The Verdict Is?

[kewlJ]

It is not that important, but you guys that refer to this as a personal injury case are barking up the wrong tree. This was a civil case alleging casino abuse and illegal detention. A relatively minor fractured arm occurred but that was not the basis of this case. I am not an attorney, so I don't know what a fractured arm (not even a compound fracture), that healed in 7 weeks would be worth, but it would not be the amount I received. In a personal injury case, the person injured would go to multiple doctors arranged by their own attorney, and claim they are in excruciating pain and this and that. I did none of that.

So that is just not what this case was. This case was about being illegally detained/arrested.

[jbjb]

It is not that important, but you guys that refer to this as a personal injury case are barking up the wrong tree. This was a civil case alleging casino abuse and illegal detention. A relatively minor fractured arm occurred but that was not the basis of this case. I am not an attorney, so I don't know what a fractured arm (not even a compound fracture), that healed in 7 weeks would be worth, but it would not be the amount I received. In a personal injury case, the person injured would go to multiple doctors arranged by their own attorney, and claim they are in excruciating pain and this and that. I did none of that.

So that is just not what this case was. This case was about being illegally detained/arrested.

A broken bone would be cause for automatic arrest of the assailant.

Just admit it....you got caught.

[MaxPen]

It is not that important, but you guys that refer to this as a personal injury case are barking up the wrong tree. This was a civil case alleging casino abuse and illegal detention. A relatively minor fractured arm occurred but that was not the basis of this case. I am not an attorney, so I don't know what a fractured arm (not even a compound fracture), that healed in 7 weeks would be worth, but it would not be the amount I received. In a personal injury case, the person injured would go to multiple doctors arranged by their own attorney, and claim they are in excruciating pain and this and that. I did none of that.

So that is just not what this case was. This case was about being illegally detained/arrested.

It would still travel thru that court in Clark County. I also looked at the cases in the other section. Most of them are name changes, debt stuff, and what not.

Just sit back and relax we will render judgement soon enough..lol

You're flailing around like Singer is famous for.

[Rob.Singer]

So funny....now the case is SEALED.... And if someone proves such civil cases can still be identified in X or Y manner, suddenly it will have been filed outside of Clark County.

Prepare the goose.....

[MisterV]

Here's NRS on the requirements for sealing a case: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/SCR_RGSRCR.html Based on the plain text it doesn't sound like they would seal an entire case (as opposed to the settlement terms) without substantial reason, but I don't know how the NV courts handle it in practice.

Nor do I as I practiced elsewhere, but I reviewed the Nevada statute and will give my opinion.

In pertinent part it states: "The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed or redacted, provided the court makes and enters written findings that the specific sealing or redaction is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in access to the court record. The parties’ agreement alone does not constitute a sufficient basis for the court to seal or redact court records."

KJ would have a high burdern of proof in convincing a judge to seal the entire case, as there is a strong public interest in protecting the public from improper casino actions.

I question whether KJ / his attorney could articulate sufficient reason, i.e. the "compelling privacy or safety interests."

I say this because IF it happened as claimed, the alleged defendant casino now / already knows KJ's name, they have his photo, and they know he's a card counter.

Presumably they've notified other casinos via reporting to OSN (why wouldn't they?) so what is the risk to his privacy?

He's exposed; what further harm could a doxxer do?

Certainly there are no true "safety" factors at play here, either.

To conclude: I suspect (but cannot state with certainty) that no lawsuit was filed and then entirely sealed due to his likely inability to meet the required burden of proof viz. showing a compelling privacy or safety interest.

But then, this allegedly happened in Clark County, and for all I know the judge could be a crony of KJ's attorney and maybe he sealed it due to friendship?

But I doubt the old boy network was at work here.

[Rob.Singer]

It is not that important, but you guys that refer to this as a personal injury case are barking up the wrong tree. This was a civil case alleging casino abuse and illegal detention. A relatively minor fractured arm occurred but that was not the basis of this case. I am not an attorney, so I don't know what a fractured arm (not even a compound fracture), that healed in 7 weeks would be worth, but it would not be the amount I received. In a personal injury case, the person injured would go to multiple doctors arranged by their own attorney, and claim they are in excruciating pain and this and that. I did none of that.

So that is just not what this case was. This case was about being illegally detained/arrested.

It would still travel thru that court in Clark County. I also looked at the cases in the other section. Most of them are name changes, debt stuff, and what not.

Just sit back and relax we will render judgement soon enough..lol

You're flailing around like Singer is famous for.

