Quote:
Originally Posted by
accountinquestion
I seek laughs secondary to attention. You have your motivations confused, dorkus amongus.
Honestly all bs aside I find you ok MisterV but you seem to want to "dance" or whatever you call it so get into the ring with the rest of us clowns. You don't seem to get that though.
Look, I have a *spreadsheet* with 18 fucking lines. That is line fucking 1 through line fucking 18. If that isn't 18 proofs then what other proof do you need?
Idiot.
In honestly honesty you truly are a dope, MisterV. You seem to think that finding a person to judge is secondary to the fact that Kewl has never once suggested he'd post up money. I'm not sure under what reality you 2 live in would you expect me to just give him money to prove some random fact about himself? Like he gets to choose? I know very little about the Wizard. He might be as gullible as you. I'd take Dan Druff any day. At least he is appropriately skeptical.
And assuming this is a bet where he puts up something - why has he never broached the subject about how he is going to go about doing it? You may not understand gambling that well but that'd be a HUGE freeroll for him. He has nothing to lose. lol. I put up money and he doesn't? huh? Why absolutely zero effort on his part to explain why he isn't or shouldn't post?
You have a spread sheet now? Good lord, you really have turned into Mega (not Maga) Troll.
Lets go back to the beginning. This is a gambling forum supposedly, or was before it became nothing but a troll forum. Players were supposed to be able to come here and share some experiences if they want. And they shouldn't have to defend every freaking think like they are on trial. We are NOT on trial.
I made it clear from day 1 on this forum that I would not prove a thing to anyone. Everyone has the option to read what I say and decide for themselves whether they believe it or not. I think I explain myself and what I do in enough detail that there really shouldn't be any question except by those that are really just trolling....habitual trolls if you will. And them, I don't care what they think.
And I have stood by this principal that no one has to prove anything every step of the way. Sure there are some things I could easily prove. I am not going down that road. No one is required to prove anything. And those that try, well we get a picture of a guy in an RV at the dealership or some clown spreading cash and chips on a bed thinking that proves he won something.
Now you made these accusation at me...that you could prove at least 18 things I said are lies. I KNOW you can't because there aren't 18 things I said that are lies. there aren't 5, unless you are talking about things that just don't matter like I said I went to Villanova then I said i didn't, said I was gay and another time said I wasn't. these things are things completely irrelevant to anything. they aren't about what i do or who I am as a professional AP.
So you made this accusation that you could prove 18 things, not once, not twice, but dozens (like 40) times now. So finally, I said Ok lets have at it. Take one of the things you have frequently mentioned. That I broke my arm (fracture really) during the back room incident. You can't prove that I didn't. So I have to prove that I did. And to do that, there is some risk of information being exposed that I would rather not be exposed. So lets put some money on it.
If you now want to call that a "free roll" because you KNOW you can't prove what you have said 40 times, that is your problem not mine. You shouldn't have said it.
You HAVE the opportunity to prove the accusation you have stated 40 times. And when you can't I will prove that it did happen, something I really don't beleive in doing. But yes I think there should be some money tied to it. And if you can prove what you claim, you can win the money. If you can't (which it is pretty obvious you are now backing away from and I can prove it did......I win the money. What is the problem?
And we can go through this exercise for EACH of the 18 things that you think you can prove. So far you have mentioned only 2 and one the shuffle machine situation I have no way to prove at this point except exposing the tech guy involved which would have consequences for him, so that is off the table for me. But pick another, you should still have 16 on your list. lets see if we can agree on another and put some money on that.
What I am hearing you say is you don't want money involved because you know you can't prove 18 things. So just say that. Say "yeah I was only playing game (trolling) and there aren't 18 things I can prove are lies. Otherwise, you are a real small man and lowlife, and together you and I have proven that today.
