becaause my basic story isn't about how much free play we accumulated and played throughout the years. My basic story is an has always been about blackjack. So when discussing some side topic like free play, I had to think about it and estimate a number on the fly. It isn't something I could even go back and look. And then when you think about it a little more, you think well maybe that number is not quite right. Maybe a little high or low. So you say that. And the trolls like you jump!
And people like you repeating this troll exercise is why so many real APs have left this forum and those that remain, rarely share anything. Because your life is sitting there waiting to pounce with some "gottch ya" moment that is completely irrelevant.
My basic story and the details about blackjack NEVER changes! So much so that people have said stupid shit, like I have "worn it smooth".
Some of you trolls say it is worn smooth, while others say it changes. Which the fuck is it? The fact is you clowns with say and do anything and then say the opposite a day later. That is called throwing spaghetti at the wall and seeing what if any sticks.![]()
Last edited by kewlJ; 12-18-2025 at 01:34 PM.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
The difference between us is I know a lot of stuff and clearly understand the distinction when I know what is fact vs what are my assumptions. I also am willing to admit to operating off assumptions.
You on the other hand when confronted with something you don't know - you just go off on wild-ass incredibly unlikely stories.
Why do you think that is? Could it be that when it comes down to it some of us are actually interested in real AP talk and some of are far more interested in conveying the impression that they're an expert.
I'm just saying you repeated mcaps post many times now. Lol. Thats the best you can do and even Mcap said something about me not being able to determine who is an expert in sports betting. Which is far from anything I claimed as I only claimed Redietz to be an expert in cfb. His response wasn't even directly relevant and most likely driven from the fact that I don't think counting bj to be some great AP angle if you're doing it longterm professionally as your dominant source of income. A guy who goes to LV a few times a year? Sure great - have at it.
Doing it full time every week of your life? Intense concentration and all the other various issues? Concentration on something that will become incredibly mundane and repetitive if you do it full time for years on end.
lol ok we can agree Singer is clown. I still think you're our lovable mascot. When shit is down and the posters are hiding out, you come out on the field waving your hands sashaying about. 'Mmmmmmmmm-daaawg how dare you!'
Unlikely shit does happen in gambling. Especially if you play as much as I have for a living for 22 years. Sometimes unlikely bad, sometime unlikely good. I once saw a dealer at a 6 deck blackjack game pull 6 straight aces and then a 5 for a 21. I forget what my hand was but it was not a 21 and I had my max bet out and lost. Imagine that, the count was so +, indicating many 10's and aces, and then you see all those aces. But in a pattern that was like WTF!!!! I can only imagine the odds the math dudes would come up with A, A, A, A, A, A, 5. probably 18 y.o. in a row territory.
As far as Mdawg, forget for a minute that there is no way in hell Las Vegas casinos which are pretty sharp, would allow a player to win 10's of millions of dollars at any table game, for 7 years now, playing rated, while not 86ing him. He tells the opposite that they love him and comp him out the ass. That is a bigger fantasy-fiction than anything that has ever been told on any gambling forum. It is bigger fantasy that any non gambling story like jack and the beanstalk, or Cinderella.
But forget that for a moment. When he says some specific things about blackjack, like that he played a 1-50 spread ($100-$5000) for 10 straight hours, playing double deck (sweatiest game) at the sweatiest casino on the strip, I a real player have EVERY right to call bullshit. That is not real. And you know who else said he didn't believe it when Dawg repeated it on his site? Michael Shackleford. mawgs friend and protector. Wizard said he didn't believe that and then Dawg started backtracking, "well maybe it wasn't 10 hours, maybe it was 8 and a half. maybe it wasn't this, but that instead. (STILL DIDN'T HAPPEN).
But as a guy who has played millions of rounds of blackjack in Las Vegas and supported myself for 22 years, 16 in Las Vegas, I have every right to say, that is bullshit about Mdawg, Rob Singer or any other person that comes along telling a bullshit story. Mdawg is a guy writing or telling a fiction story. he came from a forum that he owns or is associated with that he promotes that is a forum for people writing stories. Thats all well and good, but you can NOt come to a gambling forum telling those stories and expect no pushback from real players that know how things work.
Last edited by kewlJ; 12-18-2025 at 02:23 PM.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
You can't continue to confront other members and expect no pushback...that's not how things work.
You are not the definitive authority on what is bullshit.
You haven't investigated anyone else's adventures and experiences, or provided any evidence you've uncovered to contradict their stories...even when you've been invited and encouraged to do so.
So your expertise and authority doesn't extend beyond what you think.
I am not sure who else I have been "invited or encouraged" to investigate?
But this is a fair point. I don't challenge everybody. If someone is making a claim that is mathematically possible and falls within the way things actually work (reality), I don't challenge them even if I may not believe the claim or think they have embellished. It is only when what is being claimed is just complete bullshit....fairytale shit, that I call bullshit. And that means most AP's that are claiming something possible, I wont challenge, even if I don't believe their story or parts or amounts.
