Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Printable View
Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Semantics. Now get back to muttering your gibberish...RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
The "value" of discussing thirty-year-old corny classics that you've each watched at least five times, with only Monet, to the point of pretending to be highly reviewed movie, and music, critics?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI use this forum to discuss documentaries, movies and, occasionally music. So for me the forum has value.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Now I wonder that you are the poor cousin, but, Monet, the rich one. I mean, with all of the supposedly important AP-emails - before Druff, Druff, let on that he reads them all - that changed hands between you, and, Monet, then shouldn't you be putting up pictures of the likes of his supposed $40,000 jackpots?
Hardly. And, it hardly takes two lawyers, or the likes of PosV, or you. I realized that KJ was totally full of it, at least ten years ago, after he posted up rather disparate earnings results, supposedly, for consecutive years of very similar play. I mean, anyone who did thus simulations could immediately spot the nonsense. After tens of thousand of hands of anything, you're going to get results down to the same second decimal place, each time.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenSemantics. Now get back to muttering your gibberish...RIPQuote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
P.S. It never ceases to amaze me how almost every single one of you guys is five to ten years behind the times.
And, years later, KJ looking at the other two tables in the mirrors on the ceiling. Betting, supposedly, $706 instead of $700 to fool the pit. Good God. Anyone who believed such, sight unseen, let alone argue endlessly over it, has to have his head examined.
BillYung do you just make shit up to suit yourself? This is the kind of stuff that irks me and ends up drawing me back in for no reason, but it does irk me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Let's start with the second statement $706 instead of $700. Never said anything even remotely like this. Not even the same universe. Betting odd amounts is known as rainbow wagering because it involved different denomination and color chips. Some "shot-takers" both AP and not AP's attempt to do this trying to entice dealer mistakes which they will point out when not in their favor and say nothing when it is in their favor. But pit folks now know this so betting odd amounts only draws a little extra attention from pit.
More importantly for me, I am an opponent of rainbow wagering (or betting odd amounts) because it slows the game down. For a card counter, time is money. Slower games means less EV and money earned. It is that simple. But additionally, when a card counter has his max bet or bigger bets out is the time he is most exposed. So again, you want the game moving along. The last thing you want to do is sit there exposed with your bigger bet while the dealer figures out the payout on some odd amount blackjack and the pit has to come over to verify. So this is just made up. I never said anything even close to this.
Now I will go back to the first statement. Consecutive years right down to the second digit. Just to be clear you are talking like $83k, two consecutive years? I got rid of most of my records for all but the last 5 years or so, not long ago. Just clogging up too much space on the computer. But I almost positive I have never had two consecutive years down to the second digit. As a matter of fact, during much of my time in Vegas, I have had "yo-yo" ing years. One under expectation, the next over, the next under....that type of thing. Trying to give you the benefit of doubt, I have talked about "averages" alot. For a long time, I was averaging just about 80k from blackjack and another 20k from supplemental AP play. But that 80k average would be 74k, 88k, 81k and so on.
So can I ask you to link to both these statements?
edit: by exposed, I mean the pit and surveillance has extra time to notice and evaluate the bet spread. That is the danger area. We want the game to move along....nice even flow.
No. I have some decent "gibberish" to get back to, but, let it to the supposed #1 AP on here to try to prematurely discredit my results, to be posted, fairly shortly, God willing. I guess that even a theory of everything, finally, reduced to a few pages of simple math, just isn't worth his time, either. First, and last, time I made such a claim, that it's done, and, so, now it's time to put up, or, shut up. What's wrong, you guys afraid of real, and actual, proof? I know that neither AP will bet unless it's basically a sure thing, but, I had no idea how afraid of a bit of proof.
Regardless, suffice it to say that you, apparently, over as many years, have as few students as Singer, and MDawg, put together. And, so, who could care less about your millions, either? No followers translates to a bunch of hooey that ceases to exist the moment that you do.
I pointed out the contradictions in his story, more than once long ago:
Part of where the UNKewl one keeps tripping himself up is in contradictions. He talks about how he barely wins $50. average in a session. At other times talks about how he buys in for so little chips - in the region of $150. - $250. - that he draws no attention to himself. Then he talks about how he declined to start another session because he was $3000. short of the "mandatory" $7000. he needs to play. Very contradictory.
I also pointed out that his entire fictionalized blackjack story fit too neatly into a "I won exactly what was expected" - someone else, I believe it was AccountInQuestion, mentioned that someone playing like that, unrated, no consistent play, couldn't even know exactly what his handle (amount passed over the circle) was, to begin to figure out what was "expected" over a period of many years.
Well, now others too know that it was all fiction. All neatly packaged into something he read about, and assumed.
Red to green spread, never amounting to much of anything. SeedValue was right.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Idiot keeps trying to deflect the fact that he was caught in a series of monstrous lies as something to do with "popularity."
Tater/Moses once described it as a nervous poodle barking at a glass of water.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
I sat down, to peel an apple, thought of the retard Axlewolf, or whatever he calls himself, who, a few months ago, talked about a fishing licence in most every state. I got around to looking it up, but, wasn't posting, then. If I recall, about $2,500 to do that. Anyway, AW went on to note that he barely did any fishing. Around the time, Crimm yakked about the west coast bars to pick up pocket change, that he liked to make that run.
Come to think of it, I almost miss old, Blackhole. Summed things up fairly well with the AP crowd. But, old, Blackhole just had to go "cray cray" with the fiddles. I guess that one of the AP nuts must have paid off Druff, Druff, to ban old, Blackhole. Ha.
P.S. Well, speak of the devil, and, there he is. The Hole just posted at GF's, another long one and funny one. Lol.