Not sure how often you read here but I admitted those interior pics were not from our Newell quite a while ago--and why. It was a dumb thing to do. The rest of everything I've said however, is true. Most won't and don't believe this or that or this and that, which doesn't mean squat since my family are reaping the benefits either way. But with kew's crazy claim, he just cannot STAND others posting doubt, disbelief, and seeing him as being dishonest about any of it. He lives his life right here and not out there.

Pray for him. You too jbjb.

[jbjb]

I pray for no-one. It's a worthless endeavor.

[kewlJ]

I love how Rob says "I can't stand people doubting and disbelieving me". That is all I have dealt with since day 1 here starting with the late Alan Mendelson, who admitted he played little or no blackjack but still tried with all his might to prove me wrong about a multitude of things.

I even go over to that other forum you hang out on Rob, where everyone doubts me or at least claims too. If people doubting me bothered me, I would never post there. Not only does it not bother me, but I enjoy fucking with you trolls.

Maxpen: no need for your 'suspense'. You aren't going to find what you are looking for. Not without petitioning the court.

So just have at it and post what you want to post. Have at it, dude.

[kewlJ]

A broken bone would be cause for automatic arrest of the assailant.

Wrong jbjb. Maybe with an assault case, or a bar fight, or domestic violence case.

Even with the aid of video, there would be nothing to suggest this was anything criminal. They are responsible yes, but not criminally so.

That is why I didnt go after the guy, other than wanting him terminated, which happened before I even asked for it.

[accountinquestion]

without substantial reason, but I don't know how the NV courts handle it in practice.

We had a substantial reason. And the court agreed.

But MDawg will be along shortly to claim this can't be.

I told the forum very early on I was 2 steps ahead if these guys and would never allow them to get information from this case that could harm me.

2 steps ahead yet you wouldn't even have sued until everyone on here told you how great of a case it would be. lol.

Well I was 3 steps ahead of them and 1 step ahead of you. I called bullshit on your goofy-assed lie from the beginning. So there! Hows THAT !?

Even with the aid of video, there would be nothing to suggest this was anything criminal. They are responsible yes, but not criminally so.

Dude pushes Kewl so hard he falls back and breaks his arm. Sounds like assault to me. Do we now have to look at the statute for assault !?

Ok - it is battery and not assault. A misdemeanor. Whether worthy of arrest I can't say but clearly criminal.

[Rob.Singer]

Kew, you're busted and embarrassed. Be a good girly-man and admit it. All the diverting, deflecting, lying, and posturing in the world won't save you.

I find it interesting that 7 people actually voted for you. It HAS to be they voted that way due to their hatred of mdawg and myself. That....or they're the stupidest fools to ever come down the forum pike.

[kewlJ]

So there! Hows THAT !?

How is that? It is absolutely fine mate. You are wrong, but so what. That has happened many times.

[Rob.Singer]

A broken bone would be cause for automatic arrest of the assailant.

Wrong jbjb. Maybe with an assault case, or a bar fight, or domestic violence case.

Even with the aid of video, there would be nothing to suggest this was anything criminal. They are responsible yes, but not criminally so.

That is why I didnt go after the guy, other than wanting him terminated, which happened before I even asked for it.

Do you know how stupid you look after saying yet another lie?

It's clear you did not study up on either civil OR criminal law before starting this fiasco. Again, all you're doing is what you always do: claim you know something, and if anyone knows you're lying and says so, you claim they're wrong.

If you had any market value before, the recommendation is SELL IMMEDIATELY!

[Rob.Singer]

So there! Hows THAT !?

How is that? It is absolutely fine mate. You are wrong, but so what. That has happened many times.

How many people does that make that are "wrong" about you now--14?

[accountinquestion]

Kew, you're busted and embarrassed. Be a good girly-man and admit it. All the diverting, deflecting, lying, and posturing in the world won't save you.

I find it interesting that 7 people actually voted for you. It HAS to be they voted that way due to their hatred of mdawg and myself. That....or they're the stupidest fools to ever come down the forum pike.

It is all of Bill Yung's accounts and 2 sock puppets of Kewls.

[MDawg]

You should take the mere fact that this compulsive liar (two descriptive words, C.L., as stated by one of the APs UNKewlJ claimed supported him) has suggested that a civil case like this one could be sealed as the nail in the coffin that establishes conclusively that nothing this clown has to say, is true.

It's just a false imprisonment, battery lawsuit, nothing there to justify sealing it.

And in any case, the lawsuit hasn't been of record at any point. Because it doesn't exist.

And...
for the first time perhaps...
I agree with jbjb

Docket information should be public record.

