MDawg system wins him $400K in one bacc session - watch for patterns - press into them

[Half Smoke]

.
since MDawg mentioned the Wizard and his demonstration to the Wizard and implied that the Wizard endorsed him as a winning player it seems appropriate to quote exactly what the Wizard has said about him which I have linked -you will find it 8 posts up from the bottom of the linked page


quote from Mike Shackleford aka the Wizard of Odds:


"Mdawg's confession about his baccarat play over the entirety of his trip I found to be very honest and commendable.

At this point, let me make a disclaimer that not only do I think betting systems can't beat the house edge in baccarat, they can't even dent it. This includes whatever Mdawg is doing, without knowing much about it. So, I am not endorsing anything he says. In fact, if he is implying a way to beat baccarat straight up, I would strongly disagree."


end of quote from Mike


so what was the confession__________?__________to the best of my knowledge it was that he and the Wizard went over his records and found him to be about even over the course of some trip



https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...-of-mdawg/125/

[MHF]

Who the heck can care about the gambling forays? They're already nothing more than claims that can't/won't be conclusively substantiated.

[MisterV]

The proof is in the pudding that when witnessed I played and won exactly the way I have claimed all along. I won and pressed into every hand in the only run on that entire shoe when I won the DarkOz Challenge wager as witnessed and verified by the Wizard. How’d MDawg do dat?

Yes, it happened...good for you.

That little exercise in hubris proved NOTHING however other than the fact that you like many gamblers seem to confuse variance for skill; in other words: "Luck happens."

The sampling was far too short in duration to be statistically significant: try again, but this time do it right.

[MDawg]

I do do it. Alll the time pal.

Not just win…but get people with no life like UNKewlJ, Terapined and HalfSmoke up in arms softly whining about how it can’t bayyyyyyy. Think about it though? Who are these three? A male prostitute, a guy living in an old tiny trailer and yet another washy type who keeps vowing to quit this or that forum just like UNKewlJ.

AccountInQuestion would say Get Help, I’d say Get a Life.

https://www.101soundboards.com/sound...feeding-off-me

[Half Smoke]

.
but it's not just us 3 - remember - it's your good buddy the Wizard who posted -



So, I am not endorsing anything he says.

.


https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gamb...-of-mdawg/125/

.


.

[MDawg]

Incorrect.

I shared privately with the Wizard additional checks issued to me by the casinos, dating from the very end of May 2021, to end of June 2021, totaling approximately $250K (where all but approx. 100K was memo marked as "verified win" or "verified chips" - the remaining 100K had no memo on the check(s) at all), and these are besides the ones I shared with the Wizard before for the period March to May 2021.

The Wizard stated that he had no objection to my posting the above since it is true. Stated that he will not be verifying images at the forum any longer though.

The prior winning checks, that the Wizard did post verifications about at the forum in this thread, totaled some $260K, so that's a half million in winning checks issued to me for verified wins in the past few months, notwithstanding cashed chips and those converted to straight cash.


I am not sure if you are aware of this or not, but casinos will not issue checks other than for VERIFIED WINNINGS or return of front money cashier's check money. I am a credit line player only - no front money - so in my case, every penny of checks issued to me represents a WIN.

etc. etc.

[MDawg]

MDawg is Number 1 in your minds and Number 1 in my heart!!

But no one has taken control of the forums and members like MDawg has. For that you have to give him credit whether you like him or not. He has made a fool out of everyone that challenged him.

MDawg is taken more serious than anyone on here currently.
He is taken so seriously that DarkOz gave him 2,000 dollars.
That wasn't good enough so he tipped the Wizard 500 dollars.
I'd say that MDawg is taken very seriously to some members.
DarkOz for starters.

[MDawg]

Let's just face it. You Halfsmoke have little to look forward to lately other than

1) Drinking on Saturdays (Each Saturday, someone would bang a tin pan and yell "Drinking time!" and HalfSmoke would jump up like a fighter coming out at the bell.)

2) Commenting on MDawg

Why, you've become little more lately than UNKewlJ...Jr. Indeed, you've become little more lately than a soft whiner, just like UNKewlJ.

What has sparked placing MDawg so prominently in the forefront of your thoughts?

[Half Smoke]

What has sparked placing MDawg so prominently in the forefront of your thoughts?

since you asked -

your gay bashing of KJ is what did it - if you had not done that I would have mostly left you alone

I've never met KJ - have only conversed with him on various forums in a friendly manner

others do it here too of course, but with them it doesn't bother me nearly so much

you, I must admit, are an extremely intelligent person

for an extremely intelligent person to post that way is especially disgusting to me

in any event, I think I've posted enough about you now - time to crawl back into my very seldom posting style

.

