Originally Posted by
BensonBingham_1
This is a tricky case because it involves both personal responsibility and the obligations of the casino. Like bars, casinos are generally expected to stop serving alcohol to visibly intoxicated individuals, but the laws surrounding casinos can be different depending on the state. The fact that he lost the lawsuit suggests that the court may have prioritized his personal responsibility over the casino’s role in continuing to serve him. However, if there was clear evidence that the casino violated local regulations regarding alcohol service, he might have had a stronger case.