Bill, what the fuck are you talking about ? For starters, I very rarely use the PM system here. As you correctly pointed out, Dan reads everyone's PMs, so now I never use the PM system unless it is something I don't care he or the world knows about, and I rarely used it before like I wrote above. My exchanges with Monet were and are in the VCT public forum, not through PMs. I don't consider myself a movie or music critic - I just post up movies, documentaries and music that I like and watch or listen to suggestions made by Monet and others. These are often followed up by discussions of the watched or suggested material. This may not have value for you, but it has value for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Which do you value more, your Fields Medal, or your Physics Nobel Prize medal ?
You are quoting a guy who later admitted he was wrong. That is very dishonest. Below are Moses/taters final two posts to/about me.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tater, post: 145261, member: 4004
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tater, post: 145262, member: 4004
KJ, you say you won't give proof of the claim.
I agree that nobody here is obligated to provide proof of any claim.
BUT (and it's a big BUT) when you did IN FACT OFFER PROOF by saying the lawsuit had been filed: well, that changes everything.
You made an affirmative representation with the intention of corroborating your story.
As people understandably doubt your claim they did the logical, sensible thing: they checked the relevant court records, looking for the filing you spoke of.
No filing was found.
One question, KJ: WHERE'S THE BEEF?
You opened the damned door, so don't go whining about the bullies finding zero corroboration to your seemingly bogus claim.
You got the attention you crave, but...is it going to be worth the price you will have to pay?
You didn't check out even the "Hot Sucker" thread, which, according to Monet, was everything that an aspiring AP needed to know? Aka, the supposed guide to acquiring all manner of ultra- tacky and cheap casino gift-shop junk, to give away to friends, instead of pay a bit for something nice? What multimillionaire on the face of the planet would bother, let alone via casinos?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayBill, what the fuck are you talking about ? For starters, I very rarely use the PM system here. As you correctly pointed out, Dan reads everyone's PMs, so now I never use the PM system unless it is something I don't care he or the world knows about, and I rarely used it before like I wrote above. My exchanges with Monet were and are in the VCT public forum, not through PMs. I don't consider myself a movie or music critic - I just post up movies, documentaries and music that I like and watch or listen to suggestions made by Monet and others. These are often followed up by discussions of the watched or suggested material. This may not have value for you, but it has value for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Which do you value more, your Fields Medal, or your Physics Nobel Prize medal ?
To your second question. Unless we're talking about the inverted logic of quantum mechanics, "Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence." I mean, that I didn't bother to post up much math here doesn't mean that I don't know any. Furthermore, I couldn't give a hoot about one award, or another, let alone your math hero, Terence Tao. Insofar as my very own theory of everything, I simply pursued a path that simply worked out. The only thus path, as it turns out.
MrV, I don't know what to say to you. I know you must feel hurt and betrayed as things now stand. You have been a supporter and someone I even considers somewhat of an online friend. I am sorry that you got drug into this. I really didn't ask you to make any statements in support of me. That was your choice. But I did drag you in when I publicly asked how I could contact you privately to ask a few questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You are going to have to decide how you feel now and make whatever statement you want to make.
I cannot provide what you and others are asking. I am legally unable to talk about certain things and have been strongly advised not to talk about ANYTHING further. While I have said the case is over, closed ect, I can still be hauled into court for violating the terms of the agreement and a financial judgement made against me, and I am not about to do anything to give back some of the settlement money that was already not really sufficient in my mind.
Now I know there are people like Axelwolf and others saying just provide some trusted 3rd party some information. I have been advised NOT to say anything further to anyone. PERIOD. You think I should ignore this advice for some internet forum crap? NOT going to happen.
I still believe someday some stuff will come out that will answer some questions for some people. I don't know if that will be next week, next month or 2 years from now. Maybe never. But if it does, it will in no way come from me, or even be tied to me by any thread of anything.
So again, you are free to conclude whatever you like at this time. And I don't hold that against you.
Bbbbwwaaahhhhh, the kewl-J gettin one-dogged all over the joint but the boy will NEVER admit that he was bulls-shitting, hey hey!!!!
Thank you, KJ, for totally garbling V. And, of course, for whole-heartedly continuing to shit on him, for absolutely no reason at all. But, most of all, for proving out nothing of your claim. Now I'm free to go my grave, with complete confidence in the knowledge that you, too, are a total dipshit who spent almost two decades arguing with strangers for absolutely no good reason. Thank you. Ha.
And here is a new revelation from me: I will no longer respond to ANY comment or post that ends with or even contains "hey hey!!'. If you want any kind of response from me, you will have to learn to write like a normal person.Quote:
Originally Posted by soxfan
KJ, I am certainly not your enemy and still value your contributions on blackjack, even though it ain't my game.
Yes, I will conclude what I conclude; I'm just hoping for a light at the end of the tunnel.
Great BillYung. Go to your grave. The sooner, the better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
You made two statements an hour ago, (1) that I advocate wagering odd amounts to fool pit folks and (2) that I reported two consecutive years with winnings down to the same second decimal. Both are kind of a minor thing, but both just totally made up. I politely and respectfully asked you to link to the statements.
Again, this particular thing is kind of minor, but it is a pattern. People just make up whatever the fuck they want about me and I am just tired of dealing with it.
On a completely unrelated note: You are a nut, with these 12 different user accounts now. Completely violating posted rules of this forum. It's like you are giving Druff the finger right to his face. A lot of people call one another mental ill or deranged. A lot of people call me mentally ill. I call Singer and Mdawg mentally ill. It has become part of the troll repertoire. YOU, BillYung are mentally ill. And that is not part of the troll repertoire.
