court case exists. What would we lobby him to say? The court case doesn't exist? lolz.

No one is asking you to lead them "right to the very information they want to use to dox and harm me". Lol. Spin deflect and deflect some more.

Anyway, this has been interesting and amusing BUT ... you have wasted enough time of people.

<bangs gavel>

Court is adjourned. Kewl has been found guilty of another whopper.

[kewlJ]

KJ, I am probably your biggest "fan" on this board and yes, I still very much want to believe in you and what you say, as to date I've found you to be credible.

Yes, I am a retired attorney, and although I am an admitted pot-stirrer as well as a pot smoker, I can keep a secret.

With that in mind, perhaps you'll consider PMing me some corroboration about the incident, e.g. a court case number that I could check up on and verify; once corroborated I would be happy to post to the effect that I am satisfied with the corroboration and that I believe you: I would not mention any other specifics, i.e. the case number would not be posted.

I guess it boils down to two questions: Do you trust me? And are you desirous of shutting up your detractors on this matter?

Please think about it.

MrV. I do trust you. Just like I trust Dan Druff. The case is over. I have been paid. There is no reason for me to say anything to anyone at this point and if I do, it could be problematic for me, legally and financially. What if at some point you or Druff or anyone else I confided in says, KJ told me the name of the casino and I have verified that it was xxx casino. THAT could cost me a lot of money if I was hauled into court, even just defending myself. There simply is no reason for me to say anything specific about this case to ANYONE, that could even hint at me violating the agreement. And that is non paid for advice of my attorney.

I still think some stuff may come out and you may end up with the information or confirmation you are looking for, but it won't come from me in any shape or form.

Oh and MrV, nothing said or that comes out at some point is going to shut up my detractors. Come on man....what world are you living in?

[kewlJ]

KewlJ you're so busted.

<bangs gavel>

Court is adjourned. Kewl has been found guilty of another whopper.

I am absolutely fine with you guys having these opinions. Doesn't change a thing for me. I live where I live. I do what I do for a living (and actually had a very good first half of 2023, playing much less than usual. Don't know what second half will bring....but I never do), I have the money from this settlement, which I don't could towards winnings. So some people on an internet forum don't like and/or don't believe me. So what? Wouldn't matter if every person on the internet forum doesn't like or believe me. Changes nothing for me in the real world. I never have benefitted one cent by people believing anything I have shared.

Anyway, heading out for a while.

[smurgerburger]

When I think of people who don't care what other people are saying about them on the Internet... I think of kewlJ.

[MisterV]

KJ, all you need do is send me the case number.

I verify, then post as follows: "I have viewed objective corroboration of his claim and I am satisfied it happened."

I question how that could be used against you?

But if you won't do it, you won't do it, let's move on.

[MDawg]

When I think of people who don't care what other people are saying about them on the Internet... I think of kewlJ.

[MaxPen]

All the personal injury cases in Clark County run thru the Eighth District Court. There is a link you can subscribe to view everything that touches that court. There are about 40-60 new cases per day. They are not all personal injury. Instead of searching this will be easy but probably take about 8 hours to positively confirm. I will acknowledge my results within the week. I have some downtime that I won't have much to do other than hanging out out of town.

[MisterV]

Thanks MP, looking forward to your findings.

[jbjb]

Mdawg and Singer are basically just entertaining.

Watching grass grow is more "entertaining".

[Rob.Singer]

Mdawg and Singer are basically just entertaining.

Watching grass grow is more "entertaining".

Careful....MrV may take that literally.

This entire tale has turned into stupid. It was blatantly obvious from the get-go from the way the dumbest poster and poorest liar on the internet presented it, that it would all come down to this. Kew has painted himself into the proverbial corner on this one, and you can see in his desperate and wordy responses that he knows how thin the ice is.

When a guy like MrV offers continued anonymity as well as notice of corroboration in return for some kind of confirmation--and kew (who seriously depends on continuing his concocted existence thru his gambling forum peers) REJECTS it for no reason whatsoever? Very very telling.

Kew also makes believe max will stumble across his case in his search, so he facetiously asks him not to disclose anything Max may not believe those of us who've already checked with other local attorneys, law enforcement, and the news media, but there's ZERO chance he'll do anything other than what they have and we have: draw nothing but blanks. And remember, kew claims local news people have been on this for over a week, not to mention all his "trusted AP friends" that he "told".

Kew, your goose has been greased, cooked, carved, eaten and shit out. Fess up you idiot.

[smurgerburger]

In case anyone is researching this, after reading Max's comment I googled a bit and it seems the link I gave was for the "justice court" which I guess is small claims court (it handles claims not exceeding $15k and some other matters).

As Max said it looks like the district court (the 8th) is where this would have gone.

[Rob.Singer]

In case anyone is researching this, after reading Max's comment I googled a bit and it seems the link I gave was for the "justice court" which I guess is small claims court (it handles claims not exceeding $15k and some other matters).

As Max said it looks like the district court (the 8th) is where this would have gone.

Look for kew to go there too. Isn't that where one offers cash pymts. to "friends" in return for false testimony??

[MaxPen]

If I had to place a bet right now as this having occurred I would need at minimum +2000.

http://https://unicourt.com/courthou...it_S=chup_prev

I spent the last few hours on unicourt.com. All cases in the 8th District Court are listed by day. I sifted thru thousands of cases from 4/16/23 which is one day before Kj started his thread. I took it all the way to 05/29/23 which is one week past KJ stated that the case was underway.