Nevada rule will limit sealing of civil cases

the rules require that a public docket of all cases must be maintained, and the findings justifying sealing must be made in writing and should be available even if the rest of the case is sealed
In other words, UNKewlJ caught in yet another absurdist lie by saying that

This case is sealed, That means it is NOT public information

and another lie grounded in a misrepresentation and ignorance of the law (like his confusion with plaintiff and defendant even after supposedly signing a settlement agreement where he would have been referred to as plaintiff over and over)

This case is sealed, at BOTH parties request.

the rule specifies that agreement between the parties is in itself not enough to justify sealing, and that redacting specific information in a document should be made rather than completely sealing the document.
which of course directly contradicts another couple of lies UNKewlJ pulled out of his battered ass, that there would remain no public record and that somehow the request of "BOTH" parties was enough to get it sealed.

Could those who voted in favor, come on record now and say what they think and why? Because if they don't realize by now that they were wrong to vote in favor, they don't belong in the same room with anyone who has any common sense.

I mean fuck, at three or four in the morning, after beating the casino at yet another session, having a late dinner and great sex, I'm still sharper and able to come up with something more coherent than this feeble minded twit.

I mean I was just lying in bed watching a lil HBO Max when I decided to take a peek at this thread. Wow, what a ridiculous and obvious whopper this has become.

Please do take up AccountinQuestion on his kind offer. For a mere $200, next time, you could avoid making such a potty sullied panties fool of yourself.

Next time you want to tell a whopper, talk to me and lets walk through it. I'll only charge you $200.

Can anyone believe anything this C.L. has to say, about anything, now?


https://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/SCR_RGSRCR.html

Rule 3
4(c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited.  Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation “case sealed”; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal.

(The above information alone...is really all any of us would need to prove or disprove that the lawsuit exists...case number...date that the action was commenced...names of the parties...case type and causes of action. Not to mention the order to seal and findings. All of these together would be more than enough to establish that this lawsuit is the one UNKewlJ was involved in. )

Plus...if you really want to go through it step by step, there's no conceivable reason to seal something like this lawsuit UNKewlJ made up:

Rule 3
4.  Grounds to seal or redact; written findings required.  The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed or redacted, provided the court makes and enters written findings that the specific sealing or redaction is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in access to the court record. The parties’ agreement alone does not constitute a sufficient basis for the court to seal or redact court records. The public interest in privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in open court records include findings that:

(a) The sealing or redaction is permitted or required by federal or state law;

(b) The sealing or redaction furthers an order entered under NRCP 12(f) or JCRCP 12(f) or a protective order entered under NRCP 26(c) or JCRCP 26(c);

(c) The sealing or redaction furthers an order entered in accordance with federal or state laws that serve to protect the public health and safety;

(d) The redaction includes only restricted personal information contained in the court record;

(e) The sealing or redaction is of the confidential terms of a settlement agreement of the parties;

(f) The sealing or redaction includes medical, mental health, or tax records;

(g) The sealing or redaction is necessary to protect intellectual proprietary or property interests such as trade secrets as defined in NRS 600A.030(5); or

(h) The sealing or redaction is justified or required by another identified compelling circumstance.

Keep in mind too that
Rule 3
5(b) Redaction preferred.  A court record shall not be sealed under these rules when reasonable redaction will adequately resolve the issues before the court under subsection 4 above.
meaning that only under extraordinary circumstances is a case sealed at all, in most cases it merely has bits of it redacted...and in no case does the full docket go away. And the docket was all any of us was searching for in the first place.

[MDawg]

This is all pretty much like a fucking 1970s Columbo episode. If UNKewlJ had just kept his wide, loose, shabby mouth shut, like a horse,



he wouldn't have hanged himself.



The more bullshit he spouted, the more clear it became that he was lying.



Over all, the problem is that this fucking idiot thinks that everyone is as stupid as he is.

[Rob.Singer]

Play It Again Sam

Exposed (again), Unprepared (again), Yappy Yappy Mouth (again), Lie & Lie Some More (again)....and ALL because he was getting nervous over not receiving the attention, relevance, and acceptance he twistedly thought his now-confirmed completely concocted virtual internet forum life, somehow deserves.

Case rested..,.but NOT "sealed" FOREVER!!

[kewlJ]

(h) The sealing or redaction is justified or required by another identified compelling circumstance.

You provided the answer to your own accusation.

[kewlJ]

Could those who voted in favor, come on record now and say what they think and why? Because if they don't realize by now that they were wrong to vote in favor, they don't belong in the same room with anyone who has any common sense.

Why is it so important to you to try to influence how people voted in a stupid internet forum poll? There are people that know things about this case that you do not know. And it has been that way since the very beginning.

having a late dinner and great sex,

Another hooker? Let's hope you didn't 'lose" a watch this time.