I didn't make up anything about you. If you don't require proof, then nor do I. Go prove that I made up anything anywhere. And, what the hell do you know about anything, let alone mental health conditions? Are you a doctor, or psychiatrist, or psychologist? I simply don't use my accounts here in random fashion, but, sequentially, on the honor system. As for the allegations (made by others) that I voted multiple times in any poll, then write Druff, Druff, again, over it. I don't believe that I've, ever, complained, however, to any moderator of any forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJGreat BillYung. Go to your grave. The sooner, the better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
You made two statements an hour ago, (1) that I advocate wagering odd amounts to fool pit folks and (2) that I reported two consecutive years with winnings down to the same second decimal. Both are kind of a minor thing, but both just totally made up. I politely and respectfully asked you to link to the statements.
Again, this particular thing is kind of minor, but it is a pattern. People just make up whatever the fuck they want about me and I am just tired of dealing with it.
On a completely unrelated note: You are a nut, with these 12 different user accounts now. Completely violating posted rules of this forum. It's like you are giving Druff the finger right to his face. A lot of people call one another mental ill or deranged. A lot of people call me mentally ill. I call Singer and Mdawg mentally ill. It has become part of the troll repertoire. YOU, BillYung are mentally ill. And that is not part of the troll repertoire.
Not right now, you twit.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Seriously, V, what the heck are you talking about? And what difference could it make were anyone his enemy, in real life?Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Just like the basic chance of being back-roomed by a casino, let alone roughed up, is next to zero, the same chance of any real enemy giving a shit.
Your boy hasn't really, or actually, done anything, yet.
Another ridiculous claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Will you ever stop making shit up?
Bill, your statement that I didn't check out Monet's Hot Sucker thread is false. I read the posts in that thread. The thread contains valuable information well beyond the accrual of gift-shop merchandise. The thread contains optimal strategies for generating free play itself, free play mailers, and massive food comps (along with free lodging for non-locals) eliminating the need for grocery bills if desired.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1You didn't check out even the "Hot Sucker" thread, which, according to Monet, was everything that an aspiring AP needed to know? Aka, the supposed guide to acquiring all manner of ultra- tacky and cheap casino gift-shop junk, to give away to friends, instead of pay a bit for something nice? What multimillionaire on the face of the planet would bother, let alone via casinos?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayBill, what the fuck are you talking about ? For starters, I very rarely use the PM system here. As you correctly pointed out, Dan reads everyone's PMs, so now I never use the PM system unless it is something I don't care he or the world knows about, and I rarely used it before like I wrote above. My exchanges with Monet were and are in the VCT public forum, not through PMs. I don't consider myself a movie or music critic - I just post up movies, documentaries and music that I like and watch or listen to suggestions made by Monet and others. These are often followed up by discussions of the watched or suggested material. This may not have value for you, but it has value for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Which do you value more, your Fields Medal, or your Physics Nobel Prize medal ?
To your second question. Unless we're talking about the inverted logic of quantum mechanics, "Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence." I mean, that I didn't bother to post up much math here doesn't mean that I don't know any. Furthermore, I couldn't give a hoot about one award, or another, let alone your math hero, Terence Tao. Insofar as my very own theory of everything, I simply pursued a path that simply worked out. The only thus path, as it turns out.
I'm not sure why you don't give a hoot about Terence Tao - what has he ever done to you ? You had written that you were going to present a solution to AccountinQuestion's math problem after I presented mine but you never did. In my opinion it is because you are a dimwit.
How many lawyers does it take to figure out a KJ?
One to turn the bulb, one way, but, the other, to turn it the other way.
Yeah, but what is your opinion, either, worth? I don't deal in opinions. Same as asking what Tao, ever, did for me. Those guys are all about protocol, awards, money, and, most notably, waking around with sticks up their asses. Stone-cold chickenshits.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
This is the kind of post that makes you look like the dumbass liar that everyone knows you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJMrV, I don't know what to say to you. I know you must feel hurt and betrayed as things now stand. You have been a supporter and someone I even considers somewhat of an online friend. I am sorry that you got drug into this. I really didn't ask you to make any statements in support of me. That was your choice. But I did drag you in when I publicly asked how I could contact you privately to ask a few questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
You are going to have to decide how you feel now and make whatever statement you want to make.
I cannot provide what you and others are asking. I am legally unable to talk about certain things and have been strongly advised not to talk about ANYTHING further. While I have said the case is over, closed ect, I can still be hauled into court for violating the terms of the agreement and a financial judgement made against me, and I am not about to do anything to give back some of the settlement money that was already not really sufficient in my mind.
Now I know there are people like Axelwolf and others saying just provide some trusted 3rd party some information. I have been advised NOT to say anything further to anyone. PERIOD. You think I should ignore this advice for some internet forum crap? NOT going to happen.
I still believe someday some stuff will come out that will answer some questions for some people. I don't know if that will be next week, next month or 2 years from now. Maybe never. But if it does, it will in no way come from me, or even be tied to me by any thread of anything.
So again, you are free to conclude whatever you like at this time. And I don't hold that against you.
How many times are you gonna claim not to say anything further? Answer: you'll keep on doing it every time someone gets under your skin with the truth about your hoax.
And did you really say you "consider MrV an online friend"? WTF! You trying to get into his online pants? Get real kew. I know you've gotten your ass handed to you a dozen ways over your propensity to just keep piling up lie after lie after lie on this. But MrV knows you're lying just like everyone else does. He knows even in the extreme circumstances a case were sealed, the public could still find your case. And in case you're deaf, dumb and blind, MrV's been here to witness all your lies, missteps, misstatements, and walk-backs just like everyone else.
We know you cry yourself to sleep every night over being stupid enuf to get caught in your own trap. Maybe if you, baby bro and mommy combined your food stamps you might be able to get enough comfort food to get your scrawny ass through the humiliation. :)
***Yawn*** Give me something new re-run Ron.
I don't know, but regardless of what it is worth, I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
OK. We've just been informed by a reliable source familiar with the situation that everyone got it wrong. You weren't back-ROOMED---you were back-DOORED!Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Now there's something I believe everyone can get behind. And it explains why your lying has been so anal....:):):)
Seems a bit late to start following your lawyer's advice not to post anything about your case.
