Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
In his Integrity Sports ad redietz told prospective investors what they could expect to make on the season. I think it was around 15 or 20%, something like that.Originally Posted by coach bellyThey pay him for his opinion. They value his opinion.
They continue to pay for his advice only if it's profitable.
There is no way to mathematically quantify an opinion.
The conclusion of your "if/then" scenario below is null...the hypothesis does not exist.
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
And they had to deliver the money to him, not make the bets themselves. Redietz would never go for letting clients make their own bets unless they paid up front for each pick. What's to guarantee he gets paid if he relies on them paying up after a win? And they could give his picks away.
Just for the record: Not hard to look up and quote accurately...if you want to do so.
A quaint little site, but all things considered, I'm proud of it considering when it was posted. No exaggerations, precision in reporting of results, completely accurate and above board.
One thing I worry about is "APs," whose job requires absolute precision, when they are incredibly sloppy at reporting other things. I mean, really, how hard is this to look up? So one gets concerned about their reporting of their own narratives. Obviously this is a very old site (ballpark 1998), so what I was doing in, say, 2015, would not be what I was doing in 1998.
https://web.archive.org/web/20101014...itysports.com/
Reply With Quote