Quote:
Originally Posted by
MisterV
Quote:
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
Dietz, telling everyone how smart he is with his hi IQ, and perfect SAT scores from 50 years ago, and a 40 year professional sports bettor, while putting down not just me but everyone else, just gets tired after a while.
But what if what he claims is the truth?
What if he actually does have a hi (sic) IQ and had perfect SAT scores from 50 years ago?
If in fact the claims are true then you have insight into the man's mind and can discern the insecurities he must battle with, compelled as it seems he is to brag to strangers about his alleged wit and wisdom and his exploits from the last century; if not true then same conclusion.
Either way you've got him pegged.
He's from the same bolt of cloth as Singer ("you little people") and the hound ("wealthy lawyer, constantly winning huge sums for years in LV").
These are some of the claims that, as you correctly say, provide us with "good internet fun and cheaper than cable."
Actually, what Mr. Lee is missing is the fundamental reality that people are specialists. That 57% at the far end of the bell curve that Mr. Lee mentions is more than fine. It's excellent. I don't know what kinds of weird expectations people have, but anybody banging out a lifetime 55% is doing a helluva job, I can guarantee they are doing it at one sport and one sport only, and Lee can verify that. My lifetime straight-bet college football ATS is roughly 56%. The number gets skewed up a bit from playing certain teasers, but it's 56% on straight wagers, not counting middles shots and arbitrage unless one side is significantly overbet vis-a-vis the other. That 56% is, frankly, excellent. Not sure what kinds of info you folks have been digesting, but you may want to check in with something called reality.
Now I do know someone with a better lifetime ATS record than me. She has dominated something called LineMasters, a private contest. I'm hoping to put her and Mr. Munchkin together sometime soon.
I would love to see the post where I claimed a perfect SAT score -- LOL. Jesus, there is not one single post with anything like that. Go ahead, do a search a thousand times, you won't find anything like that. Not close. Now why would the kewlJ(s) write something like that? I get it -- kewlJ(s) spout thousands of bullshit posts -- if he repeats things often enough, maybe somebody buys his bullshit. I mean, go ahead and search every single one of my posts -- you will not find that claim or anything close. Pretty weird.
Now one of the guys sitting with me in the photos in the Retro Road Trip thread did get a perfect math SAT, which I mentioned. If I need math checked, I would ask him. But when I say someone else did something, I'm not sure how that translates into me doing it.
And that's the problem with KewlJ(s). He lies all the time about everything. This is a forum with all saved posts. There is not one mention of me getting some perfect SAT score, so why would an anonymous idiot quote me as having said that? Because he lies all the time.
And what is the KewlJ(s) response to this fact going to be? The fact that he wrote something completely false multiple times? He'll ignore it and go on bullshitting, which is what he does best -- LOL.
Final note: If you can bang out 57% ATS in one sport consistently or cumulatively, you are The Man. Obviously, from a financial survival standpoint, the issue is that you're not going to generate +30 games or +40 games doing that each year unless it's college hoops. So managing 10-15 games over .500 in something like, say, college football per annum would require a starting bankroll in the half million dollar range, which is what I have said every time this subject is broached.