He can rest assured though that despite your numerous comments nobody has been able to turn up a shred of information about it.
My anonymity (AxelWolf) on the forums is not to hide or be secretive to legitimate members or people or that I have something to hide. I think I have proven that many many times over. I believe I have only ever declined one meetup. It's solely done specifically to not associate my name as/with being an Advantage Player and crazy people. Sure, many casinos already know, but why advertise it for free given them no doubt whatsoever? Heck, there are many online casinos that actually have rules that state no professionals, Advantage Players, or whatever.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJBlackjack has this. It is a private forum inaccessible to those who are not members and have been vetted by membership. If you google blackjack forums, it won't show up. It is a private membership forum. And it is not exactly a blackjack forum. There are players that do all kinds of different AP plays, but there are a lot of blackjack players or former blackjack players that have expanded out to other things. This kind of private forum wasn't even necessary until 5-8 years ago. Most of these AP's were on public AP/blackjack forum. It is all the trolling that public forums have become that lead to these private forums.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
As for AP's that I know and network with....some have come to this forum and verified that they know me, know people that know me, and communicate with me privately. They never stay long before they are driven away. I will give you a name and a partial name. Kim Lee and 2xxxxme. The second asked me not to mention his name on this forum, which he refers to as the "urinal forum". He probably won't like me using the partially redated version. I am sure there have been one of two others as well, although I can't come up with any right now.
Dude this is a troll forum. The "urinal" name fits. I even troll back at times. But you can't have this kind of forum and then wonder why so few APs and real players won't show up and participate.
Now I will tell you something I have never said before. The message I received from an AP that was playing the El cortez game that I unknowingly exposed or ended was received at my email address. I have posted that here once I think, because Rob Singer immediately sent me an nasty email. Almost as expected. But for the most part, I hear from real AP that I network with and even just occasionally communicate with via my email, and the trolls here. So, this nasty, kind of threatening (just enough to express that he/she was pissed) message came via email. And it was a throw-away account used just to send that particular email.
So I don't think it was anyone from here. I briefly though maybe one of the 2or 3 LV AP's that are here, like Axelwolf or MaxPen. But fairly quickly dismissed that. I think it was one of the LV AP's, maybe someone that I network with or talk to occasionally, that just wanted me to know they were pissed. Hopefully they have forgiven me and understand it wasn't intentional...just stupidity on my part.
I know when I first signed up at WOV and some other forums I used a different more descriptive name and quickly realized that wasn't a good idea. In the decade + I have been on the forums I can't be certain I haven't EVER sent an anonymous email or whatever for some strange reason. I vaguely remember sending a possible spammer a message from a dedicated spam email inquiring about whatever he was offering(we set up Bitcoin casinos or whatever, I don't remember).
But I can tell you 100% for sure I don't pull any fake accounts or anonymous email B.S. with legitimate members on the forums or with legitimate people. That's not my style so I don't know why I came to your mind. I'm not claiming I'm some righteous person who's above that, It's just not me, and I can't think of a good reason to do so.
I wish I did, because a number of times when I politely asked someone if they could ixnay on the unsay, it has come back to bite me in the ass. People took my polite request as me attempting to tell them what to do. And now I'm the bad guy. Little did they know, I was asked by OTHERS in many of those cases if I could contact that person and talk to them about exposing TMI.
I actually had this issue with Monet. I didn't even care about the stuff he was talking about, but others did and they asked me to talk to him. I'm the one who caught the backlash.
Remember the flagging of DarkOz's post down, I took the blame and many were involved.
There have been many other times as well.
Sometimes you see something well said and worth noting, this is one of those times.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
lol. It is so absurd. Like a spreadsheet takes up anything but the most miniscule amount of space.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyAnother ridiculous claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Will you ever stop making shit up?
btw if everyone ends their post in hey hey kewl will stop responding and exit like he really needs to do...
hey hey
I thought about starting up a poll... which thread has provided more amusement for this forum? The Newell thread or this thread?
Truly a tough call. The Newell thread would have to win though just for the laughs. This is more bizarre than anything.
Holy shit I FOUND THE COURT CASE.
Kewl, I hate to out you and I want to make the disclaimer that you in no way told me about the case.
I found the case entirely on my own.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6K1HgGMbus
hey hey
Come on you Attorneys and investigators please explain the do's and don'ts of NDA such as this I would assume it's a standard NDA since this isn't some trade-secret work environment. I have to imagine there are loopholes, a restriction on what NDA can actually restrict. How does that all work? What's considered confidential? What if you wanted to know your rights and hired a different attorney and told him your story? What if an NDA is too broad or way too one-sided? What about your spouse, mother, or father?
Will this incident bring you more per hour? Like can you charge 400 to 1000 per hour now to get those guts pumped ?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Can’t wait for the locals to finally see who you are. Karma is a bitch lol
I'm fairly certain that the casino would have to sue Kewl to claw back their money unless there is some sort of arbitration clause but even then they'd just open themselves up to Kewl being able to make this public where the casino has basically acknowledged the incident by this point.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Clearly the casino would never do this over something like Kewl giving out the case number.
They settled out of court to avoid it being public. Then Kewl doesn't make it public but gives out the case number or something similar and all at once the casino wants to make it public to get back a sum of money that even Kewl claims is too little?
It is beyond nonsensical.
The best part is Kewl's complete lack of shame. He just keeps plugging away as if nothing has happened.
hey hey
And I care how?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI don't know, but regardless of what it is worth, I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Fucking A=0 Intelligence Question still going at it. You guys have no families, or theories of everything, to work on?