The nice thing about that site is every single case that goes thru that court is there. It is alo broken up into types of cases. Personal injury, Labor, Contract, Property, and Other. I looked at every single personal injury. If it was not person vs person which are mostly traffic accidents I reviewed it further. Any case that was man or woman vs any business entity I looked further. I found many more cases against casinos than if you simply did a search. There are a select few dozen that I plan on reading the case summary. You have to download those. So that's the next step.

Many involving casinos appear to involve elevators. I find that weird because I have never been stuck in an elevator. I ran into just about every casino being involved in one case or another from Primm to Aliante on out to Boulder City. One thing for certain is Bob Nersesian is not the attorney in any case filed during that time frame. Which is why I would not think I am going to find anything to verify this claim.

This is looking like KewlJ's Newell moment. I find the whole thing bizarre. I'm kind of glad it happened though. A person can learn a lot thru case review, I think.

[MaxPen]

In case anyone is researching this, after reading Max's comment I googled a bit and it seems the link I gave was for the "justice court" which I guess is small claims court (it handles claims not exceeding $15k and some other matters).

As Max said it looks like the district court (the 8th) is where this would have gone.

Look for kew to go there too. Isn't that where one offers cash pymts. to "friends" in return for false testimony??

Not sure where you're going with this. But I am on your side on this one. It's not as quick to debunk this whopper as you're Newell. I'm 5 or so hours in on this project. The Newell at the dealership took less than 15 minutes to find....lol

[kewlJ]

. Fess up you idiot.

Perhaps you are right Ron. The time has come. I was hoping to drag this out a little further and have you 2 idiots (Singer & Mdawg) chasing and looking for something that they couldn't possibly find. I really enjoyed that. I didn't anticipate MaxPen getting involved as I wouldn't have wanted to waste his time.

This case is sealed, at BOTH parties request. That means it is NOT public information, unless an interested party can prove to the court they have a legitimate interest in the case.

I said at the very beginning that I would not allow Singer and Mdawg to use information from this case to harm me. It was Mdawg I was most concerned with. I was almost willing to not pursue anything, but changed my mind when the attorney said he thought we had ample reason for requesting the case be sealed. No guarantees on that front, but the guy knows what he is doing and it worked out. Turns out BOTH sides wanted the case sealed for very different reasons. THAT was something we agree on before any other terms were agreed to. I don't think I can give any more details than that. Nor do I expect some will believe this.

MaxPen, I am not sure why you got involved. If you just wanted to confirm for your own curiosity, you KNOW people that know all about this case and the attorney involved. I could have even put you in touch with someone that would have satisfied your curiosity. But now I don't know what to think about you.

But thanks for screwing up a good trolling effort to have these guys on a scavenger hunt that they couldn't succeed at. I could have watched these two going on and on about "no case to be found" for months...or probably years.

And yes, there still may be info released at some point against my wishes. There was a news reporter sniffing around a couple weeks ago that contacted me. I have no idea what kind of sources these people might have to get around the system, but just the fact that she contacted me, means she got somewhere (some information). I mean it isn't that big a story so hopefully she hits or has hit a dead end and it dies there.

[smurgerburger]

Here's NRS on the requirements for sealing a case: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/SCR_RGSRCR.html

Based on the plain text it doesn't sound like they would seal an entire case (as opposed to the settlement terms) without substantial reason, but I don't know how the NV courts handle it in practice.

[MaxPen]

. Fess up you idiot.

Perhaps you are right Ron. The time has come. I was hoping to drag this out a little further and have you 2 idiots (Singer & Mdawg) chasing and looking for something that they couldn't possibly find. I really enjoyed that. I didn't anticipate MaxPen getting involved as I wouldn't have wanted to waste his time.

This case is sealed, at BOTH parties request. That means it is NOT public information, unless an interested party can prove to the court they have a legitimate interest in the case.

I said at the very beginning that I would not allow Singer and Mdawg to use information from this case to harm me. It was Mdawg I was most concerned with. I was almost willing to not pursue anything, but changed my mind when the attorney said he thought we had ample reason for requesting the case be sealed. No guarantees on that front, but the guy knows what he is doing and it worked out. Turns out BOTH sides wanted the case sealed for very different reasons. THAT was something we agree on before any other terms were agreed to. I don't think I can give any more details than that. Nor do I expect some will believe this.

MaxPen, I am not sure why you got involved. If you just wanted to confirm for your own curiosity, you KNOW people that know all about this case and the attorney involved. I could have even put you in touch with someone that would have satisfied your curiosity. But now I don't know what to think about you.

But thanks for screwing up a good trolling effort to have these guys on a scavenger hunt that they couldn't succeed at. I could have watched these two going on and on about "no case to be found" for months...or probably years.

And yes, there still may be info released at some point against my wishes. There was a news reporter sniffing around a couple weeks ago that contacted me. I have no idea what kind of sources these people might have to get around the system, but just the fact that she contacted me, means she got somewhere (some information). I mean it isn't that big a story so hopefully she hits or has hit a dead end and it dies there.

I will let the real attorneys on the forum chime in on the sealing of records in a personal injury case in the State of Nevada.

I haven't talked to anyone about this. Guess I'm going to have to ask around as well.

You literally could stop all this by having DanDruff verify.

I got involved because the evidence kept mounting that this was a phony claim. If it is fake then you trolled MrV as hard as anyone.

[jbjb]

Docket information should be public record.

[kewlJ]

without substantial reason, but I don't know how the NV courts handle it in practice.

We had a substantial reason. And the court agreed.

But MDawg will be along shortly to claim this can't be.

I told the forum very early on I was 2 steps ahead if these guys and would never allow them to get information from this case that could harm me.