Coach Belly is mis-representing the event in which Eliot was called in to evaluate. I know a little bit about it because I discussed it privately with Eliot.
First the play didn't occur in Las Vegas. Didn't even occur in the United States. It occurred in an area that deals with all the real high rollers.
Second while the man's play extended over several years, it was only 3-4 short trips a year over several years. So you are still only talking a handful of days play. very small sample size, so yeah it could have very easily just been positive variance. That is why they were so cautious.
Now compare that, maybe 10 trips of a few days each over several years to what Mdawg has claimed Hundreds of days played (and won) EVERY year for 6 years now or so. THAT is NOT a small sample size and CANNOT just be variance.
So not nearly the same situation, as belly is trying to claim. But nice try.
Furthermore, Dawg claims he has played at an advantage all these hundreds of days over all these years now. Does he now through coach belly want to claim all the winning that he has claimed (some of it walked back) was just a degenerate gambler getting lucky? is that what you are now claiming dog? (through coach belly)





Reply With Quote