Gottlob on a mountain top, do, do, do ...
https://youtu.be/l2JytgMvrC0
You care because you read every single post that is posted on this site, and many times you respond by claiming that you don't care.Quote:
Originally Posted by GottlobAnd I care how?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI don't know, but regardless of what it is worth, I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
You're even down in the Documentaries and Movie Section from time to time, lol.
The bar wasn't empty. You just can't see to the left or right. But it wasn't real busy either. Mid winter weeknight. Can't remember what the orange drink was, a light alcoholic beverage. I generally used a beer chaser but that night I changed up for some reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Last time I had a drink was in that same bar, Feb. 28, 2017. It was called That Bar back then. Downtown Great Falls. Now called Snits.
This might be the first post I like from you. Brain dead max the maggot doesn't know the difference between fraud and a ruse. Bwahahahahahahahahhaahahahahha!Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Monet, that's exactly the sort of wife-beater syndrome talk that snags poor KJ, every time. I mean, it's the "superior man", like Zen master V *cough, who doesn't try to (finally) change his underpinnings of, say, inauthenticity (all the way down), but, instead, vigilantly, on each and every occasion, makes the conscious effort not to bullshit. I can hardly respond by not responding. Right?Quote:
Originally Posted by monetYou care because you read every single post that is posted on this site, and many times you respond by claiming that you don't care. You're even down in the Documentaries and Movie Section from time to time, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by GottlobAnd I care how?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Get it? Yes, of course, on a fundamental level I have to care to post something, but, that has nothing to do with what I post per se. Analogous to the thus argument that my going away must mean that I went away "mad" about something per se. When, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
Then a judge comes along to try to just push it in, or, pull it out.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
It's too bad that shows like GWAE never allowed for the true rest of the story, say, with a regular like Blackhole, to counter the gambling baloney. Now that would have been some Goddamn funny radio.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThis might be the first post I like from you. Brain dead max the maggot doesn't know the difference between fraud and a ruse.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1Hardly. No money changed hands, with no thus promises made.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
I don't know how - I'm not a mind reader. In any case it doesn't matter to me whether or not you care that I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by GottlobAnd I care how?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI don't know, but regardless of what it is worth, I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Then why constantly re-iterate such a claim, in affirmative fashion? Is my mere presence enough for you to thus doubt your own very being? Or, some more-primitive threat, to the resident folie a deux?
Perhaps, a (subconscious) Freudian slip, with the "mind reader" bit. Let's further check it out.
---> Mowtowr-e Shomareh-ye Yek Marat Dari Shahid Emir Taher.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
https://anagram-solver.net/I%20don%2...0?partial=true
Which, I guess, loosely translates to something like, "Call on me if you think it necessary and I will come personally to Emir Taher."
But, who is ET? How about clumsy French for mon ET, as in my ET, and, then, monET? Ha. More silly "connections" from the other side.
Of course it is. But kew will simply ignore it, slobber MrV with "I consider you to be my online friend" nonsense, and solicit you, mickey, and jbjb as "fellow AP's who understand me" bs.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfSometimes you see something well said and worth noting, this is one of those times.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
The fool knows his concocted world is falling apart, which is why he keeps pretending that everybody's got it wrong except him. In the end however, he'll find out just how big and stupid an error he made with this hoax, as he comes crawling back thru his own tears to ask for forgiveness. It'll eventually happen, along with a litany of rationale, excuses and explanations that only a mother could believe. Just as he did after faking his death.
THe thing with faking your own death - you have to confront that you can no longer use your crafted internet persona. He would have to have given up Kewlj and starting over with the same story? No way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
With faking your death you can weave some background story as to why you had to do it that ties into your counting lifestyle.
With this there is no excuse. He doesn't need to admit it is made-up. He can simply continue denying which apparently is what he is doing but gl with that.
Oh wait ! This just in ! The poll is dead even. lol. Nice troll, whoever.
So what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Fraud actually requires neither, it most certainly does not require both.
"Fraud becomes a crime when it is a “knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment”
Hopefully your "Theory of Everything" gets it right, but I won't hold my breath.
Actually, I wouldn't worry about my theory. Especially not now.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterVSo what?Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Fraud actually requires neither, it most certainly does not require both.
"Fraud becomes a crime when it is a “knowing misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or her detriment”
Hopefully your "Theory of Everything" gets it right, but I won't hold my breath.
As far as the English language is concerned, there are quite a few tricks to pick up from the professional thus forums. One is the use of ngrams, which have to do with frequency of usage, of words and phrases, over the decades, and centuries. Another held in fairly high regard is a site called Wikidiff, which I went to, first.
Beyond that, it's fairly obvious that what KJ does isn't per se even trickery. Anyone can and may claim to be a blackjack player, and, such claims can inherently carry absolutely zero weight, or accreditation, or other perceived responsibility to the public. Even the back-room nonsense came replete with no pictures, witnesses, or other supporting data, presented as a hoax.Quote:
Fraud is a synonym of trickery.
As nouns the difference between trickery and fraud is that trickery is deception or underhanded behavior while fraud is any act of deception carried out for the purpose of unfair, undeserved and/or unlawful gain.
As a verb fraud is to defraud.
https://wikidiff.com/trickery/fraud
Moreover, as I tried to explain to Monet, some months back, dictionaries aren't meant to be definitive, or consistent, etc, but, mostly as a reflection of the frequency of usage at a given point in history. Otherwise, they would come with built-in theories of everything.
Because you keep making comments about my statement declaring that I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Garnabby, you may be daft but I think your brain works OK and I look forward to reading your "Theory on Everything."
When will it be published for critical review?
Would you call yourself more of a philospher or a scientist?