[MisterV]

That little exercise in hubris proved NOTHING however other than the fact that you like many gamblers seem to confuse variance for skill; in other words: "Luck happens." The sampling was far too short in duration to be statistically significant: try again, but this time do it right.

I do do it. Alll the time pal. Not just win…but get people with no life like UNKewlJ, Terapined and HalfSmoke up in arms...

Let's be honest.

What you do is make ridiculous brags and then attack those who quickly conclude that "Oh, this Bozo is full of shit."

You are relentless in your attacks of KJ: why is this?

There are plenty of others here who say they don't believe your "True Fiction" so why do most of us (but not KJ) escape your acerbic pen?

Look, don't get me wrong: you're free to make whatever claim of gambling prowess you want to, but as a necessary corollary we are free to question it and flame you accordingly: it's become the new Online American Way.

[pinchingyourballs]

That little exercise in hubris proved NOTHING however other than the fact that you like many gamblers seem to confuse variance for skill; in other words: "Luck happens." The sampling was far too short in duration to be statistically significant: try again, but this time do it right.

I do do it. Alll the time pal. Not just win…but get people with no life like UNKewlJ, Terapined and HalfSmoke up in arms...

Let's be honest.

What you do is make ridiculous brags and then attack those who quickly conclude that "Oh, this Bozo is full of shit."

You are relentless in your attacks of KJ: why is this?

There are plenty of others here who don't believe your "True Fiction" so do most of us but not KJ) escape your ascerbic pen?

Look, don't get me wrong: you're free to make whatever claim of gambling prowess you want to, but as a necessary corollary we are free to question it and flame you accordingly: it's become the new American Way.

Because Kewl bullshits to the same degree Dawg does. If you're full of shit, nothing bothers you more than another full of shit person calling you out on it.

[MDawg]

I might respond sometimes to questions about my winning. Most of the time I don’t bother.

UNKewlJ has made a full time job of his multi front war trying desperately to ‘stablish himself. It’s life or death to him.

[Rob.Singer]

What has sparked placing MDawg so prominently in the forefront of your thoughts?

since you asked -

your gay bashing of KJ is what did it - if you had not done that I would have mostly left you alone

I've never met KJ - have only conversed with him on various forums in a friendly manner

others do it here too of course, but with them it doesn't bother me nearly so much

you, I must admit, are an extremely intelligent person

for an extremely intelligent person to post that way is especially disgusting to me

in any event, I think I've posted enough about you now - time to crawl back into my very seldom posting style

.

This is like Kamala Harris responding to a question from one of the Fox News leg-crossers.

"Gee you're intelligent, so it turns my stomach when you respond to a lying little fairy with strength and facts---knowing that he's got those crossed wires upstairs!" "It just isn't fair!!"

[Keystone]

I might respond sometimes to questions about my winning. Most of the time I don’t bother.

UNKewlJ has made a full time job of his multi front war trying desperately to ‘stablish himself. It’s life or death to him.

Seems like it`s life or death with you too towel head

[MDawg]

What has sparked placing MDawg so prominently in the forefront of your thoughts?

since you asked -

your gay bashing of KJ is what did it - if you had not done that I would have mostly left you alone

I've never met KJ - have only conversed with him on various forums in a friendly manner

others do it here too of course, but with them it doesn't bother me nearly so much

you, I must admit, are an extremely intelligent person

for an extremely intelligent person to post that way is especially disgusting to me

in any event, I think I've posted enough about you now - time to crawl back into my very seldom posting style

.

This is like Kamala Harris responding to a question from one of the Fox News leg-crossers.

"Gee you're intelligent, so it turns my stomach when you respond to a lying little fairy with strength and facts---knowing that he's got those crossed wires upstairs!" "It just isn't fair!!"

Maybe in the beginning I was using some negatively connotative words to describe UNKewlJ’s homosexuality but for some time now as Dan the Man Dandruff has himself pointed out I’m not one of the ones bashing him. The extent of it might revolve around gentle pokes such as references to his soft whining. Drawing attention to his gay mannerisms. And so on. But not for the purpose of bashing rather to connect his gayness by way of explication for his actions.

UNKewlJ really is more of a - as PunkCity has pointed out repeatedly - more of a self loathing homosexual than a mere homosexual.

Yes you must be so sad as your posts are about everything YOU do here this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand how often you contradict yourself, sometimes one post to the very next post you post this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand how often you post hypocritical posts this forum, you condemn the very behaviour you, yourself post about here this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand that you constantly discredit YOUR OWN character yet claim others are discrediting you.

