Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
.

Originally Posted by Kim Lee View Post
I faded Stanford Wong's dice action, and would do it again.

per the link Wong has backed off his claim that craps can be beaten with dice influencing -

but I don't see how Kim Lee's fading of Wong's dice action would be advantageous - the HE is still there - maybe he just did it for fun - that would be my guess

"And finally, in April 2011, in a tacit admission that he had been wrong in believing casino craps could be legitimately beaten, Wong removed craps from the list of “Beatable Casino Games” on his popular BJ21.com website, and also removed the “Craps” discussion page from his site, as well. In addition, a few months later, in October 2011, in an interview on Bob Dancer’s popular KLAV radio program, “Gambling With an Edge,” Wong admitted that for players “who want to get serious about making money in casinos, craps is not the game to play.” That pretty much says it all."


https://www.lasvegasadvisor.com/gamb...lKZDMXMJRCnon3

.
But Alan M. always said DI was a legitimate method of profiting from gambling. And he's witnessed it as well as having had some success with it. An actual player!

Doesn't that supercede anything a guy like Wong comes up with, who won't lift a finger, print a word, or say a thing unless it benefits him commercially?