But, surely, what I do can't compel you to act in particular ways. That's a level of internet dominance that even I didn't anticipate. Regardless, you and Monet come off more as "turtles all the way down".Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayBecause you keep making comments about my statement declaring that I think you are a dimwit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Quote:
"Turtles all the way down" is an expression of the problem of infinite regress. The saying alludes to the mythological idea of a World Turtle that supports a flat Earth on its back. It suggests that this turtle rests on the back of an even larger turtle, which itself is part of a column of increasingly larger turtles that continues indefinitely.
The exact origin of the phrase is uncertain. In the form "rocks all the way down", the saying appears as early as 1838. References to the saying's mythological antecedents, the World Turtle and its counterpart the World Elephant, were made by a number of authors in the 17th and 18th centuries.
The expression has been used to illustrate problems such as the regress argument in epistemology.
V, I try to play it both ways, but, always, with the scientific foot, first.
Einstein was the last of the famous physicists to be a philosopher, too, as well as both a skilled lab technician, and theorist. As much as Hawking appreciated Einstein's mathematical interpretation of things, extended and simplified it, Hawking publicly pronounced philosophy to be dead. Hawking believed that there could be no theory of everything, hence no God, etc, - based on mathematical proof that there could be no axiomatic basis on which to base every truth, ie, there are things that may be both true, but, wholly not provable. Each was a product of their times, particularly of their limits of physical experimentation.
Einstein believed there was one unique solution to everything with Relativity Theory (opposed to Quantum Theories) at its core, but, now several believe that there are several thus solutions, and, in the form of many different notions of physics, itself, which, of course, means that we could not have any way of knowing the other types of physics.
My belief has, always, more or less, been, eg, that the overall puzzle has to be simultaneously worked from each end.
Simultaneous, say, in the abstract sense that even though matter and antimatter, supposedly, stem from nothingness, and, each is eternal, their creation/annihilation is ongoing, which, coincidentally, is a result of quantum entanglement.
Supposedly, matter is taken as the low-energies, in a field, that are perceivable as the periodic table, chemical elements. Einstein noted that matter doesn't truly exist. Contrary to popular belief, Einstein's gravitational field stuff is about energy, not, mass, which is the reason that the Higgs particle stuff, which gives rise to mass on a quantum level, has nothing to do with the big unknown, quantum gravity. (That negative energy doesn't exist, but, the energy of the gravitational curvature of space-time, in a sense, is the "anti-energy".)
Which leads to the notion that mind, itself, either, doesn't truly exist. Which leads to totally unconventional methods to solve the overall puzzle. Which, accidentally or otherwise, leads to a way that very indirectly involves some relatively very simple math attached to only one method of thus solution. You might call it the "standing on thin-ice approach". What no mathematician, or physicist, will accept without simple, self-evident proof beyond an arbitrarily small reasonable doubt. Try telling one that base ten, with numerals made of the digits from 0, to 9, (along with base fourteen), is the natural or preferred system of numerals. You would be met with howls of laughter. But, it's true.
Oh, speaking of Fibonacci (spiral), there's no reason that time has to wrap around on itself, like space, according to Hawking, or, continue without start, or end. One need only start to put things together in a simplistic sense.
My suggestion to KJ.
If true, it's easily proven. Designate an arbitrator/escrow such as Dan and another party.
Pass on any costs to the naysayers (PUT UP OR SHUT UP!)
It's simple, offer up 2,3,4 -10 to 1, or whatever his BR can handle, or perhaps he can get odds if he can prove a trifecta or whatever (?) that he can prove it. Take the bet once a predetermined total escrowed amount reaches an amount that would cover any liability and make it worthwhile for him to do so.
What the Fuck happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I thought you were gonna Shut the Fuck Up and go count cards?
Nope.
You're over here blabbing away again.
Must be drunk.
Prediction, the kewl-J will neither put up nor shut up. It ain't in his nature, hey hey.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Bbbbwwwwwaaaahhhh, I figure by now the garnabby-jones woulda decipher the Voynich Manuscripts by now. I got confidence in the boy, hey hey!!!!
Ok, so first, I am NOT trying to discredit Maxpen, who I have always liked. But we all know he is not impeccable as far as telling the truth. He clearly says things about mickeycrimm that aren't true. And mickey returns the favor. I take max pen at his word that he is motivated by finding the truth and not personal, although I have to say calling someone a fraud, as he did, feels very personal to me.
So I spent several hours last night trying to find exactly what MaxPen looked up. On July 3 he posted he had no idea how to look anything up, and 3 days later was the an expert. So the link that he said he used didn't work, but I was able to navigate my way. I knew were to find the case "I was interested in" because I have the case number. And I know that is all you are going to see....a case number. No plaintiff. No defendant. No attorney's involved. That is all under seal.
So again I wanted to see what that would look like for someone searching through a boatload of cases rather than going directly to that case via case #.. I spent two hours last night. Would have taken the better part of a full day to search everything. But in those two hours I found not only the case "I was interested in", but two additional cases that showed ONLY a case number. No further information. So I assume these cases were also sealed. So just extrapolating this out for all the cases that Maxpen looked at he must have come up with 10-12 cases like this? So what did you do with these cases Maxpen, just toss them aside as irrelevant?
Again, I can't and wont talk about much more. I don't think my very general comments above violates that agreement or my own principal (based on advice). Just some food for thought.
Lol what are you waiting for? Claim one of those case numbers as yours! Or are you waiting to see how it plays out? Sharp... erQuote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Now Axelwolf is pushing for me to not only put up proof which I can't and won't, but in true Axelwolf fashion, thinks there should be a wager involved.:rolleyes:
I CANNOT do what you people are asking. To be honest, if I could I wouldn't based on my own principal that I have held since long before this incident, but that is moot. I CANNOT. On Attorney's advice. Are you people seriously suggesting I should ignore Attorney's advice in favor of internet forum trolling crap? Give me a break.
