I am not going to keep piling on Redietz. I think everything that need be said has been said, by many parties. I think everyone has drawn their own conclusions by now. I do think an interview with Druff or Munchkin would have been helpful. But it became pretty apparent early on Red was never going to do so, despite his saying that he would on this forum.

In the end, don't need that interview. There are just too many inconsistencies and things that don't add up. The "EV" comments. The "anonymous" comments. A guy claiming to be a professional sports handicapper/bettor, that doesn't even understand the math involved with what he is claiming. And the final straw, just like Mdawg and Singer, the vicious nasty attacks of anyone that doubts him.

In conclusion, I know the thread and post made yesterday with an admission was a fake post/thread. I knew it the second I saw it because Red would never come clean like that. And I don't approve of the impersonator type post. But it really was spot on in almost every aspect. I think that post thread was probably 90% correct.

I guess one key moment for me was when I asked Red what kind of money he made (average) per year and he didn't answer. I guess he could have lied and come up with a figure. But the reason I asked is because I just don't believe Bob Dietz made much money doing what he claims. he may have made some, but not what he sort of leads us to believe. Shades of the late Moses, who for a decade claimed to be a professional blackjack player playing Reno and on his deathbed confessed that he made about 100k over 10 years. 10k a year is NOT a professional blackjack player. And I have a feeling Reds situation is similar.

Anyway, for me, this is the end of the Redietz, 40 years professional sports better, with the high IQ that is better and smarter than everyone else. Final word: Tout.