Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Does Mickey agree that those were the original terms? "I would have no problem laying someone 100 to 1 that they won't be ahead on a 98% game after 1 million hands."

Because if there were no other terms, I can't understand why he's objecting to the play on a 100-hand machine? And I would think that if the WOV guys would agree with Mickey, I can't understand why those smart fellows wouldn't have stipulated from the start that it had to be on a single line machine. I would think that as smart as they all are, these details would not be left till later.
Technically, Alan, "100-play video poker" is never labeled "100-hand video poker." There's a reason for that.

If you're going by the letter of the law, mickey should have stipulated a single line machine. If you're going by the letter of the law, coach should have argued for "plays" being the bet, not "hands." Plays are not hands. That's why the games makers felt it necessary to call them "100-play" machines and not "100 hands" machines. In fact, there may be a legal requirement they be called plays rather than hands. Regnis, any thoughts on that?

It comes down to definitions, possibly legal definitions.