You must have a mental problem because you display homophobic dislike of yourself for being gay. It’s a nasty queer trait of self loathing homosexuals that manifests with ugly queers. We’ve all meet at least one in our lifetime. It’s that trait you display that give all the good gays a bad name.

As stated you’re a slow moving car wreck. I got beer and popcorn, I love watching you unravel.

But when I call him a male prostitute no insolence is intended my describing him as such is a statement of plain fact.

[accountinquestion]

What has sparked placing MDawg so prominently in the forefront of your thoughts?

since you asked -

your gay bashing of KJ is what did it - if you had not done that I would have mostly left you alone

I've never met KJ - have only conversed with him on various forums in a friendly manner

others do it here too of course, but with them it doesn't bother me nearly so much

you, I must admit, are an extremely intelligent person

for an extremely intelligent person to post that way is especially disgusting to me

in any event, I think I've posted enough about you now - time to crawl back into my very seldom posting style

.

This is like Kamala Harris responding to a question from one of the Fox News leg-crossers.

"Gee you're intelligent, so it turns my stomach when you respond to a lying little fairy with strength and facts---knowing that he's got those crossed wires upstairs!" "It just isn't fair!!"

You got this guy snowed. I'd just shut up and let him think you are intelligent period.

[MisterV]

But when I call him a male prostitute no insolence is intended my describing him as such is a statement of plain fact.

OK, fair enough, but let's take it a step further.

You are, by report, a wealthy man and a successful attorney.

Nothing wrong with that.

But as an attorney you are held to a higher standard of truthfulness than the average swiniging dick or smelly cunt who haunts this cesspool.

So...you say it is a "plain fact" that KJ is "a male prostitute."

Note: you didn't say you "suspect" or "believe" he is one, you said he "is" one.

I now request you provide proof of your seemingly (if untrue) defamatory claim.

Hound, you've been saying this shit forever: put up or shut up, 'K?

[PositiveVariance]

The proof is in the pudding that when witnessed I played and won exactly the way I have claimed all along. I won and pressed into every hand in the only run on that entire shoe when I won the DarkOz Challenge wager as witnessed and verified by the Wizard. How’d MDawg do dat?

Yes, it happened...good for you.

That little exercise in hubris proved NOTHING however other than the fact that you like many gamblers seem to confuse variance for skill; in other words: "Luck happens."

The sampling was far too short in duration to be statistically significant: try again, but this time do it right.

Exactly.
Small sample size, positive variance.

Since it was a small sample size, MDAWG had about a 50% chance of coming out ahead. Now, if there was "doubling up" or "Martingale" betting, the odds could have been over 90% to come out ahead. Since Wizard was there to verify the session, I'm confident there were no significant periods of Martingale betting. We really need to know the exact sequence of betting to put a probability on the likelihood of being ahead after the session. I believe it was somewhere around a 60% probability of being ahead.

I give MDAWG credit for showing up and winning the challenge, but it proves nothing. What we didn't get to see, is what would have happened if he started losing? We don't know because the session wasn't long enough.

[MHF]

Mere Puffery Is Permitted

Although bars can be critical of lawyers’ violation of their duty of candor, the rules typically recognize that lawyers will not run afoul of the ethical requirements unless they know that evidence they are presenting to a tribunal is false. Arguments, statements, and evidence submitted to a tribunal must comply with ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 3.3, which provides, in relevant part: “A lawyer shall not knowingly: make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer.” Bars and courts also recognize, however, that lawyers are permitted to engage in “puffery” without violating any requirements of truthfulness or candor. It is assumed that most people can tell the difference between mere puffery (or “spin”) and other statements that could mislead the public. A lawyer being bullish about the value of their case or strengths of their position is not the same as introducing evidence that a lawyer knows is false.

The distinction between exaggeration, bravado, or puffery, on one hand, and deception, fraud, or misdirection, on the other, is also illustrated by states’ laws against false advertising for lawyers. For example, in Georgia, OCGA 10-1-424.1 restricts solicitation in media of legal services and prohibits lawyers from soliciting in media in a way that fails to “accurately reflect” the legal services, abilities, practice areas, scope of work, success rate, claim or case management and oversight, or fees of a person.” In this way, states recognize the harm that can result when lawyers are not truthful or candid in their statements to the public.

Probably more a problem of taking things out of context, in the overly literal, or analytical, sense.

For example, it's allowed to have a Defendant noted in default, for not submitting a defense, on time, but, it's hardly right when the Defendant still wants to file one.

[MDawg]

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post173701

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post173702