The exception would be Moses. Moses was an AP. Turns out not exactly at the level he claimed, but he was an AP. Moses claims were possible of the amounts of money won playing blackjack. BUT those amounts were not possible for the length of time he claimed in Reno. THAT is what I challenged, that he could have done what he claimed in Reno.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
Wow & Goody!....another opportunity to toss a few zingers at kew!
The key coach is kew likes to lie about others' reports because he HAS to. In his crossed-wires-upstairs rules, whatever he claims just has to be true. Remember, he's coming from a position of incredible weakness, and his choice to be a homo is easily traced back to that. And if he did accept what those who have always had him pegged have said, he'd become just another high-rise jumper in LV. Do you believe he could ever sleep at night if he doesn't keep repeating the same lies in the hope that he's convincing others of them?
If you want evidence whenever kew makes his claims--about himself or anybody else--you're barking up the wrong tree. He's the Gavin Newsome of the gambling forums world: "Required of thee but not of me". Again, in his twisted low-income/non-productive world, he has never gotten it right with his "I know how casinos & LV works, and that is not the way it works". He desperately needs and wants to be the final authority on his allegations and assertions of that which he does not agree with or understand, but he regularly comes up short.
The biggest phony on the internet likes to rail against everything mdawg, yet (and you are spot on about this) he continually refuses to accept any of mdawg's challenges of proof. The same with a few others, which is why he calls his critics "trolls"--a sissified word for keyboard warriors like him if there ever was one. Not having proof when it's available is a sacred trait of online trolls. That way they can safely, albeit stupidly in the eyes of others, continue to lie in order to makes themselves feel good. He stays clear of mdawg's challenges, just as he chickened out of coming to AZ. to see our Newell when I posted the address, in person like he claimed he would
With me he likes to define me by loose interpretations, fantasy, a poorly thought out set of ìnside rv pics, and a rejection of all that is real, simply because he's upset that I score so many wonderful direct hits on the him, and because he knows I know most real things about him. And him knowing he's the king of lies over the years only serves for him to be compelled to keep on telling the same old lies over and over again.
I see he just started ANOTHER thread about himself, in which it looks like redietz sliced and diced him up in minutes. Kew has never been accused of carefully writing and double-checking what he posts, and he rightfully pays for it time after time.
But be gentle on the gay concocter. It's fun watching him constantly get chopped down, only to go on another posting blitz as he tries so hard to convince people he's something he's not.![]()
Last edited by Rob.Singer; 12-18-2025 at 03:31 PM.
Even statements like this, while almost irrelevent, with little real meaning toward any discussion, shows how little you know about what you are talking about.
You think card counters have to sit there concentrating on what they are doing.
Think back to when you were a kid learning to ride a bike. For a couple weeks you had to really concentrate on what you were doing. Peddling and steering and shifting your weight just the right way so as to stay balanced.
Fast forward a couple months and you are cruising down the street, no hands on handlebar, unwrapping a piece of bubble gum barely even noticing where you are going.
THAT my friend (mate) is how card counting works after a very short time. You are on auto-pilot. And if you are smart, that frees you up to do other things than can be beneficial. Notice what pit is doing and any heat that may be coming. Check out a nearby table and see if there might be some opportunity there.
Only a person with very little experience would think and/or say something about sitting there, concertation on the cards. And then double down on their wrong assumptions.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
Whats the word on Newsome? I knew very little about him but he's been running a train on Trump. All the other dems are basically a different version of Kewl but in national politics. Before he started pointing out who and what Trump is .. he was just another governor to me.
I didn't know you live in Cali btw. Or do you just take in your news from fake news and they have nothing real to write about... so they go on and on repeating stories about how Newsome is bad. (Trump is good)
Anyway.. serious question, whats the story on Newsome? Is this some fucking mask reference from 5 years ago? More to it? Whats he got hiding in his closet that isn't known?
Yea, I know.. your brain breaks into 2 things and you sit around thinking about life why the sub-brain just counts magically. It is also why you can count 3 tables at once.
While I'm sure it becomes a lot easier with time and second nature (duh, obviously) - you still have to occupy your mind constantly with the count. You can sit there and tell us how easy it is for Mr BJ-master but whatevers. I doubt you can count just fine and think 100% on other things.
THink what you want but find us another blackjack player who has written about doing that for years and how they like to count and keep up with it. It is mundane and repetitive as fuck. You can say I don't know what I'm talking about and while I have never gotten good at counting the fact remains. Yea, you can look around and glance at the pitboss and everything else. I'd like to see you have a really indepth convo that wasn't surface-level small talk and maintain the count.. maybe.. but very doubtful just like you counting 3 tables at once.
My low income/non-productive world hun?
Rob which of us has:
Bankruptcies, evictions, legal judgements against us?