Do you expect to have any credibility on this forum going forward if you don't?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Oh wait - you don't care. Nevermind.
A compulsive liar like UNKewlJ could no more fess up to lying as stop lying. And the only principle (-ple not -pal you uneducated twit) UNKewlJ follows is to keep on lying.
And anything in the public domain - such as all the details of this case which the compulsive liar just lied about seeing, could not be covered by any confidentiality agreement.
Aww, do you miss me, lover boy? I come to realize you actually had/have feelings for me, I'm sorry I hurt you, it wasn't intentional and I didn't realize I was doing it. You lashed out and wanted to hurt me. Sorry, I don't swing that way and my perception of you was way off. I am often fooled by the Frank Fitts(American Beauty) of this worldQuote:
Originally Posted by monetWhat the Fuck happened?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I thought you were gonna Shut the Fuck Up and go count cards?
Nope.
You're over here blabbing away again.
Must be drunk.
I never said that I was going to go count cards. I said, "Or do something productive". It's rare that I would attempt to count cards, I haven't in a very long time, perhaps in 2012 or so.
I did do something productive for a while for 6-7 hours, some even from the comfort of my home until I felt like vegging out being an internet degen( Would you like a full report?). You do realize you are telling me this like 24 hours later? It's not 2 ish on the 10th, it's 2ish on the 11th now. Are you on drugs/Drunk, you don't seem to be able to follow along well or know what day it is.
It's been a little while since I have been drunk. A few here and there, but that's about it, nothing juicy. Perhaps at the next shindig, I'll have a 3 finger and raise my glass and the middle one to you.
I am hopped up on a 5-hour energy drink getting ready to go get some exercise. Speaking of being productive, why are you here blabbing, Don't you have old ladies to harass or something?
And yes, I'm about to go be productive for a while. I'll see you here tonight, I'm looking forward to it.
You don't deserve a break, alas and alack.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
From now on, every word you post will receive Strict Scrutiny.
No doubt your detractors will continue to heap scorn upon you, while most of the others will either ignore you or limit their response.
The halcyon days of wine and roses have passed.
So you stayed up all night to try and figure out a way to discredit max, without hurting his feelings, whom you've previously proclaimed was the end-all in searching for information.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Then you carry your confirmed hoax even further by pretending to have found your case on the same site max used (as well as several others here) incompetently--adding in another lie about what info's available for the public to see on a sealed case.
Kew, I know you're on the dopey side, but do you EVER look things up on the internet before you yap? This is as bad as you saying "On the advice of my attorney, I'm not saying anything further about this because it could get me in trouble"....over and over again, after you keep coming on to lie about the record.
There are some really stupid people in this world, and then there are high school dropouts like yourself. No wonder you're so insecure in your own skin. And now you'll have to spend the rest of your days being laughed at and being broke.
Now I am late to the party, because I actually had to work today. Well didn't have to...as an AP (self employed) I never have to. But an AP friend shared some very low-level very simple, low end stuff that I could do while getting my feet wet. It was time to get to that. And I gotta say....only 1 day, although I have done some machine stuff before, but I absolutely hate this kind of AP. :( Maybe it will grow on me. Maybe you don't have to like what you do as I am sure there are many working people that don't like what they do. Maybe I have been spoiled because I always did like playing blackjack, or at least most of the time. Anyway we will see what happens with that.
But it got me thinking about this forum compared to where I started 16 years ago on a blackjack forum called Blackjackinfo. the original Blackjackinfo, owned by blackjack tournament player Ken Smith, not the current re-incarnated version. At that time there were still a lot of APs playing blackjack, both hole-carding and card counting. Known players. Expert players. Several members of the MIT team(s), Colin, Tommy Hyland, Munchkin, Al Rogers, Gramazaka who runs teams overseas. Norm (more the software expert than player, although very knowledgeable about blackjack), Automatic Monkey, Icountandtrac, a very proficient card counter. So many others, both professional and recreational that really knew their stuff. I don't remember a jbjb or a JBS, but I am sure you were there under some handle.
For me, THIS was were I really learned how to win. the haters here say I repeat things from the blackjack books. Wrong! (they are always wrong). This is where my knowledge came from...other players sharing their experiences.
Now here is what I don't remember. I don't remember anyone ever challenging anything someone said to the point of demanding proof, or tax returns, or screenshots of bank accounts. That just wasn't even necessary. Why? Because it took but a few minutes to figure who knew what they were talking about. And yes, we had JSTAT on that forum, spouting his conspiracy non-sense that Ed thorp made a mistake in his book.
So I found myself wondering....how did I get from there to here. A forum where it is all trolling. All prove this and prove that, instead of figuring out who knows what they are talking about. And here, even if you figure out who knows what they are talking about, there are groups that try to discredit them, because "they don't like them", don't like their lifestyle or some other personal thing or perhaps find them "condescending".
The next question is why would I have stayed on a forum like this. yeah, I have done my share of trolling. It can be entertaining for a short while. But the trolls here are lifers. Am I a lifer or to become a lifer (troll).
And if the answer is yes...then WHY? Seriously, the past several years has cost me money because a troll hater doxed me and may have provided information directly to casinos or database company (probably casinos). The number I put on that is probably about 100k. That is the price I have paid for continuing on at this forum (and GF). $100,000.
I know there will be all kinds of stupid comments. Hateful comments. beginning with the lifer troll hater that posts as Rob Singer. Most, not all, but most of you people are nuts. And I must be 10x as nuts for having stayed.
PS. In thinking about the old blackjackinfo, there was a member there named machinist. And you might guess he wasn't a blackjack player, or at least primarily a blackjack player. He was a machine specialist AP. A mickeycrimm type. Machinist was the first one of those I actually became aware of. Him and mickey would have had a lot to talk about. The only reason I am relatively sure Machinist wasn't mickey is that Machinist was based in the southern states. Just wondering mickey, have you ever encountered a player that went by machinist on forums? Or perhaps you know him or of him?
