DanDruff we all know how much stock UNKewlJ places in what others think (a LOT). He has stated that you think he is credible…so, When you have time, why not take a look at the UNKewlJ backrooming lawsuit, and give us an informed, updated opinion on how credible UNKewlJ is now.
Some key points to consider:
1) He retracted his implying that this all happened at SouthPoint, which his naming the actual casino where this happened was one point you had originally mentioned that weighed in his favor as to whether any of this ever happened.
He doubled down on implying it happened at SouthPoint, by referring to the “timeshares” (Grandview) across the street:
2) He stated that the case was filed and served, and said repeatedly that he had the case number:
3) As far as the settlement, there were at least two discrepancies there:
a) He reported about the signing of the settlement agreement on Juneteenth, a court holiday, on a Monday. He later deflected saying that well it had been signed other than on that day, but that somehow he was only told about it on the court holiday.
b) He reported that he received the settlement funds via ACH on a Saturday, a non banking day. This could not have happened that way.
4) Now, I searched carefully, both federal and state cases for Clark County, Nevada and found NOTHING, no relevant lawsuit.
When UNKewlJ realized that MaxPen was going to search the entire dockets to find the case,
he came up with the new story that the case had been sealed, hoping that this would explain why no one would ever be able to find the case:
Now, by quoting the Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS), as the basis for the sealing:
He nailed down exactly where the lawsuit supposedly was filed:
he thereby verified that the case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Nevada, which is where the NRS apply.
Eighth Judicial District Court
Civil over >15K
https://www.clarkcountycourts.us/Por...e/Dashboard/29
so that told us that yes, MaxPen and I were searching in the right place, BUT, besides the fact that a false imprisonment battery civil case would almost never be sealed (his claiming that it was sealed was an obvious lie presented to try to explain why no one was ever going to find the case), what UNKewlJ didn’t realize, was that since 2008, the law in Nevada has been that even for sealed cases the full docket will still appear:
https://www.leg.state.nv.us/courtrules/SCR_RGSRCR.html
Rule 3
4(c) Sealing of entire court file prohibited. Under no circumstances shall the court seal an entire court file. An order entered under these rules must, at a minimum, require that the following information is available for public viewing on court indices: (i) the case number(s) or docket code(s) or number(s); (ii) the date that the action was commenced; (iii) the names of the parties, counsel of record, and the assigned judge; (iv) the notation “case sealed”; (v) the case type and cause(s) of action, which may be obtained from the Civil Cover Sheet; (vi) the order to seal and written findings supporting the order; and (vii) the identity of the party or other person who filed the motion to seal.
Even after all that, after MaxPen confirmed that there was in fact no such lawsuit whatever on record,
UNKewlJ came back with some nonsense about how he had searched and found “his” lawsuit with just the case number noted, along with two other recent civil cases:
but when pressed, he couldn’t even provide the case numbers for the two cases he claimed he had found, unrelated to himself, and MaxPen further confirmed that his search of entire dockets had unearthed no cases whatsoever where the full docket was not visible.
Additionally, he continued to claim that he could not talk about the sealing “I can NOT get into this”, when the statute provides that the grounds for sealing, Anything related to the sealing, why it was done and who sought the sealing, would be public record. And, anything that is public record cannot be compelled to be confidential by agreement or otherwise.
Which brings us to other inconsistencies about the case and how he has discussed it:
1) That his arm was broken by simply being pushed into a chair “Brittle Bones” – as AccountInQuestion has put it
2) That the video was turned over to his attorney simply by request, before even a lawsuit was filed
3) UNKewlJ’s confusion over whether a judge did or did not sign an order to get the video (before any lawsuit was filed)
4) UNKewlJ’s confusion over how many days the casino had to respond to the lawsuit (UNKewlJ claimed 60, by statute it is 21)
5) UNKewlJ’s confusion over whether he was the plaintiff or defendant (he kept referring to the casino as Plaintiff), even after he supposedly signed a long settlement agreement where he would have been referred to as “Plaintiff” multiple times
6) Told us repeatedly in the past that he has attorney Nersesian on speed dial, and yet has gone out of his way to state that he has never named what attorney might be involved in this case
7) UNKewlJ’s confusion as to whether a judge was needed or not needed to approve the settlement agreement
8) UNKewlJ's confusion about what he could and could not talk about as the case was settled, and after:
a. Claimed he could not discuss what the settlement amount was, but at least three times off handedly implied exactly how much he has received
b. Claimed he could not name the casino involved, even though this is public record, sealed case or not
c. Claimed he could not reveal the case number to anyone, even though this is public record, sealed case or not
d. Claimed he could not discuss why the case was sealed, even though this would be public record if the case even was sealed
(Anything in the public domain cannot be enforced as confidential.)
e. Claimed that he was released from the requirement to not talk about the lawsuit at all, and yet, has been claiming repeatedly that he cannot.
9) Claimed that various unnamed APs and the press contacted him about this matter, and yet no one has come forward to say anything about it other than UNKewlJ.
Seriously, when it comes to dealing with this convoluted, contradictory story, it is a headache just to make sense of it. It is a function of UNKewlJ’s twisted confused mind that none of it makes sense.
But the fact remains that there is no record of this supposedly filed and served lawsuit, and that UNKewlJ has refused to even provide the two cases he supposedly found that have nothing to do with his own case, where he claims that only a case number appears.
Verifiably, he is lying.
DanDruff, you want to weigh in again on whether this backrooming lawsuit story is credible? It took me only a half hour to recall and summarize all the issues above. If anyone wants to weigh in with anything I missed, feel free.
And in case you want to wade through the evidence yourself:
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...o-back-rooming
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...The-Verdict-Is
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...ackjack-player