Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
So I must not understand your point.
In the last little while, crimm has been widely wrong on the numbers at least twice while presenting himself as an expert. But you ignore that, and instead only care about testing red's decades-old memories.

If anyone tried to scrutinize my play history, I would look like the biggest liar ever because I just don't remember the details.
Don't recall ever referring to myself as an expert. I've made mistakes gillions of times doing gambling math. That's why I usually go over it 3 or four times. In this case I didn't do it. But I immediately admitted I made a mistake.

The 2nd one you referred to is not a mistake at all. I said NSUD was closer to Ugly Ducks and it is. The two strategies almost mirror each other. That's because the flush and full house pay the same with the straight flush being just one off.

But ditz was still running a big deficit. Ugly Ducks is under 99%. That's a big deficit. Jean Scott did not advise him to play that game.

BTW, using a Jacks or Better game like Double Bonus to try to calculate a Deuce game like Ugly Ducks is just downright funny. I kept my mouth shut about it. Didn't criticize. But since I'm being now being criticized by the person that did it, hey what the hell?
The analysis you posted on Wolf Run Eclipse recently was excellent and clearly shows you know exactly how to use math to make money at casinos. From the knowledge of what metrics to collect on the machine to how to crunch them shows expertise. Your analysis of Must Hit By's, other banked game slots, progressive Keno and some of the specialized VP games at Montana bars are also terrific. You worked out the correct strategy for Draw Til you Win with pencil and paper to make a lot of money on this game. Any poster calling your skill set into question is giving an utterly absurd take on your skills as an advantage player.