Meet up with "Rob"

[coach belly]

I see that Rob addressed this earlier, but since the question was directed at me,
I'll go ahead and reply anyway.

Anyone else see the irony in this statement?

When you (eddie) writes "Coach belly is suggesting" and "So what you're saying then is"
you are putting words in my mouth.
Where is the irony in that statement?

Old Rob constantly says Alan is an addicted gambler.

That is obviously not a lie, it's his opinion....doesn't meet my standards,
and you've displayed here that you don't really understand what a lie is.

Old Rob denies ever posting under someone else's name in the forums. Anyone here remember the "jatki" incident?

This is before my time here, but looking through the archives I couldn't find where Alan confirms that Rob posted as jatki.
Until Alan confirms that Rob posted under someone else's name, then this remains an allegation, and cannot be considered a lie.

Old Rob said years ago that he never plays VP over $2 any longer, but later posts jackpots he won on $25 VP machines.

In 2011 he said that he didn't play over $2, then in 2014 he played @ $25.
When are you suggesting that he lied...in 2011 or 2014?
Seems to me that he simply changed his mind in 2014 and played @ higher stakes.

Dan Druff provides proof via date and time stamps that Old Rob did not win jackpots when he says he did.

Apparently Dan's "proof" has little to no evidential value, he hasn't proved anything, so this does not meet the standard for a lie.

New Rob says Old Rob was a fabricated online persona. Alan himself confirms it was all an act. Doesn't that cast doubt on everything Old Rob posted?

I suppose it could for some, as could your failure to provide an example of a Singer lie casts doubt on everything you have posted.
Liars assume that everybody else is always lying, but assuming a lie is not proof of a lie...is it?