More proof you're an idiot and a liar.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Who makes long rambling posts like this other than guilty people? And in case you're too thick or shocked to understand, there's NO ONE you're ever gonna convince of you being a success of any kind playing BJ.
Quit playing the victim, that train left the station some time ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You wonder why people demand proof?
Really?
KJ, you specifically posted that a lawsuit had been filed.
We looked for it and ... *crickets*
When a woman "teases' a man she should not complain when he calls her a fucking cunt.
Rob, I am not a high school drop out. Nor do I live with my mother, who resides in a very nice adult over 50 community. Nor am I broke. You know this. Everyone knows this. That you and someone like Mdawg are so insecure that you repeat things you know are not true...is beyond sad. This is what makes you a lifer.
I have never tried to "convince" anyone of anything regarding my blackjack/AP play. I have simply shared some of my experiences and journey. No doubt in more detail than I ever should have. I have shared years that I made 10k (my first 3 years), a year in 2012 I think that I made 27k. Covid year where I made less than 14k from blackjack. Is that really a guy out to impress anybody?
That is just the way card counting and variance works. Good years. Bad years. And actually, my style of play almost invited more variance than most players dealt with because I used very different spreads and Max bets. I was never afraid of the variance. The only time Variance could have really hurt me, was my first few years in Atlantic City. A bad run would have wiped me out. But those games were so bad, that the max bets opportunities actually came around so infrequently, it created a less volatile game. Less EV, but less variance. I didn't know it at the time but that was a good trade off for that situation....a player playing underfunded. I am sure you don't care. You care about trolling and lying about me. So have at it.
Well you are compelled to reply to my replies, so you speak of your own puppet strings as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
Although most people have already looked this up on the Nevada court site, here it is again, once again even while kew so desperately tries to convince everybody of his lies by sprinkling in multiple unimportant little items about his non-existent case here and there, he keeps pretending we're all as stupid as him.
(c)Sealing of entire court file prohibited Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices:
(i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s);
(ii) the date that the action was commenced;
(iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge;
There's plenty more, but this'll give the serial liar enuf to try and make new lies up. :)
Sean Carroll is an example of this - he is now at Johns Hopkins by way of Cal Tech.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gottlob1
I canNOT talk about the case specifically, but here the general rule. Please note the part where compelling privacy or safety interests outweigh the public interest. It takes a judge to determine that.
I can NOT get into this, but you are talking about something you don't undertstand like YOU, Rob always do.
4.Grounds to seal or redact; written findings required. The court may order the court files and records, or any part thereof, in a civil action to be sealed or redacted, provided the court makes and enters written findings that the specific sealing or redaction is justified by identified compelling privacy or safety interests that outweigh the public interest in access to the court record.
I gotta stop. I am going to be 'scolded' again. Fuck you guys and your internet trolling shit.
Listen Skunk Guts no one believes anything you say because you have lied about everything and everyone going back a decade.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Own up to what you really are. We can’t help that you got Crossed up by neighbor guy as a teen.
Well you need to stop. Not sure who is scolding you.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
You are uniquely pathetic.
Lol breaking your arm from the security guard pushing you into a chair.
Mr Brittle Bones.
I pegged this as bullshit from the get-go. lolz.
This
came up with the lie that the case had been sealed because he thought it would explain why MaxPen was never going to be able to find it.
But this type of case would almost never be sealed in the first place - just by trying to claim that it was he didn't even realize that he was further confirming that he made all of this up. And even if it had been sealed, the full docket would still be public record.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Today, UNKewlJ did not find record of his made up case, or any other case that had been sealed. He didn't even look, he just came up with some more nonsense, not realizing, again, that theThis dumb lie here:Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
contradicts the law since 2008, that provides that the full docket must be provided for any case, sealed or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Rule 3
4(c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited. Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation “case sealed”; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal.
V, can you weigh in here please? Here we have a further verifiable lie from the compulsive liar - that he found this recent case the one he claims is his with ONLY the case # listed, and no parties. ;) In fact, ask the compulsive liar to give us the court case #s of the two recent civil cases he found today that have only the case # listed? Those cases have nothing to do with him, so he could provide those could he not?
Seriously, that $200. would have been well spent.
Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Dude, you say a lot of really stupid things, both about me and unrelated to me. I don't comment on most. But this thing that you keep repeating has to be one of the stupidest.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Hmmm, I wonder who has more credibilities, the kewl-J or that illegitimate, election-stealing, constitution trashing, dementia-ridden, corrupt, compromised, influence peddling, chinks-loving traitor, beijing-biden, hey hey????
It seems that no record of his case being filed in Clark county can be found: that seems to be quite clear, at least based on what some sletuths have posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg;159703
V, can you weigh in here please? Here we have a further verifiable lie from the compulsive liar - that he found this recent case the one he claims is his with ONLY the case # listed, and no parties. ;) In fact, ask the compulsive liar to give us the court case #s of the two [B
BUT (and it's a big but) as I speculated some time ago, what if his attorney filed in Federal, not county court?
Would the database(s) searched find such a filing?
As for the feds having subject matter jurisdiction, i.e. for them to have the ability to hear his case, there needs to be a recognized ground.
Perhaps diversity of citizenship, i.e. not all parties are deemed to be Nevada residents?
That seems unlikely, but if the casino is owned by a corporation in another state then it MIGHT apply, I'm not sure.
Or the guard could be a non-citzen, working at the casino on a green card or the equivalent, but again I am not sure.
The PI cases I filed were all in the county court system, not the federal: federal practice is a whole different thing.
I'd prefer to have the case exist than to conclude KJ lied to me; not that he owes me the truth, but I really wouldn't like it at all.