I think that's probably right. Virologists said from the beginning that it would definitely mutate into something more transmissible, and it's logical that more particle expulsion would do that. However they also said (and very early on I might add) that coronaviruses are not very amenable to vaccines because they mutate too quickly, iirc even though there were only a few variants widespread there were already something like 30 variants within several months, but it was estimated there were probably hundreds not known of.
But I got to burst your bubble here and say pretty much all mask studies say cloth masks become pretty useless after 20mins or so after being saturated with moisture. Hell even Fauci admitted about 6 months ago that the masking thing may not have been based on actual science. So as maxpen would say: masking RIP.
A traditional vaccine... of course it is. Why would you ask me that? Because the efficacy is not 100%??
Like what happened in Sweden?? Oh that's right, nope that didn't happen... and pretty much no lockdowns there at all in the first year. In fact their overall mortality is still much lower than the US, Italy, UK etc... We have tons of lockdown data now and no conclusion can really be drawn whether it helped or not. I've seen the data parsed up a million ways too.
Well sure we all know people who died of Covid, and some of them actually did. But we monetarily incentivized hospitals to get Covid on as many death certificates as possible, so a LOT of people died of Covid... (or with Covid... among other things) ...who knows??
Umm... some of the Pfizer trials data has been available for a long time now. I read some of it and I'll sum it up in one word: FRAUD.
Ya think lol??
![]()





Reply With Quote