Lived in a trailer Park in Pahrump during the very period he claimed to have been winning millions of dollars?
Was kicked off the foodstamp program in Nevada at that same time he claimed he was winning millions of dollars? (since removed or dropped off his record)
And now, his retirement play is mooching off his children?
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
I don't like to talk politics too much because it is so divisive, when it should not be. You discover someone with some different political view, and all of the sudden they are your enemy. You can't have a decent conversation with them about anything. It shouldn't be THAT way. (BTW, Rob Sneider and James Woods, both big Trump supporters, both expressed similar thoughts in the recent days following Rob Riener and his Wife's death).
But if we are goingb to talk politics. Gavin Newsome CANNOT be the democratic nominee or they will lose. Kamala Harris who has been looking like she intends to run, CANNOT be the democratic nominee or they will lose. Pete Buttigieg CANNOT be the democratic nominee or they will lose.
Dems need to look and find a moderate, younger 50's/60s' white man if they want to win. And repubs should do the same. Moderate.
I actually have someone in mind right now on the republican side that I could support. Glenn Younkin. he is not Maga (which is never what people think it was) and he is not extreme.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
This is you doubling/tripling down on something you know absolutely nothing about. AinQ, you really have KJ derangement syndrome mentioned earlier. If I say something you will fight me on it, no matter what it is, no matter how little you know about what is being discussed. hell, I think we are to the point that you will fight me when you know 100% you are wrong.
Take the tracking of a second table that you just mentioned (just about a thing of the past now, as there are few situations where it would work). YOU and others continue to mock this. But when this discussion came about several other blackjack players weighed in at different places that they too had done some form of this. Richard Munchkin, Don Schlesinger, A known BJ player that was here for a short while, and has asked me not to use his name on this forum and I believe a couple more. I think RS_ the known blackjack player from WOV and here (shortly) said he had done so. (RS_ used to go by rolling stoned. Don't confuse him with Rob Singer). If Kim Lee shows up again, I will ask him. I will bet he did some version of this.
So numerous other real and experienced blackjack players have done this also. And I didn't copy anything from anyone, because we didn't even know of anyone else until discussion after I had mentioned it.
AinQ, can you really not see how KJ obsessive you have become (just like a few others) If I say the grass is green, you will fight me.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
The Mdawg challenge is NOT a real thing. THAT is why no one has accepted. In the wording of the challenge Mdawg states or stated if he has changed it) that he would prove to my satisfaction. Well he canNOT prove to my satisfaction. records can be doctored, altered, AI generated. So I will not accept that. So by default I win the challenge, as he can't prove anything to my satisfaction. I'll bet he won't pay up.I don't want his money so he can make a donation to NPHY (Nevada Partnership for homeless youth). Let me know when you have done so Dawg.
Now here is what I would accept as a challenge. Dawg has claimed he has won, about 90-95% of his sessions for years now, totaling tens of millions of dollars. He has NEVER reported a losing trip. He has NEVER reported a losing month. So he should be able to duplicate that for a month or so. We can compensate someone to follow Dawg for a month recording his play. he can play as often and long as he wants. But every session needs to be recorded by the independent monitor. None of this, I played a couple big winning sessions that weren't included.
And at the end of the month period, we will just see if the monitored recorded sessions come anywhere close to the winning percentage and amounts he claims and has claimed for years now.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
Oh, this is just something that can never be proven nor can you demonstrate.
Just like you counting 3 tables. You can insist you are superman counter or whatever the fuck but it doesn't mean you're more right. Of COURSE you'll fight for whatever you claimed and never back down. You have something no one else can prove. Even when it can be demonstrated you made it up and everyone else is laughing - you don't back down.
Come'on Kewl. No one takes you seriously and very few will. ZenKing?
I have seen nothing to suggest you even have the capability of being honest to yourself as far as your mental ability while keeping a running count.
There is no derangement here, we just know you're full of shit about so much. Not too bright. etc etc. Counting Cards seems like it'd really blow as far as a longterm profession. For many many reasons - many of which are the same reasons people don't believe your story as a whole.
I NEVER mocked tracking a second table. At some point you suggested you could and did on occasion track 3.. I'm not why you keep switching it around but it is like everything with you - disengenious and only meant to try and reinforce this life narrative you present. Reality has no value to you when on the forums. You went with 2 then upped it to 3 and people were like wtf lol. Same pattern you've demonstrated repeatedly. Now when I bring it up and say 3 tables, you respond as if I said 2 when it is very clear. You live in fantasyland. Sorry.
Newsome is too liberal for main stream America. And even if he weren't too liberal, and was moderate enough, he is perceived as a California liberal and can't win in main stream, main street America. Same as Bernie sanders, OAC, Elizabeth warren could never win.
To be honest, I don't think a female can win in main stream, main street American. Nor a gay guy. Even if their politics were right to do so.
Expected Value is NOT an opinion.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)